Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00977106
Other study ID # ML22017
Secondary ID 2008-008309-23
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received August 18, 2009
Last updated September 15, 2014
Start date June 2009
Est. completion date October 2011

Study information

Verified date September 2014
Source Hoffmann-La Roche
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis)
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will assess the onset and maintenance of effect of tocilizumab on relief in patients with active moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to DMARDs or anti-TNF. For the first, double-blind, part of the study patients will be randomized to receive an iv infusion of either 8mg/kg tocilizumab or placebo. After 4 weeks this will be followed by 11 months treatment with tocilizumab 8mg/kg iv infusion every 4 weeks. Methotrexate or DMARD therapy will be continued throughout study treatment. Target sample size is >100.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 103
Est. completion date October 2011
Est. primary completion date October 2011
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- adult patients >/= 18 years of age

- active moderate or severe rheumatoid arthritis of <10 years duration with inadequate response to methotrexate or anti-TNF

- on methotrexate treatment for at least 10 weeks, at least 8 weeks on stable dose

- patients receiving oral corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs should be at stable dose for 4 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

- rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA, or significant systemic involvement secondary to RA

- functional class IV by ACR classification

- history of inflammatory joint disease other than RA

- previous treatment with cell-depleting therapies, abatacept or rituximab

- active current or history of recurrent infection, or any major episode of infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with iv antibiotics <4 weeks or oral antibiotics <2 weeks prior to screening

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
single iv infusion 8 mg/kg
placebo
single iv infusion
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
iv infusion 8mg/kg every 4 weeks for 11 months

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Hoffmann-La Roche

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 4 HAQ-DI includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0 (equals)=without difficulties; 1= with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3. Relevant clinical improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 0.22 points in HAQ-DI. Week 4 No
Secondary Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Participants were asked to rate their assessment of disease activity using a visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 to 100 millimeters (mm), where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Open Treatment Period Participants were asked to rate their assessment of disease activity using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 No
Secondary Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Physicians were asked to assess disease activity of the participants using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Physicians were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline and Week 4 No
Secondary Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity During the Open Treatment Period Physicians were asked to assess disease activity of the participants using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no symptoms and 100 represented severe symptoms. Physicians were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary Patient Global Assessment of Pain During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Participants were asked to rate their assessment of pain using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no pain and 100 represented intolerable pain. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline and Week 4 No
Secondary Patient Global Assessment of Pain During the Open Treatment Period Participants were asked to rate their assessment of pain using a VAS of 0 to 100 mm, where 0 represented no pain and 100 represented intolerable pain. Participants were asked to mark the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the left edge was measured. A negative value in change from Baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary Synovitis Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Assessed Using B-Mode Ultrasound Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 metacarpal phalangeal [MCP; left and right] joints, 5 proximal interphalangeal [PIP; left and right] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 metatarsal phalangeal [MTP; left and right] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120. A score of 0 indicated no damage and a score of 120 indicated most severe damage. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Synovitis Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Assessed Using Power Doppler Ultrasound Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120 (higher score=more severe disease). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score During the Open Treatment Period Assessed Using B-Mode Ultrasound Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120 (higher score=more severe disease). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Relative change was the percentage (%) change from baseline. Weeks 12, 24, and 48 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Synovitis Score During the Open Treatment Period Assessed Using Power Doppler Ultrasound Synovitis was assessed by ultrasonography (B-mode ultrasound and Power Doppler) and scored from "0" to "3", for each of 40 joints (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right] joints, left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints); synovitis scores were calculated by adding the sum of scores for each joint for a total score ranging from 0 to 120 (higher score=more severe disease). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Relative change was the percentage change from baseline. Weeks 12, 24, and 48 No
Secondary Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is a biological marker of inflammation, measured in mm per hour (mm/hr). A reduction in ESR indicates improvement. Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Double-Blind Treatment Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is a biological marker of inflammation. A negative change indicates improvement. Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate During the Open Treatment Period Erythrocyte sedimentation rate is a biological marker of inflammation, measured in mm/hr. A reduction in ESR indicates improvement. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary C-Reactive Protein During the Double-Blind Treatment Period C-Reactive protein (CRP) is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). A reduction in CRP indicates improvement. Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein During the Double-Blind Treatment Period C-Reactive protein (CRP) is a biological marker of inflammation. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary C- Reactive Protein During the Open Treatment Period C-reactive protein is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary Serum Amyloid A Component During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Serum Amyloid A (SAA) component is a biological marker of inflammation and is measured in mg/L. A reduction in SAA indicates improvement. Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Amyloid A Component During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Serum Amyloid A (SAA) component is a biological marker of inflammation. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Serum Amyloid A Component During the Open Treatment Period Serum Amyloid A (SAA) component is a biological marker of inflammation measured in mg/L. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Open Treatment Period Beta 2 Microglobulin is a biological marker of inflammation measured in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL). Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Beta 2 Microglobulin is a biological marker of inflammation measured in micrograms per milliliter (mcg/mL). Baseline, Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in Beta 2 Microglobulin Levels During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Beta 2 Microglobulin is a biological marker of inflammation. If baseline value was equal to 0, it was replaced by 0.1 to calculate the change from baseline. Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Bone Mineral Density To describe bone mineral density (BMD), standardized values were calculated for lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck, and trochanter, taking into account the type of Dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) used. All DXA at baseline were taken into account (done from before screening to Week 8). DXA at end of study were taken into account if they were done after at least 6 infusions of tocilizumab. Values were measured in milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm^2). Baseline and Week 48 No
Secondary Percentage of Participants Treated With Corticosteroids Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period Baseline, Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48 No
Secondary S-Sclerostin and P-Dkk1 (Wnt Signaling Inhibitor Dickkopf) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period S-Sclerostin and P-Dkk1 are biological markers of bone and cartilage metabolism measured as picograms/milliliter (pg/mL). Baseline is the closest value plus or minus (+/-) 1 month around the first tocilizumab infusion. If values before and after the first infusion were eligible, the value before was taken into account. Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, and 48 No
Secondary Serum Procollagen Type II N-Propeptide (s-PIINP), Serum Procollagen Type I N Propeptide (s-PINP), and Serum Carboxy-Terminal Collagen Crosslinks-1 (s-CTX-I) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period S-PIIINP, S-CTX-I, and S-PINP are biological markers of bone and cartilage metabolism. Baseline is the closest value +/- 1 month around the first tocilizumab infusion. If values before and after the first infusion were eligible, the value before was taken into account. Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, and 48 No
Secondary Serum Osteogenic Growth Peptide (s-OGP) Over the 1-Year Tocilizumab Period S-OGP is a biological marker of bone and cartilage metabolism measured as picomoles per liter (pmol/L). Baseline is the closest value +/- 1 month around the first tocilizumab infusion. If values before and after the first infusion were eligible, the value before was taken into account. Baseline and Weeks 12 and 48 No
Secondary Weekly Methotrexate (MTX) Dose Before entering the study, participants had to be treated with MTX for at least 12 weeks and at a stable dose for at least 8 weeks before the screening visit (10-25 mg per week [mg/week] of oral or parenteral MTX). During the study, treatment with MTX had to be stable during the first month and then could be continued or modified, at the investigator's discretion. Baseline and Weeks 24 and 48 No
Secondary HAQ-DI During the Double-Blind Treatment Period HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Screening and Week 4 No
Secondary HAQ-DI During the Open Treatment Period HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness in Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Day 0, Week 1, and Week 4 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in FACIT-F During the Double-Blind Treatment Period FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Week 1 and Week 4 No
Secondary FACIT-F During the Open Treatment Period FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-F score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. Baseline = Last available value before Day 0 (screening or Day 0) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Day 0 and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for participants with first tocilizumab infusion at Week 4. Baseline, Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary Hemoglobin Concentration During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Hemoglobin concentrations were determined at each visit to evaluate anemia in participants and measured as grams per deciliter (g/dL). Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Hemoglobin Concentration During the Open Treatment Period Hemoglobin concentrations were determined at each visit to evaluate anemia in participants and measured as g/dL. Baseline, Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48 No
Secondary Tender Joint Count (TJC) Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise. Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in TJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28. Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary TJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0), giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 28. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group. Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Forty joints were assessed for tenderness (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 40. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise. Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Forty joints were assessed for tenderness (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 40. Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary TJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period Forty joints were assessed for tenderness (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 40. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group. Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise. Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in SJC Based on 28-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28. Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Based on 28-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints) . Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group. Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary SJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Forty joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 40. Baseline = value at Day 0 if available, value at screening otherwise. Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary Percent Change From Baseline in SJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Double-Blind Treatment Period Forty joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 40. Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary SJC Based on 40-Joint Count During the Open Treatment Period Forty joints were assessed for swelling (5 MCP [left and right] joints, 5 PIP [left and right joints], left and right wrists, elbows, shoulders, knees, and ankles, and 5 MTP [left and right] joints). Joints were classified as swollen (1)/not swollen (0) for a total possible score of 0 to 40. Baseline = Last value available before Day 0 (selection or Day 0) for placebo and last value available before Week 4 (Week 1 or Week 4) for tocilizumab group. Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (=3.2) = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary DAS28 During the Open Treatment Period DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (=3.2) = low disease activity, DAS28 greater than (>)3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity. Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
Secondary Disease Activity Score Based on 40-Joints Count (DAS40) During the Double-Blind Treatment Period DAS40 calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 40-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Baseline and Weeks 1 and 4 No
Secondary DAS40 During the Open Treatment Period DAS40 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 40-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS40 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Baseline and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48 No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04226131 - MusculRA: The Effects of Rheumatoid Arthritis on Skeletal Muscle Biomechanics N/A
Completed NCT04171414 - A Study to Evaluate Usability of Subcutaneous Auto-injector of CT-P17 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT02833350 - Safety and Efficacy Study of GDC-0853 Compared With Placebo and Adalimumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Phase 2
Completed NCT04255134 - Biologics for Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain (BIORA-PAIN) Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05615246 - Exactech Humeral Reconstruction Prosthesis of Shoulder Arthroplasty PMCF (HRP)
Completed NCT03248518 - Lessening the Impact of Fatigue in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases N/A
Completed NCT03514355 - MBSR in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients With Controlled Disease But Persistent Depressive Symptoms N/A
Recruiting NCT06005220 - SBD121, a Synbiotic Medical Food for RA Management N/A
Recruiting NCT05451615 - Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Combined With JAK Inhibitor for Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 3
Completed NCT05054920 - Eccentric Versus Concentric Exercises for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis N/A
Completed NCT02037737 - Impact and Use of Abatacept IV for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Real Life Setting N/A
Recruiting NCT04079374 - Comparative Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Etanercept and Enbrel Phase 3
Completed NCT02504268 - Effects of Abatacept in Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05496855 - Remote Care in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis N/A
Completed NCT05051943 - A Study of the Real-world Use of an Adalimumab Biosimilar and Evaluation of Nutritional Status on the Therapeutic Response
Recruiting NCT06103773 - A Study of Single and Multiple Oral Doses of TollB-001 Phase 1
Recruiting NCT06031415 - Study of GS-0272 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis Phase 1
Completed NCT05999266 - The Cartilage and Muscle Thickness on Knee Pain in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Recruiting NCT05302934 - Evaluation of the PHENO4U Data Platform in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
Recruiting NCT04169100 - Novel Form of Acquired Long QT Syndrome Phase 4