View clinical trials related to Retinal Vein Occlusion.
Filter by:to determine the effectivness of intravitreal avastin injection on visual acuity on people that suffer from central retinal vein occlusion
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of an intravitreal implant of dexamethasone (DDS-25) for the treatment of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion.
This study will assess the safety and efficacy of 700 μg dexamethasone Posterior Segment Drug Delivery System (DEX PS DDS) Applicator System in patients with macular edema in a 6 month double-blind period versus sham followed by a 2 month open label period.
Since 2004, intravitreal injection of Avastin, Lucentis, and Macugen for wet age-related macular degeneration, retinal vein occlusion, and diabetic macular edema are being administered in the United States at increasing rates. A 2010 study showed that in Canada and the incidence of injections grew 8 fold from 2005 to 2007 to 25.9 injections per 100,000 citizens. (Campbell 2010) In 2009, in the United States, over 1 million intravitreal injections were administered to Medicare beneficiaries. (Wykoff 2011) In the year 2011, the four doctors in my retina group administered a total of 6,494 intravitreal injections; in 2010, we administered 5021 intravitreal injections. Even though intravitreal injections are commonly administered, the optimal method of anesthetizing the eye prior to injection has yet to be determined. Some physicians use an anesthetic drop, some a soaked cotton pledget, some use an anesthetic gel and some use subconjunctival injected anesthetic. In 2009, the last time the Procedures and Trends Survey (PAT) (Mittra 2009) conducted by the American Society of Retina Specialists (the largest retina society in the world) asked about anesthetic methods for administering intravitreal injections, the following response was given by the 433 respondents: - Topical anesthetic drop: 21.48% - Topical viscous anesthetic: 23.33% - Topical anesthetic & soaked cotton-tip or pledget: 29.79% - Subconjunctival injection of anesthetic: 24.02% - Other: 1.39% An editorial in 2011 in the journal Retina, discusses the lack of good studies assessing optimal anesthetic prior to intravitreal injections. (Prenner 2011).
The primary objective is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with macular edema secondary to a retinal vein occlusion (branch or central) as determined by the change in best-corrected visual acuity in the study eye from baseline to month 6.
Epidemiological study of Ozurdex® in sites treating patients with retinal vein occlusion.
This study compares the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy only or combined therapy of posterior subtenon's triamcinolone acetonide and intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion.
This study will generate comparative data for 0.5-mg ranibizumab using PRN dosing administered with or without adjunctive laser treatment versus laser photocoagulation (the current standard of care) up to Month 6 in patients with visual impairment due to ME secondary to BRVO. Additionally the results of this study will provide long-term (24-month) safety and efficacy data for ranibizumab, administered with or without adjunctive laser treatment in this indication.
Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a common cause of vision loss, typically affecting individuals during the fifth through seventh decade of life. Eyes with severe CRVO have a poor visual prognosis because current treatments address only secondary complications of CRVO without treating its cause. Intra-ophthalmic artery injection of a small dose of t-PA (clot busting medicine), also called intra-ophthalmic artery thrombolysis, may reopen the central retinal vein-and address the cause of the disease- without exposing the subject to the risks of systemic thrombolysis. Our project aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-ophthalmic artery thrombolysis in subjects with CRVO.
This study seeks to compare dexamethasone implant with rescue intravitreal ranibizumab to monthly intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of macular edema secondary to branch or central retinal vein occlusion. This is based on the null hypothesis that dexamethasone implant with rescue ranibizumab has inferior best corrected visual acuity at six months compared to monthly ranibizumab alone.