Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02604589
Other study ID # 2015-233
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received November 2, 2015
Last updated November 2, 2016
Start date March 2016
Est. completion date June 2019

Study information

Verified date November 2016
Source William Beaumont Hospitals
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Data and Safety Monitoring BoardUnited States: Institutional Review BoardUnited States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Rib fractures are common injuries in accident patients and can be associated with significant pain during recovery. If poorly controlled, pain from splinting due to rib fractures can result in difficulty in breathing leading to incomplete expansion of lung, and even the need to put a patient on a ventilator to help them breathe. Therefore, pain control is critical in managing patients with rib fractures. To date, many studies have shown the effectiveness of continuous intercostal nerve blockade (a slow release of pain medications at the site of injury that prevents the transmission of pain signals). This approach has never been studied in a randomized fashion in rib fracture patients, and has never been compared to patient-controlled narcotic pain medication, commonly used at many hospitals. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the placement of an elastomeric infusion pump (a small, external, wearable balloon used to deliver medication over time) attached to a continuous infusion catheter or "soaker" catheter (a tube which releases the pain medication through tiny holes in it, right at the site of injury) to deliver local anesthetic medication to reduce pain caused by two or more rib fractures.


Description:

Treatment of rib fractures using an elastomeric infusion pump (a small, external, wearable balloon used to deliver medication over time) containing pain medication and a continuous infusion catheter or "soaker" catheter (a tube which releases the pain medication through tiny holes in it, right at the site of injury) placed in the extrathoracic paraspinous space (a site in the back that is near the broken ribs) to create a continuous intercostal nerve block is relatively novel. Truitt and colleagues have published two studies evaluating the effectiveness of this approach. A pilot study on 30 patients was published in 2010 showing that placement of these catheters was a safe, viable and effective procedure, and resulted in decreased pain scores in rib fracture patients. A second study included 102 patients studied prospectively (from the time of admission to the hospital) comparing epidural anesthesia (an injection of anesthetic into the spine) with local catheter delivery in a non-randomized fashion in 2011. This approach is beginning to be more widely used, but has never been studied in a randomized fashion, and has never been compared to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, delivery of a pain medication by the push of a button), commonly used at many hospitals.

We hypothesize that accident patients with two or more rib fractures who receive pain control through the continuous infusion system will achieve improved pain control in a dose-dependent fashion, improved lung function, and therefore, will require less narcotic pain medication, achieve discharge criteria earlier and have a shorter hospital length of stay in comparison to patients treated with PCA alone.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 10
Est. completion date June 2019
Est. primary completion date March 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Admission to trauma service at Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan

- Two or more rib fractures in an anatomic pattern feasible for nerve blockade (unilateral or bilateral)

- Age greater than or equal to 18 years

- Ability to comprehend and endorse an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding

- Patients intubated before placement of continuous infusion catheter

- Any significant concomitant injuries potentially confounding for evaluation of the effectiveness of analgesia (eg., traumatic brain injury)

- History of an allergic reaction to local anesthetic

- Use of other regional anesthetics before evaluation (epidural or paravertebral nerve blockade)

- International Normalized Ratio (INR) > 2.0

- Inability to obtain informed consent

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
hydromorphone hydrochloride
Patient-controlled narcotic analgesia pump
Procedure:
Infusion catheter placement
Placement of continuous infusion catheter and elastomeric pump into extrathoracic paraspinous space
Drug:
bupivicaine 0.25%
Low Dose analgesia
bupivicaine 0.5%
High dose analgesia

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak Royal Oak Michigan

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Anthony Iacco William Beaumont Hospitals

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Narcotic Use Quantity of systemic narcotic used (hydromorphone hydrochloride, Dilaudid) averaged per day over the length of hospital stay, in mg/24 hours. 3 days or hospital length of stay, if less than 3 days No
Secondary Change in pulmonary function Determine the impact of catheter-infused medications on maximal inspiratory lung volume measured by incentive spirometer as a change from baseline at 24, 48, 72 hours and at 3 days post catheter placement or at discharge (or PCA placement in comparator group). Endpoint will be the time to improvement of vital capacity to greater than 1.4 liters (or 15 mL/kg). 3 days or hospital length of stay, if less than 3 days No
Secondary Change in pain intensity Determine the impact of catheter-infused medications on self-reported pain intensity reported as a change from baseline (admission) at 24, 48, 72 hours and at 3 days post catheter placement or at discharge (or PCA placement in comparator group) on a 0-10 point Likert scale, with 0=no pain, and 10= the worst pain ever. Response will be defined as time to a decrease of at least two points on the scale. 3 days or hospital length of stay, if less than 3 days No
Secondary Morbidity Collection of complications observed at any point during the hospital admission that included randomization, including pneumothorax, hemothorax, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, empyema, need for tracheostomy, need for mechanical ventilation, length of time on mechanical ventilation, and an assessment of the degree of association of each event with the catheter insertion procedure or with underlying trauma. Each of these outcomes will be scored as yes/no. 3 days or hospital length of stay, whichever is longer Yes
Secondary Mortality All cause death, death associated with infusion catheter, within 30 days from date of randomization. This outcome will be scored as yes/no and cause of death will be collected. 30 days Yes
Secondary Hospital length of stay Integer days of inpatient admission in the hospital stay that included randomization. from randomization to discharge, an average of 5 days No
Secondary Surgical Intensive Care Unit length of stay Integer days of admission to the surgical intensive care unit. from admission to Surgical Intensive Care unit to discharge from Surgical Intensive Care Unit, an average of 3 days No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04554186 - Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block. N/A
Completed NCT02432456 - Ketamine Infusion Therapy for the Management of Acute Pain in Adult Rib Fracture Patients Phase 4
Recruiting NCT04413799 - PVB vs Ketamine/Lidocaine in Rib Fracture Patients Early Phase 1
Completed NCT05770232 - Retrospectively Analyze the Risk Factors of VTE in 5774 Patients With Thoracic Trauma From 33 Hospitals in China, and Established a Risk Prediction Model
Completed NCT03305666 - Trial of Injected Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Infusion After Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures Phase 4
Completed NCT03768193 - Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block vs Surgically-placed Paravertebral Block for VATS Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT05865327 - UltrasouNd-guided Percutaneous Intercostal Nerve Cryoneurolysis for Analgesia Following Traumatic Rib Fracture N/A
Recruiting NCT04100512 - Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure (OPEP) Therapy in Trauma Patients With Multiple Rib Fractures N/A
Completed NCT02608541 - Sheffield Multiple Rib Fractures Study:
Completed NCT04168996 - Individualized Discharge Planning in Patients With Rib Fracture N/A
Recruiting NCT05714631 - Lidocaine Patches in Elderly Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures Phase 4
Recruiting NCT03619785 - US-guided SAPB for Rib Fractures in the ED Phase 4
Suspended NCT03711812 - Serratus Anterior Block and Catheter Use in Rib Fractures in the Emergency Department N/A
Completed NCT05321121 - Dexmedotomidine for Acute Pain Control in Patients With Multiple Rib FracturesRandomized Controlled Trial Phase 4
Completed NCT04863807 - A Retrospective Review of Rib Fracture Pain Management at a London Major Trauma Centre
Withdrawn NCT05069961 - Non-Inferiority Study of Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared to Thoracic Epidural in Pain Management of Rib Fractures N/A
Recruiting NCT03919916 - Serratus Plane Block With Parenteral Opioid Analgesia Versus Patient Controlled Analgesia in Rib Fractures N/A
Terminated NCT03805360 - The Erector Spinae Plane Block and Its Effect on Respiratory Status and Pain Management in Rib Fracture Patients Phase 1
Terminated NCT04558281 - Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Rib Fractures Phase 4
Completed NCT02132416 - Operative Treatment of Unstable Thoracic Cage Injuries and Chest Wall Deformity in Trauma N/A

External Links