View clinical trials related to Respiratory Insufficiency.
Filter by:This is a prospective multi-center observational study which purpose is to evaluate the ability of blood-based inflammatory markers to risk-stratify patients hospitalized for Covid-19. Blood-based biomarkers examined include: soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, D-dimer, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase and interleukin-6.
Investigation of the association between PaCO2 change after extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) initiation and neurological outcome and mortality in neonates treated by ECMO for respiratory failure.
The present study is aimed to establish the epidemiological characteristics and clinical outcomes of mechanically ventilated children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), defined as PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mmHg on PEEP≥5 cmH2O and FiO2≥0.3, admitted in a network of pediatric hospitals in Spain.
The aim of the study is to evaluate if a check-list including lung ultrasonography can help to identify the etiology of the acute respiratory failure of patients managed at the emergency room. Adult patients admitted to the emergency room for acute respiratory failure will be offered the study. The emergency physician will perform a systematic examination using a checklist, including pulmonary embolism prediction scores, structured clinical examination and lung ultrasound, in order to establish a diagnostic hypothesis. A diagnostic hypothesis will be made after completion of the checklist. The emergency physician can perform additional examinations and treatment after completion of the checklist. The final diagnosis will be checked by an adjudication committee which will have all the documents established during the emergency room consultation and any hospitalization following this hospitalization. The main outcome will be the concordance rate between the diagnosis after the check-list and the final diagnosis.
Comparison of the effectiveness of three methods of non-invasive ventilation in patients with mild and moderate respiratory failure in the early postoperative period after cardiac surgery
The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of steroids versus watchful waiting improves pulmonary function tests in patients with history of COVID 19 infection who have residual hypoxemia and lung infiltrates. This is a non-inferiority trial which tests whether the outcomes after watchful waiting are not worst than after the use of steroids, with a margin of acceptable inferiority. The study team will limit inclusion to patients who have PCR- confirmed COVID19 at least in 10-weeks prior to enrollment, persistent opacities on chest imaging, and hypoxemia either at rest or during ambulation.
There are some criteria such as the most frequently used parameters to predict the failure of non-invasive mechanical ventilation, the APACHE 2 score, the presence of pneumonia and ARDS in the etiology, and no improvement in one hour of treatment. However, APECHE 2 score, which is the broadest of these criteria and includes others, is a complex scoring in which a large number of parameters are evaluated together, dependent on laboratory results and still leaves the final decision to the physician with a complete evaluation. In addition, the APACHE 2 score is a more commonly used method for intensive care patients rather than emergency patients who need a quick decision. Therefore, there is a need for a fast and practical method that can predict NIMV failure and determine early intubation decision in the management of patients admitted to the emergency department with acute dyspnea. Rapid Shallow Breathing Index (RSBI) is a parameter calculated by dividing the respiratory rate by the tidal volume and is used to predict whether patients who are intubated in intensive care unit can be extubated successfully. The aim of this study is to evaluate the success of RSBI in predicting intubation and mortality in patients presented to the emergency department with acute respiratory failure and had NIMV indication.
The oximeter is used to monitor intensive care patients undergoing oxygen therapy. It indicates pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2), a reflection of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) which enables detection of hypoxemia and hyperoxia, both deleterious state. Current SpO2 recommendations aim to reduce both risk of hypoxemia and hyperoxia. SpO2 is considered the 5th vital sign. Current recommendations for SpO2 targets do not consider the variability of oximeters used in clinical practice. This variability and lack of specification represent an obstacle to an optimal practice of oxygen therapy. Thus, this study aims to compare the SpO2 values of different oximeters (Nonin, Masimo, Philips, Nellcor) used in clinical practice with the SaO2 reference value obtained by an arterial gas in order to specify the precision and the systematic biases of the oximeters studied. This data will also make it possible to refine the recommendations concerning optimal oxygenation
The HEAVEN criteria were found valid to predict difficult airways during preclinical emergency intubations in a retrospective study. The acronym stands for Hypoxemia, Extremes of size, Anatomic abnormalities, Vomit/blood/fluid, Exsanguination/anaemia, and Neck mobility issues. This is a monocentric prospective observational study to assess the validity of the HEAVEN criteria in the in-hospital setting at a level I adult and pediatric emergency university-based hospital.
The aim of the study is to monitor and evaluate changes in body composition, with a special emphasis on muscle mass, in the context of polyneuromyopathy of critically-ill patients at ICU, on artificial ventilation (duration of artificial ventilation at least 7 days), and subsequent comparison with the patient's condition in 12 weeks, as a part of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) monitoring. The effect of the package (nutritional recommendations + physiotherapy protocol vs. standard of care) will be evaluated.