View clinical trials related to Rhinitis.
Filter by:In this study, investigators evaluated for the first time the diagnostic efficacy of abioSCOPE® versus Phadia Laboratory System as an aid in the diagnosis of allergic diseases. Investigators targetted the agreement between test results obtained in abioSCOPE® and a laboratory reference method (Phadia Laboratory System, ThermoFisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden), considered as a quasi-gold standard in IgE (immunoglobulin E) antibody assays. Investigators also reported the medical decision taken by a panel of allergy experts who had access to patient history, skin tests and IgE antibody assay, but blinded to the method used, i,e, the reference method or the abioSCOPE® .
This study is a phase III clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of Dymista® Nasal Spray in comparison to Azep® nasal spray and Flixonase® nasal spray in Chinese patients aged ≥ 12 years with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis.
The objective of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MT-2990 in patients with Japanese cedar pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis (JC-SAR). Additional objective of the study is to investigate the efficacy and pharmacodynamics profile of MT-2990 in an environmental exposure chamber (EEC) on Day 8, 29, 57, and 85.
The primary objective is to assess whether 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as an adjunct to Timothy Grass Subcutaneous Immunotherapy (SCIT) improves upon the efficacy of Timothy Grass SCIT to reduce provoked allergic rhinitis symptoms, as measured by Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) with Timothy Grass extract at week 17. The secondary objectives of the study are: - To assess whether 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as compared to placebo reduces provoked allergic rhinitis symptoms, as measured by TNSS after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) with Timothy Grass extract - To assess whether 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as compared to dupilumab + SCIT reduces provoked allergic rhinitis symptoms, as measured by TNSS after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) with Timothy Grass extract - To assess changes in serum Timothy-grass-specific immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), serum Timothy grass-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), and ratio of serum Timothy Grass-specific IgG4 to IgE over 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab + SCIT as compared to SCIT monotherapy - To evaluate the safety and tolerability of 16 weeks of treatment with dupilumab as an adjunct to Timothy Grass SCIT
This study will be an open-label, randomized 2-way cross-over study to evaluate bioequivalence study between levocetirizine ODT and levocetirizine IRT in healthy Japanese male subjects. Approximately 48 subjects will participate in this study to receive a single dose treatments of levocetirizine ODT 5 milligram (mg) or levocetirizine IRT 5 mg. In Part 1, subjects will randomized in 1:1 ratio (12 in each Period) in Period 1 and 2 to receive single dose of levocetirizine ODT 5 mg with water or single dose levocetirizine IRT 5 mg with water in fasted state. In this part, comparison of bioavailability of levocetirizine ODT and levocetirizine IRT when taken with water in the fasted state will be assessed. In Part 2, subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio (12 in each Period) in Period 1 and 2 to receive single dose levocetirizine ODT 5 mg without water or single dose levocetirizine IRT 5 mg with water in fasted state. In this part, comparison of bioavailability of levocetirizine ODT without water and levocetirizine IRT with water in the fasted state will be assessed. There will be at least a 5-day wash out period between the intervention periods. The duration of each subject's participation in each part will be approximately 7 weeks from screening to follow-up.
The goal of this study is to compare ten current and readily available FDA approved allergy skin prick devices to determine the most sensitive and specific product and methods used for the diagnosis of allergic disease. The primary outcome will be to determine the analytical sensitivity and specificity of all ten skin prick devices by measuring wheal and flare response to histamine and control diluent in 1mm increments. Secondary outcomes include comparison of skin prick technique, optimum histamine concentration, patient comfort, reproducibility, and the comparability of high-resolution digital images.
In this study subjects self recorded nasal and ocular symptoms scores from exposure to ragweed pollen in an Allergen Challenge Chamber (ACC). This single site study of seasonal allergic rhinitis was designed to enroll up to 35 participants. These participants would be age 18-70, male and female, with a mixture of ethnic groups. The study would involve 2 phases: Screening and Exposure. In the Exposure phase, participants were exposed to pollen for up to 180 minutes.
Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 nasal spray (NS) compared with placebo NS in pediatric subjects (aged 6 to under 12 years) with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR).
This research aims to establish a panel of inflammatory biomarkers of the early (Histamine, Tryptase, ProstaglandineD2) and late (Interleukin-4, Interleukin-5, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-13, Eotaxin, Tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF), (Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1beta (MIP1ß)) phase response to nasal bolus allergen challenge (NAC) in subjects with out-of-season seasonal allergic rhinitis, suitable for future application in drug intervention studies of novel anti-allergy therapeutics.
A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of FDC olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate nasal spray (Molo; also referred as GSP 301) was conducted in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis. In this study, the efficacy and safety of two regimens (BID and QD) of the FDC (i.e. Molo 1 and Molo 2) were evaluated compared to placebo nasal spray, DYMISTA® and PATANASE®.