View clinical trials related to Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal.
Filter by:The objective of this clinical trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of cetirizine HCl syrup vs. loratadine syrup vs. placebo syrup in the treatment of SAR in children 6 to 11 years old.
Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 NS compared with placebo NS and individual monotherapy formulations for the treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (subjects 12 years of age and older)
The purpose is to obtain real-world information on how consumers are complying with the product labelling This study will coincide with the launch of Pirinase Hayfever Relief for Adults 0.05% Nasal Spray in the United Kingdom (UK).
This study is aimed at assessing the efficacy of supplementation with a mixture of three bifidobacteria , on the allergic rhinitis..The rhinitis symptoms were assessed by validated score ( TSS ) , for children aged between 4 and 17 years with allergic rhinitis parietaria , mild , moderate or severe , than children not supplemented . Secondary Objectives - The effectiveness of treatment by VAS : - Evaluation of the rescue medication consumption - Evaluation of quality of life ( using structured questionnaire ) - Evaluation of the frequency and school performance ( using structured questionnaire ) - Assessment of sleep quality and attention (through structured questionnaire ) - Satisfaction rating and satisfaction of parents - Evaluation of asthma exacerbations in children susceptible
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of 2L®ALERG over placebo in terms of efficacy on the symptoms of allergic rhinitis and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in patients with seasonal allergy to grass pollen, corrected according to rescue medication intake. The secondary objectives are to compare the allergy symptoms, the rescue medication intake, the quality of life and the safety in patients treated with 2L®ALERG or with a placebo. This is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, two-parallel group, interventional placebo-controlled study with a notified homeopathic medication, marketed since 2002. Fifty patients will be recruited per group to achieve 40 cases completed per group, i.e., a total of 100 patients included for 80 cases completed. Screening will be done before the peak of pollination and the treatment will be set up two months before traditional pollen peak, then visits at 3 months and 6 months, or end of the peak. The treatment will consist of 1 capsule daily, fasting morning, following the numerical order of 1 to 10 capsules for 6 months. The placebo will have the same form, colour, taste and aspect. The allowed concomitant treatments are the already established treatments for associated pathologies not liable to have an impact on the proper conduct of the study and the rescue medications allowed in the first-line adjuvant treatment (oral or topical antihistamines [nasal or eye] and eye cromoglycate, topical nasal corticosteroids [in case of failure or insufficiency of those above]). The prohibited treatments are the oral or injectable corticosteroids and the anti-leukotrienes.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the more efficient dose for the treatment of rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis against grass pollen allergy
Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSP 301 NS compared to placebo NS and to individual monotherapies (comparators) as well as the efficacy of these monotherapies (comparators) versus placebo NS over 14 days of study treatment
There is increasing evidence that the effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy to control symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis is related to the cumulative dose of allergen or allergoid administered during a single regimen of subcutaneous (SC) injections or of sublingual administration. The current therapeutic dose regimen for Grass MATA MPL is a course of four injections of 300, 800, 2000 and 2000 SU (Standardized Units), administered at weekly intervals (cumulative dose 5100 SU). Two new cumulative doses of the Grass MATA MPL 10200 SU and 18200 SU are being developed to compare with the current dose. The study is designed to explore the benefit/risk of increasing the cumulative allergen dose of the Grass MATA MPL immunotherapy comparing these doses with the current dose of Grass MATA MPL, Grass MATA (without MPL) and placebo.
This is a randomized, parallel, single center, double masked, vehicle controlled study. The purpose of this study is to determine the activity and safety of NS2 in patients with grass, tree or ragweed-pollen induced seasonal allergic conjunctivitis . Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive multiple doses of NS2 Ophthalmic Drops (0.5%) or NS2 Ophthalmic Drops Vehicle (0.0%). Free aldehydes are thought to be related to inflammatory conditions such as allergic conjunctivitis. NS2, a small molecule aldehyde trap, is being evaluated to determine whether it may decrease inflammation by lowering aldehyde levels.
gpASIT+TM product is based on highly purified allergen fragments obtained from grass pollen. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of a subcutaneous immunotherapy with gpASIT+™ in patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis compared to placebo.