Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Secukinumab at 12 Weeks Administered With an Intravenous (i.v.) or Subcutaneous (s.c.) Loading Regimen Compared to Placebo in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Treatment With Methotrexate
The study compared the efficacy and assessed the safety of secukinumab given as 3 intravenous (i.v.) loading doses or weekly sub-cutaneous (s.c.) loading doses, compared to placebo, followed by monthly s.c. injections in patients with active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) despite treatment with Methotrexate.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 221 |
Est. completion date | December 2013 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2013 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion criteria: - presence of RA classified by ACR 2010 revised criteria for at least 3 months before screening - must have been taking MTX for at least 3 months before randomization and must currently be on a stable dose of MTX for at least 4 weeks before randomization. - At Baseline: Disease activity criteria defined by >6 tender joints out of 68 and >6 swollen joints out of 66 and with at least 1 of the following at screening: Anti-CCP antibodies positive OR Rheumatoid Factor positive and with at least 1 of the following at screening: hsCRP = 10 mg/L OR ESR = 28 Exclusion criteria: - RA patients functional status class IV according to the ACR 1991 revised criteria - Previous exposure to secukinumab or any other biologic drug directly targeting IL-17 or IL-17 receptor - Previous exposure ever to an anti-TNF-a agent or any other immunomodulatory biologic agent (experimental or approved) - Patients taking high potency opioid analgesics (e.g., methadone, hydromorphone, or morphine) - Any therapy by intra-articular injections (e.g. corticosteroid, hyaluronan) required for treatment of arthritis within 4 weeks before randomization - Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply. |
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Bulgaria | Novartis Investigative Site | Pleven | |
Bulgaria | Novartis Investigative Site | Plovdiv | |
Bulgaria | Novartis Investigative Site | Plovdiv | |
Bulgaria | Novartis Investigative Site | Sevlievo | |
Bulgaria | Novartis Investigative Site | Sofia | |
Bulgaria | Novartis Investigative Site | Sofia | |
Bulgaria | Novartis Investigative Site | Sofia | |
Canada | Novartis Investigative Site | Sainte-Foy | Quebec |
Canada | Novartis Investigative Site | St. John's | Newfoundland and Labrador |
Hungary | Novartis Investigative Site | Budapest | |
Hungary | Novartis Investigative Site | Debrecen | |
Hungary | Novartis Investigative Site | Szeged | |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Arenzano | GE |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Genova | GE |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Roma | RM |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Siena | SI |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Torino | TO |
Italy | Novartis Investigative Site | Valeggio Sul Mincio | (vr) |
Poland | Novartis Investigative Site | Bialystok | |
Poland | Novartis Investigative Site | Poznan | |
Poland | Novartis Investigative Site | Warszawa | |
Poland | Novartis Investigative Site | Warszawa | |
Puerto Rico | Novartis Investigative Site | San Juan | |
Slovakia | Novartis Investigative Site | Bardejov | Slovak Republic |
Slovakia | Novartis Investigative Site | Lucenec | |
Slovakia | Novartis Investigative Site | Partizánske | |
Slovakia | Novartis Investigative Site | Piestany | |
Slovakia | Novartis Investigative Site | Sabinov | |
Slovakia | Novartis Investigative Site | Stara Lubovna | |
Slovakia | Novartis Investigative Site | Topolcany | |
Slovakia | Novartis Investigative Site | Trnava | Slovensko |
United States | Novartis Investigative Site | Bowling Green | Kentucky |
United States | Novartis Investigative Site | Jackson | Tennessee |
United States | Novartis Investigative Site | Lincoln | Nebraska |
United States | Novartis Investigative Site | Nashville | Tennessee |
United States | Novartis Investigative Site | Peoria | Arizona |
United States | Novartis Investigative Site | Tupelo | Mississippi |
United States | Novartis Investigative Site | Upland | California |
United States | Novartis Investigative Site | Vestavia | Alabama |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Novartis Pharmaceuticals |
United States, Bulgaria, Canada, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Puerto Rico, Slovakia,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieve American College of Rheumatology Response of 20 (ACR20) | A participant was considered to be a responder according to the ACR20 criteria if the participant had at least 20% improvement in both the tender joint count and swollen joint count measures, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ©) score, and/or C-reactive protein (CRP)/Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR). | 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ACR50 and ACR70 | A participant was considered to be a responder according to the ACR50 or ACR70 criteria if the participant had at least 50% or 70% improvement, respectively, in both the tender joint count and swollen joint count measures, and in at least 3 of the following 5 measures: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ©) score, and/or C-reactive protein (CRP)/Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR). | 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Score. | The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. In this trial, only the disability dimension was used. The disability dimension consists of 20 multiple choice items concerning difficulty in performing 8 common activities of daily living; dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, reaching, personal hygiene, gripping and activities. Participants choose from four response categories: 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty) and 3 (unable to do). Within each of the 8 categories, only the item indicating the most severe impairment contributes to the category score. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | baseline, 12 Weeks | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in DAS28 Using High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) (DAS28-CRP) | The Disease Activity Score (DAS) is a combined index to measure disease activity in RA participants. DAS28-CRP is determined using the following variables: 28-joint counts (tender28 and swollen28), CRP, and the participant's general health (GH) or global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm (0 = and 100 = ). Using the data from these variables, DAS28-CRP is calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4(crp) = 0.56*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014*GH + 0.96. The calculation results in a DAS28-CRP score from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis of your patient. A DAS28 above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | baseline, 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 Response Using ESR (DAS28-ESR) | The Disease Activity Score (DAS) is a combined index to measure disease activity in RA participants. DAS28 is determined using the following variables: 28-joint counts (tender28 and swollen28), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the participant's general health (GH) or global disease activity measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 mm (0 = and 100 = ). Using the data from these variables, DAS28-ESR is calculated using the following formula: DAS28 = 0.56 * sqrt(tender28) + 0.28 * sqrt(swollen28) + 0.70 * ln(ESR) + 0.014 * GH. The calculation results in a DAS28-ESR score from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis of your patient. A DAS28 above 5.1 means high disease activity whereas a DAS28 below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. Remission is achieved by a DAS28 lower than 2.6. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | baseline, 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response | EULAR response criteria are based on DAS28 status in combination with DAS28 improvements. The EULAR response criteria are as follows: present DAS28 <3.2 with DAS28 improvement >1.2 corresponds to 'good response'; present DAS28 <3.2 with DAS28 improvement between 0.6 to 1.2, or present DAS28 between 3.2 to 5.1 with DAS28 improvement from 0.6 to >1.2, or present DAS28 >5.2 with DAS28 improvement >1.2 correspond to 'moderate response; present DAS28 <3.2 with DAS28 improvement <0.6, or present DAS28 between 3.2 to 5.1 with DAS28 improvement <0.6, or present DAS28 >5.1 with DAS28 improvement <0.6 to 1.2 correspond to 'no response'. | baseline, 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Swollen 66-joint Count | The 66 joints assessed for swelling included the 8 distal interphalangeal, 10 proximal interphalangeal and 10 metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands, the 10 metatarsophalangeal and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows , 2 shoulders , 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Swelling was graded present (1) or absent (0). A negative change in baseline indicates improvement. | baseline, 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Tender 68-joint Count | The 68 joints assessed for tenderness included the 8 distal interphalangeal, 10 proximal interphalangeal and 10 metacarpophalangeal joints of the hands, the 10 metatarsophalangeal and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows , 2 shoulders , 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 hip, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Joint tenderness was graded present (1) or absent (0). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | baseline, 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Pain | The patient's assessment of pain was performed using 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (unbearable pain) after the question "Please indicate with a vertical mark through the horizontal line the most pain you had from your rheumatoid arthritis over the last 24 hours". A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | baseline, 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | The patient's global assessment of disease activity was performed using 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 (very good) to 100 (very poor), after the question "Considering all the ways rheumatoid arthritis affects you, please indicate with a vertical mark through the horizontal line how well you are doing today". A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | baseline, 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity | The physician's global assessment of disease activity was performed using 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 (very good) to 100 (very poor), after the question "Considering all the ways rheumatoid arthritis affects your patient, how would you rate his or her current condition?". A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | baseline, 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in hsCRP | Blood for this assessment was obtained to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor response to treatment. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | baseline, 12 weeks | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in ESR | Blood for this assessment was obtained to monitor disease activity and response to therapy. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | baseline, 12 weeks | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04226131 -
MusculRA: The Effects of Rheumatoid Arthritis on Skeletal Muscle Biomechanics
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04171414 -
A Study to Evaluate Usability of Subcutaneous Auto-injector of CT-P17 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02833350 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04255134 -
Biologics for Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain (BIORA-PAIN)
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05615246 -
Exactech Humeral Reconstruction Prosthesis of Shoulder Arthroplasty PMCF (HRP)
|
||
Completed |
NCT03248518 -
Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03514355 -
MBSR in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Controlled Disease But Persistent Depressive Symptoms
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06005220 -
SBD121, a Synbiotic Medical Food for RA Management
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05451615 -
Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Combined With JAK Inhibitor for Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT05054920 -
Eccentric Versus Concentric Exercises for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02037737 -
Impact and Use of Abatacept IV for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Real Life Setting
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04079374 -
Comparative Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Etanercept and Enbrel
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02504268 -
Effects of Abatacept in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05496855 -
Remote Care in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05051943 -
A Study of the Real-world Use of an Adalimumab Biosimilar and Evaluation of Nutritional Status on the Therapeutic Response
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06031415 -
Study of GS-0272 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06103773 -
A Study of Single and Multiple Oral Doses of TollB-001
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT05999266 -
The Cartilage and Muscle Thickness on Knee Pain in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05302934 -
Evaluation of the PHENO4U Data Platform in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04169100 -
Novel Form of Acquired Long QT Syndrome
|
Phase 4 |