Clinical Trials Logo

Rhinoplasty clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Rhinoplasty.

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06384469 Not yet recruiting - Rhinoplasty Clinical Trials

The Impact of Rhinoplasty Approach and Used Autologous Cartilage Grafts on the Nasal Skin-soft Tissue Envelope Metabolism

Start date: January 2, 2025
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This is a prospective observation cohort investigation. Patients, that is participants, undergoing primary functional rhinoplasty will be evaluated in terms of measuring capillary blood lactic acid concentration in the nasal skin-soft tissue envelope immediately after the procedure and 7 days after the procedure. The aim of our study is to test whether or not different rhinoplasty approaches and volume of the used autologous cartilage grafts impact the nasal skin-soft tissue metabolism.

NCT ID: NCT03213548 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Aesthetic and Functional Results of Alar Base Modifications in Rhinoplasty

Start date: September 15, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Rhinoplasty is among the most accomplished aesthetic procedures in Plastic Surgery. The mastery of Alar Base modifications is essential for superior aesthetic results. The main indication is to reduce nasal width when it exceeds the intercanthal distance in Caucasian women. Other indications are the modification of the shape of the nostrils or to reduce alar flare in noses with too convex alar base. Since Wier's first description, a series of techniques has been developed with a common goal of making the basal view of the nose close to an equilateral triangle. The location and amount of tissue to be removed will be according to the preoperative or intraoperative indication due to changes in the alar base resulting from reductions in the projection of the nasal tip. One of the controversies in the literature is in the position of the incision in alar base modifications. Some authors prioritize incisions that do not violate the alar facial groove , since the groove region presents a greater number of sebaceous glands, leading to poor scarring results. Other authors have argued that incisions above the sulcus have caused more evident scars, anda that poor healing results would be more associated with aggressive resections of border and bad closing skin techniques. Due to divergence in the literature, the present study aims to compare, through a double blinded randomized clinical trial, two techniques of alar base modifications that will differentiate only by violating or not the alar facial groove.