Effects Of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mobilization

Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction Clinical Trial

Official title:

Effects Of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mobilization On Pain And Disability In Post-Partum Females With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04790500
• Other study ID #: REC/00846 Nusrat Javed
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 14, 2020
• Est. completion date: August 20, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: September 2021
• Source: Riphah International University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim is to describe the severity of pain in postpartum female and management of sacroiliac joint pain and disability and define the effects of manual therapy on sacroiliac joint dysfunction and pain

Description:

The aim is to describe the severity of pain in postpartum female and management of sacroiliac joint pain and disability and define the effects of manual therapy on sacroiliac joint dysfunction and pain in postpartum females and to check whether the amount of gaining range of movement is similar among postpartum female undergoing with mobilization therapy and with muscle energy technique.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 50
• Est. completion date: August 20, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: August 20, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 20 Years to 40 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• 20-40 year having unilateral back pain around or on sacral sulcus,

• Positive posterior pain provocation test for Sacroiliac joint dysfunction,

• Low back pain within six weeks of delivery

• Pain while sitting down, lying on the ipsilateral side of pain, or climbing stairs.

• Local tenderness of the posterior aspect of the sacroiliac joint

• Pain is usually localized over the buttock.

• Sharp, stabbing, and/or shooting pain which extends down the posterior thigh usually not past the knee.

• C-section

Exclusion Criteria:

• Neurological deficit

• Spinal tumors

• Scoliosis,

• Underwent spinal surgery and prolapsed

• Intervertebral disc with or without radiculopathy

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Joint Diseases
• Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Intervention

Other:
• mobilization technique
Mobilization of sacroiliac joint which will increase the range of motion and reduction in pain and improvement in functional limitation.
• muscle energy technique
Muscle energy technique it is known as active muscular relaxation technique. It helps in lengthening the shorten muscle and increasing range of restricted muscles

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Pakistan	Pakistan railway hospital	Rawalpindi	Punjab

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Riphah International University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Pakistan, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Numeric pain rating scale	o The 11-point (numeric pain rating scale) NPRS will use to capture the patient's level of pain. The scale is anchored on the left with the phrase ''no pain'' and on the right with the phrase ''worst imaginable pain.'' Patients rate their current level of pain and their worst and least amount of pain in the last 24 hours. The average of the 3 ratings or any single rating may be used to represent the patient's level of pain. Numeric pain scales have been shown to be reliable and valid. The reliability of numeric pain rating scale is 0.74	4th week
Primary	Modified Oswestry disability index	It is a self-report questionnaire of a patient's perceived disability based on 10 areas of pain and daily activities (pain intensity, personal hygiene, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sexual activity, social activity and travelling). Each section is scored on a6-point scale (0-5), with 0 representing no limitation and 5 representing maximal limitation. The subscales combined add up to a total maximal score of 50. The score is then doubled and interpreted as a percentage of the patient-perceived disability (the higher the score, the greater the disability). In cases where patients did not answer all the 10 sections, the sum score of the answered sections were divided by the number of completed sections. The reliability of modified oswestry disability index is 0.88.	4th week