View clinical trials related to Rib Fractures.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine if patients with rib fractures who undergo cryoablation of the intercostal nerves have improved pain control 7 days from procedure when compared to those who have a ESP catheter.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effectiveness of the Serratus Anterior Plane Block in patients with rib fractures. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Determine if UG-SAPB results in an improved pain, incentive spirometry, and cough ability (PIC) score when compared to usual care over the first five hours. - Evaluate if UG-SAPB results in fewer opioid medications administered when compared to usual care over the first 24 hours. Participants will undergo the Serratus Anterior Plane. Researchers will compare this to usual care to see if this intervention improves pulmonary function and reduces opioid requirements for ED patients with rib fractures.
Respiratory physiotherapy is routinely performed after thoracic surgery operations to increase lung expansion and prevent pulmonary complications such as atelectasis and pneumonia. It is a controversial issue whether respiratory physiotherapy reduces pulmonary complications in rib fractures. In our study, patients with rib fractures will be divided into two groups. In the control group, standard treatment consisting of routine analgesic treatments will be applied. In the other group, respiratory physiotherapy will be applied with triflu for 8 hours a day. At the end of the study, pulmonary complications in both groups will be compared.
Kinesiotaping is used as a physiotherapy method to reduce muscle pain. In this technique, kinesiotaping tapes are attached to the relevant parts of the body. Patients experience serious pain in rib fractures. Kinesiotaping technique can potentially reduce pain by contributing to external stabilization of the ribs. In this study, patients with isolated rib fractures will be divided into two groups. The first group will be treated with kinesiotaping technique and routine painkillers. The second group will receive routine painkiller treatment. Pain scores between both groups will be compared.
Rib fractures are common after blunt injury to the chest. Present in 10% of blunt trauma admissions. Pain associated with rib fractures can result in compromise of pulmonary function causing hypoxaemia or pneumonia, which may require mechanical ventilation. Adequate relief of rib fracture pain allows the patient to breathe deeply, avoid intubation and clear secretions effectively, which will minimise the pulmonary complications . Pain control is essential for not only primary pain relief but also preventing secondary complications such as atelectasis or pneumonia as well as the transition to chronic pain. Accordingly, further steps are now being taken from the conventional pain control medication and techniques by the introduction of more aggressive pain control measures .Traditional regional anaesthesia (RA) techniques such as paravertebral, intercostal and epidurals injections are resource-intensive and time-consuming, limited to single dermatomes; provide incomplete analgesia of the hemithorax; and are associated with significant potential complications such as local anaesthetic intoxication, vasovagal syncope, hemi diaphragmatic paresis and pneumothorax . The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel fascial plane block. Its use has been documented in numerous instances with positive outcomes in controlling acute as well as chronic pain. The most popular technique was the continuous infusion through a catheter . Fascial plane blocks that can be used for rib fracture pain management are serratus anterior plane block, erector spinae plane block and the rhomboid intercostal and subserratus (RISS) block. The procedure is more simple to use with a lower incidence of complications ,less time consuming , more superficial than others so it can be used in patients on anticoagulant therapy . Providing analgesia for patients with rib fractures continues to be a management challenge. Therefore, further studies are needed comparing between different techniques to prove their efficacy in pain management
The purpose of this study is to explore the difference between the clinical effects of surgical and non-surgical treatment for patients with low rib fracture, and to explore whether SSRF has more clinical treatment advantages in patients with low rib fracture in a randomized, controlled and prospective manner.
Various modalities have been proposed for real-time confirmation of loss of resistance (LOR) for thoracic epidural blocks. With real-time ultrasound (US) guidance, the anesthesiologist attempts to visualize the sonographic advancement of the epidural needle and penetration of the epidural space (as detected by LOR) This observational study is set out to confirm the reliability of real-time ultrasound guidance as an adjunct to LOR for thoracic epidural blocks.
In patients admitted following a trauma, the incidence of multiple rib fractures is reported to be 9,7%, and this can be even higher in high energy trauma like motor vehicle accidents (1). Pain deriving from rib fractures cause the patient to breath shallow in order to limit discomfort and this bring about negative consequences: shallow breathing and inability to clear secretions may cause pulmonary atelectasis eventually evolving to pneumonia. Given the aforementioned concerns, it is easy to understand why, in a context like this, control of chest pain become crucial. The best way to achieve adequate pain control have not yet been established: the aim of this study is to investigate on this clinical dilemma. In this study, 72 people with at least two monolateral rib fractures are going to be randomized into three groups: 1) standard treatment alone (intravenous analgesia: acetaminophen + morphine PCA); 2) continuous serratus plane block + standard treatment; 3) single-shot serratus plane block + standard treatment. The variables that are going to be recorded are the following: pain through the NRS scale, FEV1 and FVC through spirometry and finally an arterious gas analysis. Recording are going to be repeated at 72h after admission. The primary endpoint is to evaluate if the continuous serratus plane block is able to improve the FEV1/FVC compared to single shot or standard treatment alone. Secondary endpoints will be: the effect of continuous block on 1) resting and incident pain; 2) opioid consumption; 3) blood gas analysis parameters; 4) pulmonary complications at 1 month; 5) length of stay
Rib fractures, while in isolation are self-limited and benign, can be exquisitely painful. Poorly controlled rib fracture pain can compromise respiratory function leading to increased morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly. Currently, opioid medications are the mainstay of analgesia but are associated with significant adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and delirium. In an effort to improve acute pain in the ED and concomitantly reduce opioid use, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has been implemented more frequently The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively new ultrasound-guided procedure for thoracic analgesia. Previously, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block has been used for this indication. However, typical anatomical distribution limits the effectiveness of the SAP block to anterior rib fractures, while the majority of traumatic rib fractures are posterior, thus require a more central blockade such as the proposed ESPB. The ESPB can be done as a single injection into the superficial structures of the back under ultrasound guidance and as such, is a both a relatively safe and technically easy procedure to perform, especially in comparison to the more traditional alternatives of epidurals, paravertebral and intercostal injections. There have been no prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the ESPB in the emergency department setting for acute rib fractures. The investigators hypothesize that the ESPB will provide improved acute pain scores in the emergency department compared to parental analgesia alone. Secondarily, investigators hypothesize that this will translate to less inpatient opioid requirements and improved incentive spirometry values.
Recently in 2016, a new interfascial plane nerve block was developed for thoracic analgesia known as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB). Since its development for thoracic neuropathic pain, the ESPB has been shown to be effective in pain control in multiple procedures including thoracotomies. However, there have been a few published case reports of using ESPB for analgesia in rib fracture management and only one retrospective study which demonstrated improved NRS pain scores and increased incentive spirometry volumes (ICV) post-ESPB compared to pre-ESPB values. The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of ESPB as an alternative method to the current standard of care at Stanford Health Care (SHC) for pain management in traumatic rib fractures. At the investigator's institution, the current standard of care is intravenous (IV) and enteral multimodal analgesia that consists primarily of opioids and a continuous IV lidocaine infusion. Although IV lidocaine has shown some benefit in improving post-surgical pain scores, evidence for its use in MRF is lacking. The purpose of this study is to perform a randomized clinical trial comparing outcomes in pain control and incentive spirometry volumes between continuous ESPB catheters and IV lidocaine infusions in adult patients with acute traumatic rib fractures. The investigators want to determine if ESPB can provide improved pain control in patients admitted for traumatic rib fractures compared to IV Lidocaine. The aim is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of ESPB on OME consumption, pain scores, incentive spirometry volumes, cough strength, respiratory complications, inflammatory biomarkers and hospital LOS. Findings from this study can help improve analgesia, quality of care, and patient satisfaction at Stanford Healthcare and for other acute pain and trauma surgery providers. The aim of this study involves pain management for patients with acute traumatic rib fractures and therefore must involve human subjects.