View clinical trials related to Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal.
Filter by:Allergic rhinitis might be caused by decreased resistance of nasal barrier to allergens and other environmental insults. About 20 % of the European population suffers from pollen allergies. Birch pollen allergic rhinitis is the most common allergic disease in the Scandinavia and it exists widely also in the Central Europe. Suffering and high costs of pollen allergies may be reduced by understanding the molecular biology of the nasal barriers during allergic response. Our aim is to observe the effect of season and birch pollen immunotherapy on the molecular biology of nasal epithelium and the microbiome.
The objective of this study is to determine the biological activity of Artemisia vulgaris allergen extract in histamine equivalent units (HEP) units, in order to be used as in-house reference preparation (IHRP).
This clinical validation study is aimed at establishing a birch pollen challenge in the Fraunhofer ECC in patients allergic to birch pollen. The symptoms will be recorded on a validated symptom score as Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), allowing to determine whether the challenge is dose dependent and reproducible.
The study will assess the efficacy and safety of SPARC1310 when compared to placebo and active control
We hypothesize that ear acupressure will be effective in treating seasonal allergic rhinitis by changing the immune parameters and the psychological impact factors are associated with ear acupressure treatment outcome.
This phase IV investigational trial is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a 2-week treatment of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FPNS) vs. cetirizine on allergic nasal and ocular symptoms and quality of life in adult subjects with SAR. It is hypothesized that FPNS provides greater nasal symptom relief than cetirizine. The primary measure used to test this hypothesis is the change from baseline over two weeks in reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) compared between FPNS and cetirizine. Approximately 648 subjects will be randomized into a 1:1:1:1 ratio of treatment allocation across approximately twenty-five to thirty-five sites in the US during the 2013 fall allergy season. All subjects will be outpatients. The total duration of study will be approximately 21 days including 7 days of screening period, and 14 days of treatment period.
The purpose of this study is to determine if Dymista nasal spray is better and safer than placebo in treating children ages 4 to <12 years old who have seasonal allergic rhinitis.
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of montelukast (MK-0476) in the treatment of Japanese pediatric participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). The primary hypothesis of this study is that montelukast is superior to placebo in the treatment of nasal symptoms in SAR.
The investigators hypothesize that treatment with QNASL will reduce nasal mucosal inflammation induced by the allergy season and prevent the changes in the microbiome caused by the allergy season.
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-Site Study to Compare the Clinical Equivalence of Mometasone Nasal Spray (Watson Laboratories, Inc) with NASONEX® Nasal Spray (Schering Corporation) in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis