Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03488433
Other study ID # STUDY00008723
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 1, 2019
Est. completion date December 16, 2019

Study information

Verified date December 2019
Source Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To compare the functional and anatomical outcomes, and patient satisfaction and compliance between two different postoperative immobilization methods - abduction shoulder brace versus simple arm sling - following 2 common shoulder surgical procedures - rotator cuff repair (RCR) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) through a prospective randomized clinical trial.


Description:

Scientific Background and Gaps Rotator cuff repair and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are common procedures that aim to provide patients with less pain, better shoulder function, and overall improved quality of life. The number of these procedures performed annually has increased dramatically, and improved outcomes have been demonstrated for each intervention. Part of the success of these operations is dependent on postoperative rehabilitation and patient compliance. Shoulder immobilization versus early range of motion following each procedure has conflicting data, and recent studies have shown that the method of shoulder immobilization may not influence clinical outcomes. Previous studies, both clinical and biomechanical, have demonstrated that arm position following RCR impacts tension and stress placed on the repair, but few have shown whether this translates to improved patient outcomes. Some surgeons prefer simple arm slings for the above-named procedures, while others opt for the abduction brace. Multiple studies have shown the optimal shoulder position that places the least amount of tension on the RCR, or soft tissue envelope following RTSA, however there is no consensus as to the optimal postoperative immobilization technique that significantly affects patient outcomes. An antirotation sling is significantly cheaper than an abduction shoulder brace, and our anecdotal experience is that patients experience more difficulties with an abduction shoulder brace than an antirotation sling. Our study aims to determine whether patient outcomes are significantly affected by immobilization with an abduction brace or simple arm sling. Our hypothesis is that antirotation slings are no better or worse than shoulder abduction braces in regards to shoulder range of motion, satisfaction and compliance with the immobilization method, and pain.

Study Rationale There is a lack of evidence regarding abduction braces versus simple arm slings for postoperative immobilization following rotator cuff repair and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. A better understanding of outcomes between each device will allow for more options available to the patient and surgeon, as well as a potential for decreased cost to the patient as there is a substantial difference in cost between the two devices.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date December 16, 2019
Est. primary completion date December 16, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- patients 18 years and above

- male or female Rotator cuff tear patients - adults with a small or medium-sized (less than 3 cm in the anteroposterior dimension) full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon, diagnosed with MRI or ultrasound, unresponsive to conservative therapy for >3 months

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients - adults with rotator cuff arthropathy, glenohumeral joint arthritis with significant glenoid wear or retroversion requiring reverse arthroplasty or massive irreparable rotator cuff tear, functional deltoid, as demonstrated on x-rays, MRI, and physical exam. Failed conservative management for >3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

- younger than 18 years old

- chronic opiate use, fibromyalgia

- Rotator cuff repair patients - no previous rotator cuff repair surgery, no concomitant preoperative stiffness (definition: < 30 degree passive external rotation, < 100 degree passive forward elevation), no concomitant full-thickness subscapularis tear, no neurologic disorder affecting the ipsilateral upper extremity, no concomitant cervical pathology, partial thickness tear, large or massive tears (>3cm in the anteroposterior dimension), glenohumeral or rotator cuff arthropathy, history of rheumatoid arthritis.

- Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients -no concomitant preoperative stiffness (definition: < 30 degree passive external rotation, < 100 degree passive forward elevation), no concomitant neurologic disorder affecting the ipsilateral upper extremity, no concomitant cervical pathology.

arthroplasty for fracture, revision surgery, insufficient bone stock requiring hemiarthroplasty, deltoid dysfunction, history of rheumatoid arthritis.

- prisoners

- non English speaking or unable to understand consent

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
Abduction brace
Donjoy Ultrasling IV
Antirotation sling
Donjoy shoulder immobilizer

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Missouri Columbia Missouri

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (9)

Conti M, Garofalo R, Castagna A. Does a brace influence clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? Musculoskelet Surg. 2015 Sep;99 Suppl 1:S31-5. doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0357-0. Epub 2015 May 10. — View Citation

Hatakeyama Y, Itoi E, Pradhan RL, Urayama M, Sato K. Effect of arm elevation and rotation on the strain in the repaired rotator cuff tendon. A cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;29(6):788-94. — View Citation

Hollman F, Wolterbeek N, Zijl JAC, van Egeraat SPM, Wessel RN. Abduction Brace Versus Antirotation Sling After Arthroscopic Cuff Repair: The Effects on Pain and Function. Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep;33(9):1618-1626. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Apr 17. — View Citation

Jackson M, Tétreault P, Allard P, Begon M. Optimal shoulder immobilization postures following surgical repair of rotator cuff tears: a simulation analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Aug;22(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.042. Epub 2013 Jan 24. — View Citation

Kiet TK, Feeley BT, Naimark M, Gajiu T, Hall SL, Chung TT, Ma CB. Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Feb;24(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.06.039. Epub 2014 Sep 9. — View Citation

Lambers Heerspink FO, van Raay JJ, Koorevaar RC, van Eerden PJ, Westerbeek RE, van 't Riet E, van den Akker-Scheek I, Diercks RL. Comparing surgical repair with conservative treatment for degenerative rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Aug;24(8):1274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.040. — View Citation

Mall NA, Tanaka MJ, Choi LS, Paletta GA Jr. Factors affecting rotator cuff healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 May 7;96(9):778-88. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00583. Review. — View Citation

Pedowitz RA, Yamaguchi K, Ahmad CS, Burks RT, Flatow EL, Green A, Iannotti JP, Miller BS, Tashjian RZ, Watters WC 3rd, Weber K, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, Anderson S, St Andre J, Boyer K, Raymond L, Sluka P, McGowan R; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Optimizing the management of rotator cuff problems. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Jun;19(6):368-79. — View Citation

Zuckerman JD, Leblanc JM, Choueka J, Kummer F. The effect of arm position and capsular release on rotator cuff repair. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 May;73(3):402-5. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Postoperative range of motion Both active and passive range of motion will be measured in forward elevation, external rotation at the side, internal rotation at extension, external rotation at abduction, and internal rotation at abduction by the examiners using a handheld goniometer. Multiple time points are for assessing the changes in motion. Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 5 months, and 12 months following the index procedure.
Secondary Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score Measures subjective pain; minimum 0, maximum 10 with 0 being a pain-free condition and 10 being the worst pain ever experienced Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 5 months, and 12 months after surgery
Secondary American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score Measures patient's subjective shoulder function using a series of survey questions regarding subjective rating of range of motion, strength, use, and pain of the shoulder; minimum 0 to maximum 100 with 0 being the worst shoulder function and 100 being the best shoulder function Assessed at 5 and 12 months after surgery
Secondary Patient compliance 5-point Likert-type scale Measure compliance with their assigned immobilization method measured using a 5-point Likert-type scale (Question: Did you wear the sling as instructed in the protocol? Not at all, occasionally, about a half of the time, for the most part, yes definitely) Assessed at 12 weeks after surgery
Secondary Patient satisfaction 5-point Likert-type scale Measures overall patient satisfaction with their immobilization method using a 5-point Likert-type scale (Question: Are you satisfied with the immobilization method using the sling you wore? Not at all, not much, so-so, pretty much, yes definitely) Measured at 12 weeks
Secondary Complications Such as shoulder dislocations, wound healing issue, pain development at areas other than the operated shoulder due to the immobilization, etc Assessed at 12 months after surgery
Secondary QuickDASH (Disability of arm, shoulder, and hand) score system Measures the extent of subjective disability of upper extremity; consisted of survey questions regarding subjective pain and function of the upper extremity; Minimum 0, maximum 100 with 0 being no disability and 100 being most severe disability) Assessed at 5 and 12 months after surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Withdrawn NCT03319784 - Analysis for NSAID VS Corticosteroid Shoulder Injection in Diabetic Patients Phase 4
Completed NCT03663036 - Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Fascia Lata Autograft - Survivorship of the Autograft Analysis N/A
Suspended NCT03290196 - The Effect of EXPAREL® on Postsurgical Pain, and the Use of Narcotics Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT03091075 - Oxandrolone Rotator Cuff Trial N/A
Completed NCT03380533 - Buprenorphine Transdermal Patches in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT04566939 - A Long Term Follow-Up of Rotator Cuff Tear Patients Treated With Integrated Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Active, not recruiting NCT02716441 - Rotator Cuff Failure With Continuity
Completed NCT03540030 - Opioid-Free Shoulder Arthroplasty Phase 4
Completed NCT02298023 - Treatment of Tendon Injury Using Allogenic Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (Rotator Cuff Tear) Phase 2
Completed NCT01459536 - Assessment of Muscle Function and Size in Older Adults With Rotator Cuff Tear N/A
Completed NCT01383239 - Impact of Postoperative Management on Outcomes and Healing of Rotator Cuff Repairs N/A
Completed NCT02850211 - A Selective COX-2 Inhibitor Provides Pain Control But Hinders Healing Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Phase 4
Completed NCT01204606 - Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Multimodal Analgesia(MMA) N/A
Terminated NCT00936559 - Study Evaluating Safety Of BMP-655/ACS As An Adjuvant Therapy For Rotator Cuff Repair Phase 1
Completed NCT01170312 - Arthroscopic Surgery and Platelet Rich Plasma In Rotator Cuff Tear Evaluation N/A
Completed NCT00852657 - Comparison of Tendon Repair and Physiotherapy in the Treatment of Small and Medium-sized Tears of the Rotator Cuff N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT00182299 - An RCT to Compare the Outcomes of Patients With Large Rotator Cuff Repair That Undergo Repair With or Without SIS Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06120998 - Quality of Life After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Completed NCT05897866 - Sayed Issa's Hybrid Shoulder Arthroscopic-Open Surgical Management (HSSM) N/A
Completed NCT02644564 - Early Clinical Examination and Ultrasonography Screening of Acute Soft Tissue Shoulder Injuries N/A