The Effectiveness of a Functional Capacity Evaluation Among Persons on Sick Leave or Work Disability

Return to Work Clinical Trial

— FCE  

Official title:

The Effectiveness of a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) on the Return-to-work Process in Belgium: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06158464
• Other study ID #: FCE-study
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 14, 2023
• Est. completion date: August 31, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: January 2024
• Source: KU Leuven
• Contact: Jonas S Steel, PhD
• Phone: +3216373079
• Email: jonas.steel[@]kuleuven.be
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate Functional Capacity Evaluations in persons on sick leave or work disability. The main questions it aims to answer are:

• What is the impact of FCE on the person on sick leave/work disability (quantitative)

• What is the impact of FCE on the decision-making process by the medical advisor? (qualitative)

• What is the usability, feasibility and quality of FCE for the medical advisor, occupational therapist, mediators of the regional services, and return-to-work coordinators? (qualitative)

This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants in the control group will receive care-as-usual by the medical advisor. Participants in the intervention group will receive an FCE on top of care-as-usual. This is performed by an occupational therapist in their region, and a report of the FCE is delivered to the medical advisor. Both groups are asked to complete questionnaires at baseline, and after 3,6, and 9 months.

Researchers will compare questionnaire results from participants in the control and intervention group, to see if their workability (primary outcome), steps to return to work, expectations to return to work, return to work beliefs, time until (partial) reintegration, self-efficacy in return to work, pain scale, and illness perception (secondary outcomes) are affected differently.

Description:

This research project on the use of Functional Capacity Evaluations (FCE) within the context of benefit insurance in Belgium falls under the joint control of the National Institute for Sickness and Disability Insurance (RIZIV), the Haute École de Leonard Vinci and KU Leuven . KU Leuven hereby acts as the study's principal, but together with RIZIV and Haute École determines the objectives of the study as joint controllers.

An FCE consists of the evaluation of functional capacities based on medical reporting, observations and/or a series of standardised tests performed by an occupational therapist. This evaluation can give socially insured persons and medical advisors of the mutualities more insight into the participation possibilities of the socially insured person in function of the previous or next job. To date, the advisory doctor does not yet have the opportunity to have these evaluations carried out in Belgium. The aim of this study is therefore to examine the impact of these FCEs with regard to people on incapacity for work who meet the following conditions:

1. Belgian citizens on sick leave or work disability who meet the criteria determined by the article 100§1 and 100 §2 of the coordinated law of 14 July 1994, or by article 19 and/or 20 of the RD 20 July 1971.

2. The person's medical situation is stabilised (no significant evolution due to illness, procedure, treatment)

3. It is not a purely mental/psychiatric disorder

4. From the point of view of the consulting physician, there is a lack of consistent information on the capacity to return to work

5. Inclusion takes place from the 6th month of incapacity

6. The person is of working age: 18-65 years

In this RCT, 10 consulting physicians, 30 occupational therapists, and 200 persons on incapacity will be recruited. Then, persons on sick leave/work disability are randomly divided into two groups: 1) Persons in the control group receive the usual counselling by the medical advisor. 2) Persons in the intervention group receive usual care and an FCE. In the latter group, the person on sick leave is matched by the researchers to an occupational therapist in his region, and is invited to a FCE. After the evaluation, the person reviews the results with the occupational therapist, and a report of the FCE is provided to the medical advisor. Finally, the person is contacted by the medical advisor if they wish to take certain actions as a result of the FCE report. To measure the impact of the FCE, the intervention and control groups thereby complete a questionnaire at four points in time: at baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months, and after 9 months. This questionnaire is composed of validated instruments, and in addition to background characteristics, it questions work ability, self-efficacy, expectations of returning to work, any (steps taken to) return to work, pain intensity, illness perception, and beliefs regarding returning to work.

As a second objective, the impact on the medical advisors' (and other parties') decision-making process will be investigated through qualitative interviews and focus groups. To this end, a process evaluation will be conducted. This includes an examination of the implementation of the study, the usability, feasibility and quality of FCEs and their reporting, and the underlying causal mechanisms of the intervention. Using interviews and focus groups with medical advisors the impact of the FCE on the decision-making process will be investigated. Using interviews with occupational therapists, return-to-work coordinators and mediators of the regional services the usability, feasibility and quality of the FCE will be investigated.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 200
• Est. completion date: August 31, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: August 31, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• persons on sick leave or work disability (according to Belgian law)

• The person on sick leave/work disability is affected by an illness/injury that is considered stabilized (no significant medical evolution of the disease, nor a medical procedure or acute treatment is expected).

• The illness/injury of the person on sick leave/work disability is not mainly a mental/psychiatric disorder.

• From the point of view of the medical advisor, there is a lack of consistent information on the person on sick leave/work disability's capacity to return-to-work.

• Inclusion takes place from the 6th month of incapacity for work.

• The person on sick leave/work disability is of working age (18-65).

Exclusion Criteria:

• In the case of an accident at workplace, the medical condition of the person on sick leave/work disability has not yet been declared consolidated, meaning that the condition does not progress significantly, either naturally or with treatment.

• The medical advisor of the mutual health insurance is expecting in the near future: 1) a spontaneous return to work (total or partial), 2) a registration as a job-seeker, or 3) an end of the recognition of the work disability.

• The person on sick leave/work disability is pregnant.

• The medical advisor of the mutual health insurance perceives the person on sick leave/work disability does not have sufficient work capacity.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Absenteeism
• Return to Work
• Sick Leave

Intervention

Other:
• Functional Capacity Evaluation
In a FCE, an occupational therapist will evaluate a patient's ability to perform work-related tasks, using a battery of tests. Depending on the circumstances, he/she will for instance test fatigue, ask the patient to kneel, lift objects, or assess concentration. This assessment lasts ± 4 hours and includes physical tests and tests related to the (previous or reference) profession of the client. This means that an explicit match is made between the functional capacities of the patient (what is he/she capable of) and the demands of a certain job (what is he/she expected to do). Following this assessment, the occupational therapist will explain the results of this assessment to the patient. The evaluation will therefore take place during one or two visits.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Belgium	MC Hainaut	Anderlues
Belgium	LM Plus Antwerpen	Antwerp
Belgium	Helan/Medisch kabinet Genk	Genk
Belgium	CM Gent	Gent
Belgium	CM Vlaams-Brabant	Leuven
Belgium	MC Liège	Liège
Belgium	CM Oostende	Oostende
Belgium	Mutsoc Luxembourg	Saint-Hubert

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
KU Leuven	Haute École Léonard de Vinci, National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI), Belgium

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Workability	The single-item first WAI (Work Ability Index) question is a self-report question in which the person rates his "current work ability compared with the lifetime best", with a score of 0 ("completely unable to work") up to 10 ("work ability at its lifetime best").	measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary	Self-efficacy in the context of return-to-work	The self-efficacy return to work scale is a 10 item self-report questionnaire consisting of three subdomains of self-efficacy: (1) ability to cope with pain, (2) ability to obtain help from supervisor, and (3) ability to obtain help from co-workers. (Brouwer et al., 2009, 2010). There are five response options; for each item the person is asked to rate his/her confidence on a five-point scale (0 = not at all certain, 4 = completely certain). Subscores and an overall score (i.e., summative score) can be obtained, with higher scores indicating better return-to-work self-efficacy.	measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary	Expectations to return-to-work	A single-item question "To what extent do you think you will return to work?" with the 4 response options: 1 (to a low degree); 2 (to a certain degree); 3 (to a high degree); 4 (do not know)	measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary	Steps to return-to-work	The participants indicate which steps they have undertaken in their return-to-work, multiple answers are possible. Answers range from following training programmes, looking for jobs, undergoing work-oriented rehabilitation, to returning to work at a new or former employee.	measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary	Pain scale	The Graded Chronic Pain Scale Revised (GCPS-R) is a 5-item self-report questionnaire assessing (1) current pain, (2) limitations in life or work abilities, (3) general pain, (4) enjoyment of life, (5) interference with general activity. For items 1 and 2, responses options are Never/Some days/Most days/Everyday, for items 3 responses options are the following: from 0 (No pain) to 10 (Pain as bad as you can imagine) while for items 4 and 5 responses options are the following : from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).	measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary	Illness perception	The Brief IPQ has nine items, it is designed to measure patients' cognitive and emotional representations of their illness including consequences (item 1), timeline (item 2), personal control (item 3), treatment control (item 4), identity (item 5), coherence (item 6), concern (item 7), emotional response (item 8), and causes (item 9) (Broadbent et al., 2006). All of the items except the causal question are rated using a 0-to 10 response scale. Increases in item scores represent linear increases in the dimension measured.	measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline
Secondary	Return-to-work beliefs	The RTW Beliefs questionnaire is composed of 12 items divided into four subscale of general direct measures: intention (i.e., "I expect to/want to/intend to …"), attitude (i.e., "RTW is for me: harmful-beneficial/ good-bad/pleasant-unpleasant/worthless-useful"), subjective norms (i.e., "It is expected of me that I should … /I feel under social pressure to … /People who are important to me want me to …" ) , and perceived behavioural control (i.e., "I'm confident that I could … / for me RTW is (easy-difficult).	measured at baseline, and 3, 6 and 9 months post baseline