View clinical trials related to Rhinitis.
Filter by:The study seeks to understand patients' satisfaction and importance of treatment attributes for Allergic Rhinitis nasal sprays from two brands (RYALTRIS® vs. DYMISTA®).
The main goal of this trial is to learn more about the safety of repeated dosing with Lu AG09222. The trial doctors will keep track of the participant's overall health by asking them how they are and by analyzing blood and urine samples.
Alleviation of allergic symptoms induced by house dust mites when using the medical device AM-301. This clinical investigation explores the efficacy and safety of AM-301 when used to reduce symptoms of house dust mite sufferers. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of AM-301 Device between treated and non-treated subjects in the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).
The purpose of this allergen challenge study is to assess the efficacy of IRL201104 compared with placebo in adult participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
As many as 250 million people suffer from allergic rhinitis in China, which has a large population, early use of drugs may help better control the symptoms.This study aimed to investigate the effects of early interventional treatment with the leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) montelukast on seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Re-evaluation of patients treated with intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) in terms of quality of life and therapeutic efficacy and comparison with subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) 15 years post immunotherapy
The purpose of study is to compared the impact of the integrative care clinic to ordinary western medicine among patients of moderate persistent allergic rhinitis combined with sleep disorder and establishing the collaborative care model of TCM and western medicine for pediatric allergic rhinitis with sleep disorder. Investigators invited children aged below 18 years old to the integrative care clinic as experimental group, who have persistent moderate allergic rhinitis, more than 60 scores of the OSA-18 sleep questionnaire, and can accept integrative therapy. The controlled group is patients who receive ordinary western treatment. Investigators compare these two groups by questionnaires of OSA-18,SN-5, PADQLQ,SNAP-IV, the dose of nasal corticosteroid , and polysomnography.
Seasonal allergic rhinitis has multiple consequences: sleep disturbances, fatigue, depressed mood, impaired quality of life and productivity, and co-morbid conditions such as asthma, which affects one third of AR patients. In Europe, more than 150 million people suffer from allergic rhinitis and more than 25 million suffer from asthma. About 30% have uncontrolled rhinitis during exposure to allergens. The impact of allergic diseases on work productivity is estimated to be between 30 and 50 billion € per year in the EU. Studies show that pollution can play a role in the amplification of the response to inhaled pollen allergens by inducing morphological and functional modifications of nasal and bronchial epithelia, but also by inducing structural modifications of allergenic molecules. However, although data show that the symptoms of AR are aggravated by exposure to air pollution, this effect is not observed for all pollens. The study area is very exposed to pollens (with a significant presence of cypress pollen) and air pollution, and presents a prevalence of asthma of 17% while the national average is about 7%. The aim of this study is to establish, if they exist, links between pollens of various species, air pollution and symptoms of allergic rhinitis. The knowledge of these links will allow public authorities to set up prevention actions, and patients to better manage their allergic rhinitis on a daily basis.
One hundred patients were enrolled, based on sensitization and doctor-diagnosed allergy to HDM. Questionnaires were administered to document demographic and clinical characteristics. Serum IgE reactivity toDermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dp) extract, Der p 1, Der p 2 and Der p 10 was measured by ImmunoCAP.
Allergen specific immunotherapy is currently the only curative intervention for allergic rhinitis (AR). Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) need to be reinstituted with an interruption of more than 16 weeks in maintenance period, leading to increased time and economic cost burden and difficulties for continuing further treatment for patients. The aim of present study was to develop a novel dose adjustment schedule for such situation and to compare the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions between novel and conventional schedules for dust mite (DM) SCIT of AR subjects.