Clinical Trials Logo

Rib Fracture Multiple clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Rib Fracture Multiple.

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05758870 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Rib Fracture Multiple

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Clinical Effects of Surgical and Non-surgical Treatment of Low Rib Fractures

Start date: April 1, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to explore the difference between the clinical effects of surgical and non-surgical treatment for patients with low rib fracture, and to explore whether SSRF has more clinical treatment advantages in patients with low rib fracture in a randomized, controlled and prospective manner.

NCT ID: NCT04892563 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Rib Fracture Multiple

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Rib Fracture Analgesia in the Emergency Department

Start date: July 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Rib fractures, while in isolation are self-limited and benign, can be exquisitely painful. Poorly controlled rib fracture pain can compromise respiratory function leading to increased morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly. Currently, opioid medications are the mainstay of analgesia but are associated with significant adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and delirium. In an effort to improve acute pain in the ED and concomitantly reduce opioid use, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has been implemented more frequently The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively new ultrasound-guided procedure for thoracic analgesia. Previously, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block has been used for this indication. However, typical anatomical distribution limits the effectiveness of the SAP block to anterior rib fractures, while the majority of traumatic rib fractures are posterior, thus require a more central blockade such as the proposed ESPB. The ESPB can be done as a single injection into the superficial structures of the back under ultrasound guidance and as such, is a both a relatively safe and technically easy procedure to perform, especially in comparison to the more traditional alternatives of epidurals, paravertebral and intercostal injections. There have been no prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the ESPB in the emergency department setting for acute rib fractures. The investigators hypothesize that the ESPB will provide improved acute pain scores in the emergency department compared to parental analgesia alone. Secondarily, investigators hypothesize that this will translate to less inpatient opioid requirements and improved incentive spirometry values.

NCT ID: NCT03883958 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Rib Fracture Multiple

Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Paravertebral Block for Pain Management in Fractured Ribs

Start date: December 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Rib fractures pose a significant healthcare burden with its associated morbidity, long term disability, and mortality. Pulmonary morbidity is increased in these patients as a result of diminished gas exchange from fracture induced pulmonary injury and from inadequate analgesia compromising both ventilation and pulmonary mechanics. Adequate analgesia is paramount in enhancing pulmonary hygiene aimed at preventing atelectasis and pneumonia. Numbing the nerves to the fractured ribs by injecting local anaesthetic (LA) improves breathing and reduces the risk of complications. Two techniques of regional anesthesia (erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and paravertebral block (PVB)) will be compared regarding their efficacy for treating pain caused by rib fractures. The LA is injected near nerves at two different locations. The PVB is immediately adjacent to the vertebrae, whereas the ESPB is slightly further away from the midline. Both techniques use ultrasound to ensure the LA is directed to the intended place. Adult patients with > 3 consecutive fractured ribs will be consented, then randomised to receive either a ESPB or a PVB. It is expected that both groups will significantly improve in terms of pain score, opioids need, and breathing ability, however it is unclear which technique will provide better results and less complications.