View clinical trials related to Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal.
Filter by:This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, international, multicentre, confirmatory Phase III study in patients with grass pollen-related allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. After having given written informed consent, the patients will be examined to establish eligibility according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. The eligible patients will be randomised to Placebo or gpASIT+™ treatment according to a 1:1 ratio. Study treatment will be administered before the start of the pollen season in 2019
Primary Objectives: - To demonstrate that the aggravation of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms in the presence of pollutants is observed using an Environmental Exposure Unit. - To evaluate the efficacy of fexofenadine hydrochloride in subjects suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms aggravated in the presence of diesel exhaust particulates. Secondary Objective: To evaluate the safety of a single dose of fexofenadine hydrochloride 180 mg.
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common Ig-E mediated disease of nasal mucosa, induced by an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated reaction in the allergen-sensitized subjects, affecting 10% to 40% of the world population. AR could be divided into two kinds, perennial AR and seasonal AR (SAR). Allergen specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only etiological treatment available for AR. Traditionally, AIT is divided into 2 types, subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), both of which are effective and safe alternatives. The trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 72 eligible SAR patients, who were sensitized to sweet sagewort (artemisia annua), were enrolled into the trial, followed by either a 32-week SLIT schedule, where the maintenance dose would be reached within 5 weeks, or placebo SLIT schedule. Standardized depot preparations of sweet sagewort (artemisia annua) extract (Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China ) were administered by means of sublingual drops.
Pollen allergic rhinitis is a very common condition whose symptomatic treatment is not always sufficient or satisfactory. The indication for allergic immunotherapy (IT) therefore often arises. The indication is based on the interrogation of the patient (chronology and severity of symptoms) and skin tests. But the interrogation, necessarily retrospective, brings often vague information and skin tests can be positive for allergens that have no clinical role (cross allergies). The objective of the project is to help the clinician in the indication of the IT, on the one hand by setting up a prospective and computerized collection of symptoms by a computer logbook accessible by the mobile phone of the patient. on the other hand by performing on the patient's serum a molecular diagnosis allow the identification of the major allergens to which the patient is sensitized. The same study will be conducted in 7 centers in southern European countries in patients aged 10 to 60 years with pollinosis. The examinations added by the research will take place during two routine visits: during a first visit, these patients will answer a standardized questionnaire, have a battery of allergological skin tests and a blood sample for molecular diagnosis. An application will then be loaded on their mobile phone and they will record their symptoms and medication during the pollen season. During a second visit, at the end of the pollen season, the allergist, in view of the data collected in the electronic notebook and the results of the molecular diagnosis will be able to prescribe a possible IT.
The objective of this study is to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MT-2990 in patients with Japanese cedar pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis (JC-SAR). Additional objective of the study is to investigate the efficacy and pharmacodynamics profile of MT-2990 in an environmental exposure chamber (EEC) on Day 8, 29, 57, and 85.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential correlation of the results of allergen-specific skin prick tests (SPT) to that of allergen-specific microarray determination (microassay test). Subjects who meet enrollment criteria, after signing an IRB approved consent form, will perform a minor finger prick blood draw and blot to be mailed off for microassay analysis. Specific statistical analysis will be done to assess all potential correlations between SPT and microassay. This study design should enable assessment of the level of correlation between SPT results and microassay results for specified allergens within a cohort of subjects with allergic rhinitis.
Study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSP 301 nasal spray (NS) compared with placebo NS in pediatric subjects (aged 6 to under 12 years) with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR).
This research aims to establish a panel of inflammatory biomarkers of the early (Histamine, Tryptase, ProstaglandineD2) and late (Interleukin-4, Interleukin-5, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-13, Eotaxin, Tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF), (Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1beta (MIP1ß)) phase response to nasal bolus allergen challenge (NAC) in subjects with out-of-season seasonal allergic rhinitis, suitable for future application in drug intervention studies of novel anti-allergy therapeutics.
A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of FDC olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate nasal spray (Molo; also referred as GSP 301) was conducted in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis. In this study, the efficacy and safety of two regimens (BID and QD) of the FDC (i.e. Molo 1 and Molo 2) were evaluated compared to placebo nasal spray, DYMISTA® and PATANASE®.
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of omalizumab compared with placebo, on top of SoC (anti-histamine and nasal corticosteroid) in adult and adolescent patients with severe Japanese cedar pollinosis, whose symptoms were inadequately controlled despite the current recommended therapies (nasal corticosteroids plus one or more medications out of anti-histamine, leukotriene receptor antagonist, or prostaglandin D2/thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist) in the previous 2 Japanese cedar pollen seasons.