View clinical trials related to Root Coverage.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to to describe and evaluate an approach, free mucogingival graft (FMG), in periodontal plastic surgery for root coverage (RC) in lower incisor gingival recessions (GR) with mucogingival conditions and deformities (MCD) that might negatively influence the outcomes of conventional RC procedures.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of platelet- rich fibrin and coronally advanced flap technique in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions in comparison with connective tissue graft technique.
Gingival recession is defined as the displacement of the soft tissue margin apical to the cemento-enamel junction with exposure of the root surface. It affects a broad population with presence of periodontal disease as well as periodontally healthy individuals. The occurrence of gingival recessions is age-dependent and their development begins relatively early in life. For instance, gingival recessions were noticed in more than 60% of Norwegian 20-year-olds and in more than 90% of the older population. Similar findings were reported in Brazilian and French population. In populations deprived of dental care, the occurrence of gingival recessions was even higher. Many factors have been implicated in the etiology of gingival recession, including plaque, position of the tooth in the arch and improper toothbrushing. It is difficult to see a single cause for the development of labial gingival recession. It has been demonstrated in several investigations that if left untreated, the probability of progression of the recession is high even with good oral hygiene. The indications for treatment of gingival recession are: esthetics, dental hypersensitivity, and the prevention of caries as well as further progression of the recession. Therapeutic options for recessions have been well documented with a high degree of success. Their ultimate goal is the location of the gingival margin coronal to the CEJ, with minimal probing depth and a pleasant soft tissue integration with the adjacent teeth. With such a prevalent condition, it becomes critical to discriminate when to treat these lesions and which are the anatomical and surgical characteristics that are going to determine the amount of root coverage. Regarding surgical characteristics, it has been demonstrated that the accomplishment of complete root coverage may be prejudiced by the post-surgical position of the gingival margin (the more coronal to the CEJ the greater the chance to achieve root coverage). The same author conducted a randomized clinical trial showing that the higher the flap tension, the lower the recession reduction. Another surgical factor affecting root coverage may be the use of microsurgical approaches by the use of smaller diameter sutures. According to a recently published systematic review, early suture removal (less than 10 days) can negatively affect root coverage outcome. The healing process after pedicle graft was investigated in an animal model study. The healing was divided into four different stages, the adaption stage (0-4 days), the proliferation stage (4-21 days), the attachment stage (27-28 days) and the maturation stage (1-6 months). During the proliferation stage, connective tissue invades the fibrin layer from the basal level of the flap, and after 6-10 days a layer of fibroblasts is seen in apposition to the root surface. These cells are believed to differentiate into cementoblasts at a later stage of healing. At the end of the proliferation stage, thin collagen fibers are formed adjacent to the root surface, but a fibrous union between the connective tissue and the root has not been observed. It seems logical that stabilizing the flap with sutures for a prolonged period of time during the proliferation phase would help maintain the gingival margin on a more coronal position postoperatively. On the other hand, the longer the sutures remain postoperatively, the greater the chances of plaque accumulation and inflammation affecting negatively to root coverage. The systematic review by Tatakis and Chambrone included 17 randomized clinical trials that provided an overall data of 325 single recession defects that were treated by coronally advanced flap. While they investigated time of suture removal, the studies included in this study did not account for this variable, thus leading to some bias. Moreover, different suture materials, type of suturing technique may also play an important role in the healing process. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of timing suture removal regarding root coverage on coronally advanced flap.
Several techniques were proposed in the literature to solve the problems associated with gingival recession. Root coverage was mainly indicated for esthetic concern, however, it might also be indicated for treatment of root hypersensitivity and maintaining adequate plaque control by keratinized tissue augmentation. These proposed surgical techniques were well-documented with successful outcomes. Each technique had its own advantages, disadvantages and indications. Various factors affected the most suitable technique. These factors were either related to the dimensions of gingival recession defect, or related to the surgeon experience or to the patient himself . Nowadays, the scope of scientific research is concerned with designing surgical techniques that are more predictable, high esthetic, less invasive and patient centered In this way, continuous modification of surgical techniques aroused to result in a more reproducible outcomes; such as the attempt to advance pedicle flaps without vertical releasing incisions, as in the modified coronally advanced flap and the modified microsurgical tunnel technique. However, controversy still exist in the literature regarding the best technique for root coverage. Coronally advanced flap is the most commonly reported technique in research, with lack of researches on tunneling techniques.
A clinical evaluation of using the semilunar coronally position flap (SCPF) compared to the conventional coronally advanced flap (CAF) with modification to treat class I Miller gingival recession. The coronally repositioned gingival margin will be stabilized by coronally anchored suture with composite stops on the buccal surface of the tooth using flowable composite. The sample size will be ten patients. Each patient has bilateral Miller Class I gingival recessions; one will be treated with SCPF, while the other will be treated with CAF
Comparison of Coronally advanced flap with semilunar vestibular incision technique for root coverage in patients with multiple gingival recession in maxillary teeth.
The hypothesis of this study is that coronally positioned tunnel with acellular dermal matrix using a continuous sling suture to secure both the graft and the flap will result in better percent root coverage compared to the continuous sling suturing technique to secure the graft and the flap separately.