View clinical trials related to Risk Management.
Filter by:Whereas there are several validated systems for reporting postoperative complications, there are only a few and not prospectively validated systems for reporting intraoperative complications. The investigators developed a definition and CLASSification for Intraoperative Complications CLASSIC within a Delphi study involving international interdisciplinary experts. As both surgery and anaesthesia may be involved in complications in the perioperative period, all patient-related intraoperative complications occurring between skin incision and closure are considered in this reporting system. CLASSIC was updated to ClassIntra® v1·0, by encompassing five severity grades to align with the validated Clavien-Dindo Classification for grading postoperative complications. The aim of this international multicentre observational cohort study is to assess the validity and practicability of this newly derived and updated classification system ClassIntra® in patient undergoing an in-hospital surgical procedure. Providing an easy applicable and internationally validated classification system is a contribution to improve quality of health care and patient safety.
The aim of this study is to overcome the current limits of the scoring systems used to predict both the thrombotic (VTE) and hemorrhagic (BLD) risk for the patient. The main problem of these scoring systems is due to the high rigidity related to the score assigned at each risk item. The presence of an item assigns the full score for that item, without the possibility to moderate that item's score. The final class of risk, for the patient, is the sum of the scores of the selected items. The approach used for the assessment is based on the presence or absence of certain items that will be summed. Starting from scoring system currently used for VTE (PADUA, CAPRINI, KHORANA) and also for BLD (IMPROVE), we will integrate all common items in a single scoring system managed by risk management algorithms that can identify the different classes of risk.
Avoidable care associated incidents are relatively frequent in primary care. In France for example, avoidable incidents rate is estimated to 22/1000 medical acts from general practitioners. Patient safety is now a growing issue in primary care. One tool to increase patient safety is incident reporting and analysis. It could reduce some important consequences for patients and could allow implementing substantial corrective actions. The aim of the PRisM study is to assess and compare the efficiency of a multifaceted risk management program implemented in the french pluridisciplinary offices in primary care in association with a centralized incident reporting system, versus a centralized incident reporting system only.