Evaluation of Clinical Tool to Improve Adherence to Ventilator Management at UM

Respiratory Therapy Clinical Trial

Official title:

Evaluation of Clinical Tool to Improve Adherence to Ventilator Management Protocols and Standardized Shift Reports at UM

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05661695
• Other study ID #: RTA 11-02
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 31, 2024
• Est. completion date: May 31, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: August 2023
• Source: Convergent Engineering, Inc.
• Contact: Neil R Euliano, PhD
• Phone: 3523784899
• Email: neil[@]conveng.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Respiratory Therapists (RTs) have difficulty maintaining compliance with protocols and making efficient handoff communication. This project will evaluate the effectiveness of an electronic tool that will display a dashboard of key information on all the RTs patients and provide reminders that indicate whether evidence-based practice protocols are being followed. In addition, it will collect data from medical devices and the EMR and outline key information in the appropriate format to help standardize and improve handoff communication. The study will first collect blind baseline data for comparison with protocol adherence and silently evaluate shift change handoffs. In the second stage, the electronic tool will be installed and used to evaluate whether protocol compliance and shift change handoff is improved.

Description:

Background:

Respiratory Therapists (RTs) face challenges to provide high quality patient care including maintaining compliance with evidence-based practice protocols using lung protective ventilation (LPV) (tidal volume [VT] 4 to 8 ml predicted body weight and plateau pressure [Pplt] < 30 cm H2O), efficient communication during patient handoffs at shift changes and maintaining situational awareness amidst a high patient-to-clinician ratio and elevated acuity of patient care. Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) guidelines, initially published by ARDS Net and supported by the American Thoracic Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. LPV guidelines recommend use of low tidal volume (VT) (6 to 8 ml predicted body weight [PBW]) and inspiratory plateau pressure (Pplt) (≤ 30 cm H2O), proven to lower mortality in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, several studies revealed that many clinicians and institutions are not effectively implementing LPV guidelines many years after their publication in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2000. Clinicians who are unable and/or unwilling to apply low VT and Pplt as defined above jeopardize patient safety and risk increased mortality. One study found only 27% of patients received low VT and Pplt within 48 hours of the onset of ARDS. It was also found that ". . . adoption of evidence-based mechanical ventilation in real world practice has been disturbingly slow."

Another daily challenge faced by an RRT is the transfer of vital patient information during shift changes. A less than optimal "patient hand-off" or communication of relevant patient care information during shift changes appears to be a major factor in preventable medical errors directly affecting patient safety. The primary objective of a patient hand-off is to provide accurate information about the patient's care, treatment and services, current condition and any recent or anticipated changes. While appearing to be relatively easy task, a comprehensive, high-quality patient hand-off can be a complex communication procedure. One study found that patient hand-off communication failures were responsible for 30% of malpractice claims in U.S. hospitals, resulting in 1,744 deaths and $1.7 billion in malpractice costs over five years. While the use of computerized patient handoff methods are likely to promote improved information transfer during patient hand-offs, there is a dearth of such easy-to-use, portable communication tools available for RTs. Other contributing factors adversely affecting patient hand-off communication appear to be unrecognized patient needs due to lack of accurate and real time electronic monitoring, task interruption from nuisance alarms and inability to quickly determine the correct clinical decision.

RT Assistant, a bedside, portable and hand-held electronic tool, was designed to help the RT with these challenges.

Goals:

Evaluate the clinical effectiveness of RT Assistant software for the following:

Maintaining patients according to established LPV guidelines for ventilator-dependent patients Maintaining established low oxygen therapy guidelines Improving patient shift report communication Collect baseline data from the selected ICU passively through the SickBay data aggregator, including percentage of time patients are within the LPV and oxygenation guidelines.

Collect baseline data on shift report quality by passively monitoring shift reports between RTs during the above baseline data collection Install the RT Assistant software, train participating RTs, and compare baseline data with the same data collected in the same ICU during the use of the RT Assistant software

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 50
• Est. completion date: May 31, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: May 31, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Female
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

Practicing RTs are eligible to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

non-RTs or those who refuse to participate

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Respiratory Therapy

Intervention

Device:
• RT Assistant
RRT's will be given the RT Assistant to use during a regular ICU shift to make patient care decisions.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	University of Miami Health	Miami	Florida

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Convergent Engineering, Inc.	National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), University of Miami

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Respiratory Therapist Likert Scale Questionnaire	Questionnaire, score 1-10 (1 being the worst, 10 being the best)	through study completion, an average of 60 days