Evaluation the Non-Inferiority of Airmod to Capnostream™35

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is a multi-center clinical study of non-invasive medical device in Taiwan. After pre-anaesthesia evaluation, subjects who are suitable for intravenous general anesthesia (IVG) and age 20 years or older will be recruited in this clinical study. 150 subjects will be recruited at this site. The total 300 subjects will be recruited in other clinical centers at En Chu Kong Hospital simultaneously and Cathay General Hospital and Doctor Huang, Chien-Chung of the Anesthesia Department of MacKay Memorial Hospital is the PI of this study. The objective of this study is to evaluate the respiratory rate monitoring performance of "Airmod" respiratory monitoring assistant software, used with the "AccurSound Electronic Stethoscope AS-101" (TFDA Certificate No. 007347) compared to the "Medtronic Capnostream™35 Portable Respiratory Monitor" (TFDA Certificate No. 032283), hereinafter referred to as "comparison method", is non-inferiority than the comparison method. In addition, in order to improve the quality of patient care and ensure safety, this study will also synchronously record the breathing sounds from the " AccurSound Electronic Stethoscope " during the study with the respiratory symptoms of the comparison method, such as: asthma sounds, phlegm sounds, airway infiltration, water accumulation, obstructive sounds, respiratory arrest and respiratory tract edema, and analyze the vital signs for further improvement in the future. Primary Objective: To evaluate accuracy and performance of respiratory rate (RR) measurement from Airmod compared to the comparison method. The primary objective is to establish the non-inferiority. Secondary Objectives: 1. To assess the accuracy of respiratory ate measurement by Airmod comparison with manual-scored auscultation sound during the less sensitive period of Capnography on the comparison method. 2. To measure the agreement between AirRR* and ManCRR*. 3. To evaluate the response time of the first breath detection followed by administration of jaw thrust during the apnea period. The 3rd secondary objective is to compare the response time of Airmod versus the comparison method. 4. To compare the influence of subjects to variated breath rates on respiratory rate monitoring in bpm as measured by Airmod, manual-scored and the Capnostream™35. 5. To evaluate the safety and usability of Airmod. * AirRR Airmod-scored auscultation sound generated from AS-101 * ManCRR Manual-scored Capnography (ManCRR)originated from CapnostreamTM35 (K150272, Medtronic)

Clinical Trial Description

n/a

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Respiratory Rate

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05263791
Study type	Interventional
Source	Heroic Faith Medical Science Co., Ltd.
Contact	Yuan Ren Cheng, MS
Phone	+886918062948
Email	infie.cheng@heroic-faith.com
Status	Recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	May 2, 2022
Completion date	December 31, 2022

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT03832205` - Validation of Respiratory Rate and Heart Rate Measurements by Capaciflectors Placed in Four Locations on the Chest
Completed	`NCT04506684` - Reveal LINQ Respiration Clinical Study
Completed	`NCT03685227` - A Closer Look at Yoga Nidra: Sleep Lab Analyses	N/A
Completed	`NCT04179279` - Comparative Analysis of a Non-contact Respiratory and Heart Rate Monitor Vs. a Conventional Clinically Validated Reference Monitor
Completed	`NCT04077593` - On the PhonE Respiratory rAte Study (OPERA)
Completed	`NCT03750344` - ChroniSense Polso Wrist Worn Respiration Rate Validation Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT05366049` - The Effect of Methods Used in Oral Antipyretic Administration on the Vital Findings of the Child With Fever	N/A
Completed	`NCT03148873` - RespiraSense Versus Capnography & Manual Counting
Completed	`NCT05246358` - Respiratory Rate Validation Study - ChroniSense Polso	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05812378` - Respiratory Monitoring System Safety and Performance Study
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06292299` - The PARS Study: Paediatric Advanced Respiratory Service Study - An Observational Diagnostic Feasibility Study
Recruiting	`NCT05022264` - Remote Investigation and Assessment of Vital Signs
Completed	`NCT06086769` - High Flow Oxygen Therapy Effect on Healthy Subjects	N/A
Completed	`NCT04104737` - Spire Medical Health Tag Respiratory Rate Validation in Adults	N/A
Completed	`NCT04064645` - Bora Band Respiration Rate Study	N/A
Completed	`NCT01472133` - Validation of Respiration Rate Algorithms	N/A
Completed	`NCT03306537` - Sensor Validation Study - Quality Assurance
Active, not recruiting	`NCT03750318` - Validation Study on RENEW's Aingeal at KK Women's and Children's Hospital	N/A
Completed	`NCT03754231` - Validation Study on RENEW's Aingeal at KK Women's and Children's Hospital	N/A
Completed	`NCT04346498` - Can Kangarooing Small Babies on the Back of a Mother Keep Them Warm and Stable	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.