Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05517551
Other study ID # E1-22-2755
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date August 2022
Est. completion date March 2023

Study information

Verified date August 2022
Source Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Contact betül güven aytaç, MD
Phone 05073578351
Email drbguven@hotmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has gained increasing popularity compared to open radical prostatectomy with its advantages such as low blood loss, reduced blood transfusion rate, low complication rate, and shortened hospital stay. Since robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy should be performed in the limited retroperitoneal area, insufflation of the abdomen with carbon dioxide (CO2) (pneumoperitoneum) and steep Trendelenburg position are required to provide better surgical vision. Low-flow anesthesia warms and moistens the inhaled gases, creating a more physiological breathing atmosphere during anesthesia. In addition, it provides cost advantage by reducing inhalation agent consumption and reduces atmospheric pollution. Studies show that long-term minimal flow anesthesia is safe and advantageous for non-laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to compare low-flow (1L/min) with normal flow (3lt/min) desflurane anesthesia in terms of hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, inhalation agent consumption and soda lime consumption for robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy surgery. The secondary aim of the study is to compare the effects of low-flow and normal-flow anesthesia in the steep trendelenburg position (45°) used for robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 68
Est. completion date March 2023
Est. primary completion date September 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - ASA I-II risk group Exclusion Criteria: - ASA III, IV, V, - concomitant serious cardiac, respiratory, hepatic, renal disturbance, - mental status disorder and hearing problem, - anxiety and depression and/or other psychiatric disorders, - patient's refusal

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
robotic assisted radical prostatectomy
Patients who will undergo robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Ankara City Hospital Ankara

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary inspiratory O2 concentration inspiratory O2 concentration is measured from anesthesia machine monitor from beginning of anesthesia induction to the end of anesthesia (during periopertaive period)
Primary partial oxygen pressure PO2 from blood gas analysis from beginning of anesthesia induction to the end of anesthesia (during periopertaive period)
Secondary desflurane consumption desflurane consumption at the end of anesthesia is measured from anesthesia machine monitor perioperative
Secondary changes in liver and kidney function tests from the preoperative values to 48 hours postoperative to determine the changes in serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine from the preoperative values to 48 hours postoperative during operation and 48 hours postoperative
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03313700 - Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer N/A
Completed NCT05510960 - Video Gaming Improves Robotic Surgery Simulator Success
Completed NCT06056401 - Comparison of Volume-controlled and Pressure-controlled Ventilation in Clasp-knife Position N/A
Completed NCT06405308 - Robotic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Versus Robotic Transabdominal Specimen Extraction Surgery for Early-Stage Rectal Cancer
Completed NCT06146023 - Performance of Robotic Microsurgery Systems N/A
Completed NCT03110120 - Interest of Serratus Plane Block in Postoperative Analgesia for Robot-assisted Surgery N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06336746 - Effects of Steep Trendelenburg and Pneumoperitoneum on Cardiac Performance.
Recruiting NCT05960539 - Robotic Curriculum for Young Surgeons
Completed NCT05194280 - Comparison of Robot-assisted Donornephrectomy vs Hand-assisted Laparoscopic Donornephrectomy
Not yet recruiting NCT06421974 - Effectiveness of Robotic Surgery for Right Colon Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT03524300 - Clinical Efficacy Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy in Patients With Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer N/A
Completed NCT04265417 - Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Robotic Assisted Rectal Cancer Resection Alone vs. Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Not yet recruiting NCT05468944 - Robotic Transanal Specimen Extraction Surgery Versus Robotic Transabdominal Incision Specimen Extraction Surgery for Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial N/A
Completed NCT01925677 - Robotic Single Port Donor Nephrectomy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03673410 - Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Techniques for Revisional Bariatric Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT06466902 - Evaluation of Intra-operative Photographs for the Assessment of a Proper Lymphadenectomy in Minimally-invasive Gastrectomies for Gastric Cancer (PhotoNodes)
Active, not recruiting NCT06219993 - Robot-assisted Modified Kasai Portoenterostomy Versus Open Kasai Portoenterostomy for Biliary Atresia
Completed NCT06397053 - Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
Completed NCT02989415 - Assessment of Ventilatory Management During General Anesthesia for Robotic Surgery
Recruiting NCT05151835 - Novel Robotic Surgical System for Minimally Invasive Surgery N/A