Potassium-titanyl Phosphate (KTP) Laser vs KTP Laser and Ivermectin Cream for Facial Rosacea

Rosacea Clinical Trial

— KIR  

Official title:

Comparison of the Efficacy of Potassium-titanyl Phosphate (KTP) Laser vs KTP Laser Combined With Ivermectin 1% Cream for Facial Rosacea: a Randomized Split-face Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06033352
• Other study ID #: 2023-D0015
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: September 12, 2023
• Est. completion date: May 1, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: November 2023
• Source: Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
• Contact: Kristine Heidemeyer, MD
• Phone: 316322218
• Email: Kristine.Heidemeyer[@]insel.ch
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Rosacea is a frequent chronic inflammatory disease affecting mainly the face but also eyes and scalp. Rosacea is classified into 3 types: erythemato-teleangiectatica, papulopustulosa and phymatosa. Treatments depend on the type and include topical and systemic antibiotics, azelaic acid, topical ivermectin, topical brimonidine, systemic isotretinoin as well as intense pulsed light (IPL) and laser therapies. For treatment of telangiectasia and redness, laser and IPL therapies are the first choice. Vascular lasers, such as pulsed dye lasers (PDL) and potassium-titanyl phosphate (KTP) lasers as well as IPL, have demonstrated good efficacy in reduction of erythema and telangiectasias in patients with rosacea. However, these treatments are expensive and mostly not covered by the health insurance. Therefore, for patients it is important to receive the maximal effect and improvement after each single laser session. Ivermectin is a semi-synthetic derivative of avermectin and has an anti-inflammatory effect as well as an antiparasitic effect on demodex mite. The latter is playing an important pathogenetic role in rosacea. This randomized controlled study aims to compare the effect of KTP laser in combination with ivermectin 1% cream vs KTP laser alone in patients with facial rosacea.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 22
• Est. completion date: May 1, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: May 1, 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV
• Presence of facial erythematous rosacea or mild papulopustular rosacea with permanent erythema
• Informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of adverse events related to KTP laser therapy
• Pregnant or breastfeeding women
• Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study
• History of intolerance or allergic reaction to ivermectin 1% cream or one of the ingredients
• Ongoing treatment for skin cancer
• Ongoing treatment with strong inhibitors of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4 (e.g., itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, clarithromycin, cobicistat)
• Ongoing treatment with substances with a narrow therapeutic range whose excretion depends substantially on P-gp (e.g. digoxin, ciclosporin)
• Inability to understand the study content

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Rosacea

Intervention

Device:
• KTP laser
Treatment with KTP 532 nm laser. Laser fluence depends on erythema intensity and ranges from 7.0 J/cm2 to 11 J/cm2 with a 4-11 mm spot size and 8-12 ms pulse duration.

Drug:
• Ivermectin 1% cream
Application of ivermectin 1% cream 1x/day. Interruption for 4 days in case of irritation/redness.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Switzerland	Department of dermatology, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern	Bern

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Switzerland, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Incidence of observed side-effects	Cumulative number of observed treatment side-effects.	16 weeks
Other	Incidence of observed adverse events	Cumulative number of observed treatment adverse events.	16 weeks
Primary	Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing erythema as assessed by NEI	Any relative decrease of erythema on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by Normalized Erythema Index (NEI), ranging from 0 to 80, with higher values indicating a worst erythema.	16 weeks
Secondary	Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing erythema as assessed by SRI	Any relative decrease of erythema on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by Skin Redness Index (SRI), ranging from 1 to 4, with higher score indicating a worst erythema.	16 weeks
Secondary	Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing erythema as assessed by CEA	Any decrease of erythema on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by Clinical Erythema Assessment (CEA), ranging from 0 to 4, with higher score indicating a worst erythema.	4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Secondary	Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in the clinical improvement of skin lesions as assessed by PGA	Any change of skin lesions on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by 6-point Physician Global Assessment (PGA), ranging from 0 to 5, with higher score indicating a better outcome.	4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Secondary	Patient's satisfaction related to laser and cream vs laser alone in the improvement of skin lesions as assessed by VAS	Any difference of patient's satisfaction for the improvement of skin lesions on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by a 9-point anchored visual analogue scale (VAS), ranging from -4 to +4, with negative scores indicating a worsening of condition, with 0 indicating no difference and with positive scores indicating an improvement.	4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Secondary	Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing telangiectasia severity as assessed by TGS	Any change of telangiectasia severity on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone as assessed by telangiectasia grading scale (TGS), ranging from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating a worst telangiectasia severity.	4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Secondary	Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing papules and papulopustules	Any change in the number of papules and papulopustules on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone.	4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Secondary	Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing face swelling as assessed by the patient	Any change in the number of days of face swelling on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone, as assessed by the patient	4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Secondary	Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing face redness as assessed by the patient	Any change in the number of days of face redness on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone, as assessed by the patient.	4, 8, 12, 16 weeks
Secondary	Efficacy of laser and cream vs laser alone in reducing face purpura as assessed by the patient	Any change in the number of days of face purpura on the side treated with KTP laser and ivermectin 1% cream vs laser alone, as assessed by the patient.	4, 8, 12, 16 weeks