View clinical trials related to Rhinitis.
Filter by:This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of desloratadine (MK-4117) in Japanese participants with perennial allergic rhinitis. The primary hypothesis is that desloratadine is superior to placebo after 2 weeks of treatment with regard to change from baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score among Japanese participants with perennial allergic rhinitis.
This phase IV investigational trial is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a 2-week treatment of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FPNS) vs. cetirizine on allergic nasal and ocular symptoms and quality of life in adult subjects with SAR. It is hypothesized that FPNS provides greater nasal symptom relief than cetirizine. The primary measure used to test this hypothesis is the change from baseline over two weeks in reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) compared between FPNS and cetirizine. Approximately 648 subjects will be randomized into a 1:1:1:1 ratio of treatment allocation across approximately twenty-five to thirty-five sites in the US during the 2013 fall allergy season. All subjects will be outpatients. The total duration of study will be approximately 21 days including 7 days of screening period, and 14 days of treatment period.
The purpose of this study is to determine if Dymista nasal spray is better and safer than placebo in treating children ages 4 to <12 years old who have seasonal allergic rhinitis.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of TAU-284 (Bepotastine besilate) in pediatric patients with perennial allergic rhinitis for 12 weeks administration.
Our central hypothesis is that dietary limitations introduced by food allergy will contribute to increased food insecurity in households with food allergic children when compared to food insecure households without food allergic children.
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety of 2 different doses of the investigational use of an allergy medication (Astepro Nasal Spray) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). This is an open-label study; that is, parent and child will know which group each is in.
Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is a widely used and effective treatment modality for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. SCIT starts with a build-up phase during which a patient receives frequent, escalating doses of the allergens they are allergic to until they reach a predetermined maintenance dose. This is followed by a maintenance phase during which the allergen dose is kept constant and administered at greater intervals. Maximum clinical improvement is generally not seen until a patient is in the maintenance phase. Anecdotal evidence of possible reactions to SCIT administered during a patient's pollen season has led to dosage freezes during a patient's pollen season which extends the length of the build-up phase by many months. Prolonging the buildup phase increases the time required to obtain maximal benefit from SCIT, and at the same time, can decrease patient compliance with therapy due to the prolonged period of time when frequent injections are required. The aims of this study are to determine if adverse reactions to pollen SCIT are increased if doses are increased during pollen season.
The proposed study will evaluate the unmet therapy need in seasonal rhinitis by aiming to answer the following research questions 1. What is the first prescription of the hay-fever season and how many of these patients are on some form of combination therapy? 2. To what extent does initial therapy not meet clinical need (as measured by need for additional medical intervention in terms of consultations and changes in therapy)? 3. Does treatment for allergic rhinitis differ for asthma Vs non-asthma and seasonal Vs perennial patients?
Capsaicin nasal spray is used in daily practice against IR without knowledge about the exact mechanisms involved in this treatment. Therefore, this study aims to address this issue by studying the functional (electrophysiologic) changes after specific stimulations in IR patients and healthy controls before and after capsaicin/placebo treatment.
The objectives of this study are: to confirm the superiority of TAU-284 over placebo after two weeks of administration to pediatric patients with perennial allergic rhinitis and to investigate safety of TAU-284.