Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05297305
Other study ID # 2022-000
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 20, 2023
Est. completion date December 2025

Study information

Verified date October 2023
Source William Beaumont Hospitals
Contact Grace SanAgustin, BSN
Phone 248-551-6679
Email Grace.SanAgustin@beaumont.org
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this study is to compare the effect of different ways to place the component that goes at the top of the humerus (upper arm) in reverse total shoulder replacement. Some surgeons place the humeral tray component sitting on the bone while others place it in the bone. Changing the way that the humeral component is placed may change how much the arm can raise up or turn out/in after surgery for some patients. This study compares patients with inlay humeral component (tray sits in the upper arm bone) versus onlay humeral component (tray sits on top of the upper arm bone) to see if there are differences in range of motion or function after surgery.


Description:

This study aims to determine if active external rotation two years postoperatively varies based on whether an inlay or onlay humeral component is used in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The study also aims to determine whether active forward elevation, abduction, scapular notching, and functional outcomes two years postoperatively vary based on whether an inlay or onlay humeral component is used in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Patients undergoing primary RTSA by Dr. J. Michael Wiater, Dr. Brett Wiater, or Dr. Alexander Martusiewicz at Beaumont Health will be screened for eligibility. Following informed consent, participants will be randomised (1:1) to one of the following groups: 1) RTSA with inlay humeral component (Tornier Perform Stem Reverse+) or 2) RTSA with onlay humeral component (Tornier Ascend Flex stem). At baseline, participants will complete study questionnaires, receive a range-of-motion (ROM) exam, and standard of care x-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans. These evaluations will be repeated at 3 months, 12 months and 24 months.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 154
Est. completion date December 2025
Est. primary completion date December 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients undergoing primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with the following components: 1. Onlay group: Ascend Flex stem, Perform Reversed standard +3 lateralized 25mm baseplate with standard 36 mm glenosphere or +6 lateralized 25mm baseplate with 39mm glenosphere 2. Inlay group: Perform Stem Reverse, Perform Reversed +3 lateralized 25mm baseplate with standard 36mm glenosphere or +6 lateralized 25mm baseplate with 39mm glenosphere - Diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, or primary osteoarthritis with cuff tear - Negative external rotation lag sign, ability to externally rotate beyond neutral - Age 18 years or older Exclusion Criteria: - Revision arthroplasty - Prior open shoulder surgery - Concomitant tendon transfer (Latissimus Dorsi, Pectoralis Tendon, Lower Trapezius) - Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, infection, acute trauma or instability - Patients not willing to undergo a standardized physical therapy protocol or home therapy program after surgical intervention - Patient anatomy does not accommodate the study implants per surgeon discretion - Pregnant, patient-reported - Minors (under 18 years of age) - Cognitively impaired based on a diagnosis of dementia, psychiatric disorder, or any cognitive deficit that will not allow for proper informed consent or answering of study questionnaires

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Tornier Ascend Flex stem
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty using onlay component (tray placed at top of humerus)
Tornier Perform Stem Reverse+
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty using inlay component (tray placed in humerus)

Locations

Country Name City State
United States William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak Michigan

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
William Beaumont Hospitals Stryker Nordic

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Active external rotation, 2 years Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active external rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Active external rotation, 3 months Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active external rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Active external rotation, 1 year Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active external rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Strength during active external rotation, 3 months Strength measurement during active external rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Strength during active external rotation, 1 year Strength measurement during active external rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Strength during active external rotation, 2 years Strength measurement during active external rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds 2 years postoperative
Secondary Active forward elevation, 3 months Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active forward elevation. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Active forward elevation, 1 year Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active forward elevation. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Active forward elevation, 2 years Range of motion of repaired shoulder, active forward elevation. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Strength during active forward elevation, 3 months Strength measured during active forward elevation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Strength during active forward elevation, 1 year Strength measured during active forward elevation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Strength during active forward elevation, 2 years Strength measured during active forward elevation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Abduction, 3 months Range of motion of repaired shoulder, abduction. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Abduction, 1 year Range of motion of repaired shoulder, abduction. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Abduction, 2 years Range of motion of repaired shoulder, abduction. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Strength during abduction, 3 months Strength measured during abduction of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Strength during abduction, 1 year Strength measured during abduction of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Strength during abduction, 2 years Strength measured during abduction of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Internal rotation, 3 months Range of motion of repaired shoulder, internal rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Internal rotation, 1 year Range of motion of repaired shoulder, internal rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Internal rotation, 2 years Range of motion of repaired shoulder, internal rotation. Measured with goniometer in degrees. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Strength during Internal rotation, 3 months Strength measured during internal rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Strength during Internal rotation, 1 year Strength measured during internal rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Strength during Internal rotation, 2 years Strength measured during internal rotation of repaired shoulder. Measured with dynamometer in pounds. 2 years postoperative
Secondary External rotation lag sign test, 3 months Number of patients with positive external rotation lag sign test. The test is performed with the elbow passively flexed and repaired shoulder abducted 90 degrees by the examiner. Next, the examiner passively takes the patient's shoulder into a position of maximal external rotation. The patient is then instructed to hold that position. A positive test is if the patient cannot maintain the position and the shoulder rotates internally. A positive test indicates supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon weakness. 3 months postoperative
Secondary External rotation lag sign test, 1 year Number of patients with positive external rotation lag sign test. The test is performed with the elbow passively flexed and repaired shoulder abducted 90 degrees by the examiner. Next, the examiner passively takes the patient's shoulder into a position of maximal external rotation. The patient is then instructed to hold that position. A positive test is if the patient cannot maintain the position and the shoulder rotates internally. A positive test indicates supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon weakness. 1 year postoperative
Secondary External rotation lag sign test, 2 years Number of patients with positive external rotation lag sign test. The test is performed with the elbow passively flexed and repaired shoulder abducted 90 degrees by the examiner. Next, the examiner passively takes the patient's shoulder into a position of maximal external rotation. The patient is then instructed to hold that position. A positive test is if the patient cannot maintain the position and the shoulder rotates internally A positive test indicates supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon weakness. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Drop arm test, 3 months Number of patients with positive drop arm test of repaired shoulder, performed by passively abducting the patient's shoulder and observing for arm drop as the patient slowly lowers the arm to the waist. A positive test indicates supraspinatus dysfunction. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Drop arm test, 1 year Number of patients with positive drop arm test of repaired shoulder, performed by passively abducting the patient's shoulder and observing for arm drop as the patient slowly lowers the arm to the waist. A positive test indicates supraspinatus dysfunction. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Drop arm test, 2 years Number of patients with positive drop arm test of repaired shoulder, performed by passively abducting the patient's shoulder and observing for arm drop as the patient slowly lowers the arm to the waist. A positive test indicates supraspinatus dysfunction. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Lift off test, 3 months Number of patients with positive lift off test. The test is performed by the patient performing internal rotation of repaired shoulder, by lifting the hand off the back while the examiner places pressure on the hand. The test is considered to be positive if the patient cannot resist, lift the hand off the back or if the patient compensates by extending the elbow and shoulder. A positive test indicates subscapularis weakness. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Lift off test, 1 year Number of patients with positive lift off test. The test is performed by the patient performing internal rotation of repaired shoulder, by lifting the hand off the back while the examiner places pressure on the hand. The test is considered to be positive if the patient cannot resist, lift the hand off the back or if the patient compensates by extending the elbow and shoulder. A positive test indicates subscapularis weakness. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Lift off test, 2 years Number of patients with positive lift off test. The test is performed by the patient performing internal rotation of repaired shoulder, by lifting the hand off the back while the examiner places pressure on the hand. The test is considered to be positive if the patient cannot resist, lift the hand off the back or if the patient compensates by extending the elbow and shoulder. A positive test indicates subscapularis weakness. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Belly press test, 3 months Number of patients with positive belly press test. The patient is asked to press the palm of the hand against the abdomen and bring the elbow forward. The test is positive if the patient is unable to maintain maximal internal rotation of repaired shoulder, demonstrates weakness or the elbow deviates posteriorly. A positive test indicates subscapularis muscle dysfunction. 3 months postoperative
Secondary Belly press test, 1 year Number of patients with positive belly press test. The patient is asked to press the palm of the hand against the abdomen and bring the elbow forward. The test is positive if the patient is unable to maintain maximal internal rotation of repaired shoulder, demonstrates weakness or the elbow deviates posteriorly. A positive test indicates subscapularis muscle dysfunction. 1 year postoperative
Secondary Belly press test, 2 years Number of patients with positive belly press test. The patient is asked to press the palm of the hand against the abdomen and bring the elbow forward. The test is positive if the patient is unable to maintain maximal internal rotation of repaired shoulder, demonstrates weakness or the elbow deviates posteriorly. A positive test indicates subscapularis muscle dysfunction. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Functional impairment by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score (ASES), 3 months Patients will complete a questionnaire of the repaired shoulder function and pain, with 100 maximum points. A score of 0 indicates no impairment (best outcome), and 100 indicates maximum impairment (worst outcome). 3 months postoperative
Secondary Functional impairment by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score (ASES), 1 year Patients will complete a questionnaire of the repaired shoulder function and pain, with 100 maximum points. A score of 0 indicates no impairment (best outcome), and 100 indicates maximum impairment (worst outcome). 1 year postoperative
Secondary Functional impairment by American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons' score (ASES), 2 years Patients will complete a questionnaire of shoulder function and pain, with 100 maximum points. A score of 0 indicates no impairment (best outcome), and 100 indicates maximum impairment (worst outcome). 2 years postoperative
Secondary Quality of life by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score (WOOS), 3 months Patients complete a questionnaire comprising 4 domains of: physical symptoms; sports, recreation and work; lifestyle; and emotions. Each question is answered using a visual analog scale with a possible score ranging from 0 to 100. There are 19 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 1900. A score of 1900 signifies that the patient has an extreme decrease in the shoulder-related quality of life (worst outcome), whereas a score of 0 signifies that the patient has no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life (best outcome). 3 months postoperative
Secondary Quality of life by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score (WOOS), 1 year Patients complete a questionnaire comprising 4 domains of: physical symptoms; sports, recreation and work; lifestyle; and emotions. Each question is answered using a visual analog scale with a possible score ranging from 0 to 100. There are 19 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 1900. A score of 1900 signifies that the patient has an extreme decrease in the shoulder-related quality of life (worst outcome), whereas a score of 0 signifies that the patient has no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life (best outcome). 1 year postoperative
Secondary Quality of life by Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score (WOOS), 2 years Patients complete a questionnaire comprising 4 domains of: physical symptoms; sports, recreation and work; lifestyle; and emotions. Each question is answered using a visual analog scale with a possible score ranging from 0 to 100. There are 19 questions, and the total score ranges from 0 to 1900. A score of 1900 signifies that the patient has an extreme decrease in the shoulder-related quality of life (worst outcome), whereas a score of 0 signifies that the patient has no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life (best outcome). 2 years postoperative
Secondary Global Health, by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global 10 (PROMIS-10) score, 3 months Patients will complete the PROMIS-10 assessment of global health for the previous 7 days, a 10-question assessment where each statement is scored from 1 (poor health) to 5 (excellent health) on a Likert scale. A total score is summed from the 10 questions, resulting in a minimum of 10 and maximum of 50 points. Higher scores indicate better health (best outcome). 3 months postoperative
Secondary Global Health, by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global 10 (PROMIS-10) score, 1 year Patients will complete the PROMIS-10 assessment of global health for the previous 7 days, a 10-question assessment where each statement is scored from 1 (poor health) to 5 (excellent health) on a Likert scale. A total score is summed from the 10 questions, resulting in a minimum of 10 and maximum of 50 points. Higher scores indicate better health (best outcome). 1 year postoperative
Secondary Global Health, by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global 10 (PROMIS-10) score, 2 years Patients will complete the PROMIS-10 assessment of global health for the previous 7 days, a 10-question assessment where each statement is scored from 1 (poor health) to 5 (excellent health) on a Likert scale. A total score is summed from the 10 questions, resulting in a minimum of 10 and maximum of 50 points. Higher scores indicate better health (best outcome). 2 years postoperative
Secondary Visual Analog Scale measure of pain, 3 months Shoulder-related pain reported by the patient for the repaired shoulder as a score on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain at all (best outcome), and 10=pain as bad as it can be (worst outcome). 3 months postoperative
Secondary Visual Analog Scale measure of pain, 1 year Shoulder-related pain reported by the patient for the repaired shoulder as a score on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain at all (best outcome), and 10=pain as bad as it can be (worst outcome). 1 year postoperative
Secondary Visual Analog Scale measure of pain, 2 years Shoulder-related pain reported by the patient for the repaired shoulder as a score on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0=no pain at all (best outcome), and 10=pain as bad as it can be (worst outcome). 2 years postoperative
Secondary Scapular notching, 3 months Scapular notching of the repaired shoulder. Measured from radiographic evaluation and scored on the Sirveaux classification scale as Grade 1-4, where grade 1 indicates a defect that only involves the inferior pillar of the scapular neck (best outcome). In Grade 2, the notch contacts the lower screw. In Grade 3, erosion of the bone extends over the lower screw. In Grade 4, the notch extends under the baseplate (worst outcome). 3 months postoperative
Secondary Scapular notching, 1 year Scapular notching of the repaired shoulder. Measured from radiographic evaluation and scored on the Sirveaux classification scale as Grade 1-4, where grade 1 indicates a defect that only involves the inferior pillar of the scapular neck (best outcome). In Grade 2, the notch contacts the lower screw. In Grade 3, erosion of the bone extends over the lower screw. In Grade 4, the notch extends under the baseplate (worst outcome). 1 year postoperative
Secondary Scapular notching, 2 years Scapular notching of the repaired shoulder. Measured from radiographic evaluation and scored on the Sirveaux classification scale as Grade 1-4, where grade 1 indicates a defect that only involves the inferior pillar of the scapular neck (best outcome). In Grade 2, the notch contacts the lower screw. In Grade 3, erosion of the bone extends over the lower screw. In Grade 4, the notch extends under the baseplate (worst outcome). 2 years postoperative
Secondary Reoperation Number of patients requiring reoperation of the same shoulder within 2 years. 2 years postoperative
Secondary Study-related adverse events All adverse events determined by the PI to be probably or definitely related to study interventions (surgery or device). 2 years postoperative
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT06070493 - The Effects of Myofascial Release Technique N/A
Completed NCT04541953 - TeleRehabilitation Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair N/A
Completed NCT04944446 - Myofascial Release in Shoulder Pathologies N/A
Recruiting NCT06112444 - Validity And Reliability Study Of The Turkish Version Of Short Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index
Completed NCT04594408 - Tranexamic Acid to Improve Arthroscopic Visualization in Shoulder Surgery Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT04686396 - Demineralized Bone Matrix Rotator Cuff Study N/A
Recruiting NCT05988541 - Rotator Cuff Integrity and Clinical Outcomes 5 Years After Repair. N/A
Completed NCT04470167 - Phase 1/2 Clinical Study of TPX-115 in Patients With Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tear Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT02528084 - The Effects of Yoga on Patients With Rotator Cuff Injuries N/A
Recruiting NCT05011331 - The Effect of a Custom Pillow on Sleep Quality in Patients With Nonoperative Rotator Cuff Syndrome N/A
Recruiting NCT04209504 - Evaluating Hemidiaphragmatic Paralysis With Prolonged Neural Blockade From an Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
Completed NCT03967574 - Subacromial Corticosteroid Injections and tDCS in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05906004 - Retrospective Data Collection and Prospective Clinical Investigation for the Augmentation or Reinforcement of the Rotator Cuff Using the Pitch-Patch
Completed NCT04952623 - Online Education to Improve the Management of Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain N/A
Recruiting NCT05344898 - Subscap Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty N/A
Recruiting NCT04175184 - Inclusion of Mobilisation With Movement to an Exercise Programme in Rotator Cuff Related Pain N/A
Terminated NCT05215600 - Anaverseā„¢ Glenoid System and Its Instrumentation
Recruiting NCT05822414 - ESP vs STB for Pain and Diagraphragm Function for Shoulder Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04833244 - Automatic Multimodal Assessment of Occurrence and Intensity of Pain for Research and Clinical Use N/A
Completed NCT03982108 - Comparison of Two Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques: Knot-tying Versus Knotless Suture-bridge Technique N/A