SCI Clinical Trial
Official title:
Intranasal Administration of Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate for Bowel Evacuation
DWE (difficulty with evacuation) is a common and an important quality of life issue after
spinal cord injury. Not only is the management DWE time-consuming and unpleasant, but the
results are often suboptimal in terms of complications such as incontinence and impaction.
Bowel care regimens after spinal cord injury have not changed in any significant fashion in
many years. The usual strategies for attaining bowel evacuation involve dietary manipulation
(e.g., high fiber diets and hydration), thrice weekly laxative administration (senna and
cascara) and thrice weekly anorectal instillation of cathartics (enemas and suppositories).
Bowel care can be quite time consuming (greater than 2 hours in many instances) and may also
require extensive nursing care. Finally, incomplete evacuation could contribute to fecal
incontinence that has significant morbidity in these patients.
In preliminary studies performed at the JJPVAMC, IV, IM, and subcutaneous injection of
neostigmine combined with glycopyrrolate were demonstrated to be highly effective to promote
bowel evacuation in the SCI population. In an effort to provide a more realistic
administration of this procedure, we propose to test the intranasal spray injection of
neostigmine and glycopyrrolate for safety and efficacy.
We have been studying the effects of spinal cord injury on the bowel for over ten years. Our data suggests that one of the fundamental consequences of spinal cord injury is a slowing of intestinal peristaltic activity, most likely as a result of down regulation of parasympathetic neural pathways. Furthermore, measures that increase parasympathetic stimulation to the bowel result in bowel evacuation and improve bowel care. In this respect, significant acute effects have been demonstrated after the intravenous administration of the cholinergic agent neostigmine (Am J Gastro 100:1560-5, 2005). Long term efficacy has also been shown using intramuscular administration of neostigmine (Gastro 128:P258, 2005). Subcutaneous administration of neostigmine is in progress at this time. Bowel evacuation also is facilitated by subcutaneous administration but often requires a second dose (30 minutes after the first). This observation is likely due to a decreased rate of absorption from this tissue compartment and a correspondingly lower peak level of neostigmine (vide infra). Given the potential cardiopulmonary toxicity of neostigmine (bradycardia and bronchoconstriction), neostigmine was administered in these studies in combination with the anticholinergic agent glycopyrrolate. We have reported that the latter selectively blocks the cardiopulmonary side effects of neostigmine without significantly decreasing the prokinetic peristaltic response. In summary, our data to date indicates that the combined administration of neostigmine and glycopyrrolate is safe after spinal cord damage and it results in predicable and prompt bowel evacuation. ;
Endpoint Classification: Pharmacokinetics Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03780829 -
AIH for Spinal Cord Repair
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00627107 -
A Study Testing Safety and Tolerance of the ReWalk Exoskeleton Suit
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00856648 -
SmartPill Monitoring for Assessment of GI Function in SCI
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00860990 -
VA Gastrointestinal (GI) Quality of Life Survey
|
N/A |