View clinical trials related to Respiratory Insufficiency.
Filter by:The goal of this interventional study is to compare standard mechanical ventilation to a lung-stress oriented ventilation strategy in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Participants will be ventilated according to one of two different strategies. The main question the study hopes to answer is whether the personalized ventilation strategy helps improve survival.
This study targets adult patients treated with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) at emergency department (ED) of Severance hospital, Yonsei university. Patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure presenting to the ED receive conventional oxygen therapy as initial treatment unless immediate endotracheal intubation is required. Partial rebreathing oxygen masks are mainly applied at first. If the patient's condition does not improve despite such treatment, the patient receives HFNC or endotracheal intubation. However, possible treatment range have not been studied, especially in ED. Decisions are made based on the personal experience of the medical staff in charge. Applying HFNC to patients who eventually fail can lead to delayed intubation and increased mortality. Failure prediction models such as ROX index and HACOR score have been developed due to such reasons. However, such models are mostly based on intensive care unit studies and after application of HFNC. Therefore, failure prediction model at the time before application of HFNC and efficacy of existing models in ED are necessary. This study is a prospective observational study and follows the standard treatment guidelines applied to the patient and the judgment of the attending physician during the patient's treatment process. Immediately before applying HFNC, the patient's respiratory rate, pulse rate, blood pressure, SpO₂, PaO₂, PaCO₂, GCS score are determined, and FiO₂ is measured above upper lips using oxygen analyzer(MaxO2+AE, Maxtec, USA). From these data, ROX index (SF ratio/respiratory rate), ROX-HR (ROX index/pulse rate), POX index (PF ratio/respiratory rate), POX-HR (POX index/pulse rate), and HACOR score (Heart Rate, Acidosis, Consciousness, Oxygenation, Respiratory rate) are calculated. The settings (flow rate, FiO₂, temperature) at the time of HFNC application are also measured. The same indices and HFNC settings are checked 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours after applying HFNC. Modified Borg score and comfort scale using 5-point Likert scale are additionally determined at 30 minutes for patient's comfort. Primary outcome is HFNC failure at 28 days, defined by endotracheal intubation. Other outcomes include intubation in ED and mortality at 28 and 90 days collected through phone interview. The receiver operating curve for ROX index, HACOR score, ROX-HR, and POX-HR at baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, and 12 hours are drawn for the outcomes. The area under the curve of the above indices are compared and cutoff values are chosen with maximum value of index J by the Youden's Index. A binary variable is created based on the cutoff values and multivariable logistic regression analyses are performed. Cutoff values for maximum specificity are also invested suggesting the lower limit of the indicator to which HFNC can be applied.
ARDS is an acutely induced respiratory failure characterized by the appearance of bilateral alveolar opacities on imaging and hypoxemia Etiologies are divided into two classes: pulmonary, including all infectious pathologies, aspiration pneumonia, and drowning, and extra-pulmonary, induced by sepsis or acute pancreatitis. The mortality rate of ARDS remains high in unselected patient populations Among strategies that have proven beneficial in terms of patient outcome, prone positioning (PP) is associated with the greatest impact in terms of reduction in mortality. PP is currently recommended in the European guidelines for ARDS associated with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 150 mmHg in patients in whom ventilatory settings have been optimized beforehand, The failure of early PP studies to demonstrate a survival benefit in ARDS was attributed to insufficient session duration. The PROSEVA study was the first to demonstrate that a PP duration of 17 h is associated with a reduction in mortality During the COVID-19 pandemic, several centers have reported the implementation of longer PP sessions. Two strategies have emerged from these studies. In one case, the patient was left in the prone position until the criteria for stopping PP were met. Thus, the PP/supine position alternation was completely suppressed. In another published strategy, PP sessions were maintained for a period covering two nights. Furthermore, in a multicenter retrospective study, PP sessions were maintained until clinical improvement was associated with reduced mortality. In this study of 263 patients, the median duration of PP in the extended duration group was 40 h, and 75% of the sessions lasted 48 h or less. Using a propensity score, the authors showed that patients treated with an extended PP duration had a lower 3-month mortality rate than patients in the standard duration group . This protocol was also associated with a 29% cumulative incidence of pressure sores, similar to the 25% cumulative incidence reported in the PROSEVA study Other data published on pressure sores and PP of duration > 24 hours are also reassuring. Finally, a recent review recently reported that an extended PP session of > 24 h had also been used before the COVID-19 pandemic. PP sessions had a median duration of 47-78 hours and were applied mainly to ARDS secondary to community-acquired pneumonia. All pre-COVID studies were retrospective, monocentric, without a control group.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of opioids administered during sedation on patients' respiratory activity (ventilation) and comfort of the operator and patient during the endoscopic procedure. A common side effect of sedation is the effect on patients' ventilation, resulting from a combination of attenuation of respiratory centre activity and loss of patent airways. Shallow sedation will reduce these risks, but in addition to patient discomfort, it also increases the difficulty or impossibility of the endoscopist to perform the procedure. Choosing the appropriate method of sedation thus fundamentally affects the course of the procedure from the point of view of both the patient and the endoscopist. The aim is to prove that sedation with propofol alone compared to sedation with propofol and fentanyl premedication leads to the need for higher cumulative doses of administered propofol, higher risk of respiratory depression and lower patient and operator comfort. In addition, the non-invasive respiratory volume monitor (ExSpiron 2Xi) will be used for standard patient monitoring during the procedure, which assesses the lung tidal volume and respiratory rate by measuring the electrical impedance of the chest. This measurement captures inadequate ventilation before saturation drops, allowing even slight differences between selected drugs to be compared.
The goal of this observational study is to establish an intelligent early warning system for acute and critical complications of the respiratory system such as pulmonary embolism and respiratory failure. Based on the electronic case database of the biomedical big data research center and the clinical real-world vital signs big data collected by wearable devices, the hybrid model architecture with multi-channel gated circulation unit neural network and deep neural network as the core is adopted, Mining the time series trends of multiple vital signs and their linkage change characteristics, integrating the structural nursing observation, laboratory examination and other multimodal clinical information to establish a prediction model, so as to improve patient safety, and lay the foundation for the later establishment of a higher-level and more comprehensive artificial intelligence clinical nursing decision support system. Issues addressed in this study 1. The big data of vital signs of patients collected in real-time by wearable devices were used to explore the internal relationship between the change trend of vital signs and postoperative complications (mainly including infection complications, respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest). Supplemented with necessary nursing observation, laboratory examination and other information, and use machine learning technology to build a prediction model of postoperative complications. 2. Develop the prediction model into software to provide auxiliary decision support for clinical medical staff, and lay the foundation for the later establishment of a higher-level and more comprehensive AI clinical decision support system.
Mechanical ventilation is a critical intervention in the management of pediatric patients with respiratory distress. During this process, accurate measurement of transpulmonary pressure (PL) is essential to ensure the safety and efficacy of ventilation. PL is defined as the difference between alveolar pressure (Palv) and pleural pressure (Ppl). While the direct measurement of Ppl is possible, it poses a risk to tissue integrity. Thus, the primary surrogate for Ppl measurement today is esophageal pressure (Pes). However, the measurement of Pes is not without challenges. This abstract outlines the pitfalls associated with Pes measurement, emphasizing the importance of employing well-defined procedures to mitigate potential errors. These errors can range from underestimation of Pes due to underfilled catheters to overestimation resulting from overfilled catheters. To address these challenges and optimize Pes measurement, various methods have been proposed for titrating the filling volume of the esophageal catheter. In this study, investigators aim to assess a faster decremental filling method and compare it to the traditionally accepted Mojoli method in the context of pediatric patients. This research seeks to enhance the intensivists' understanding of the most efficient and accurate approach to Pes measurement during mechanical ventilation in the pediatric population, ultimately contributing to improved patient care and outcomes
The goal of this study is to compare two different modes of noninvasive ventilation in hypercapnic respiratory failure. The investigators will compare AVAPS and BIPAP S/T and hypothesize that AVAPS will result in a decreased length of stay in the ICU or on telemetry. Currently, noninvasive ventilation is the standard of care for hypercapnic respiratory failure. However, the most effective mode for patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure is unclear.
Surface mechanomyography (sMMG) has been proposed as a tool to study muscle mechanical activity. sMMG is a noninvasive technique using specific transducers to record muscle surface oscillations due to mechanical activity of the motor units . It could be of major interest for the detection of respiratory efforts in patients with respiratory failure. This study aims at assessing the performances of sMMG to measure and detect respiratory drive and effort in healthy volunteers.
To identify biochemical, clinical, or genetic biomarkers that may predict responsiveness to iNO in neonates with PPHN/HRF. The primary outcome will be identification of any biomarker(s) associated with response to iNO therapy. We will evaluate related biomarkers at various time-points during disease progression and in response to therapy, including single nucleotide polymorphisms in the cyclic adenosine monophosphate/cyclic guanosine monophosphate-Phosphodiesterase (PDE) pathway, indicators of metabolic dysregulation and inflammation, as well as biochemical markers of heart strain. We will perform targeted neonatal echocardiograms to evaluate severity of PPHN and heart function both as an added clinical biomarker and to follow disease progression.
The purpose of this study is to investigate a specific approach to patient care called a time-limited trial (TLT). This approach is sometimes used for people who develop critical illness and are cared for in an intensive care unit (ICU). A time-limited trial is a plan made together by medical teams, patients with critical illness (if they can take part), and their families or other important people helping to make their healthcare decisions. A time-limited trial starts with a discussion of the patient's goals and wishes. Then, a plan is made to use ICU treatments for a set period of time to give the patient the chance to recover. After this time, the patient's response to treatment will be reviewed to help guide what to do next. Medical teams consider this kind of plan when it is not clear if a patient can recover to a quality of life that is acceptable to him or her. With a time-limited trial, patients, families, and medical teams experience this uncertainty together. The main goal of this study is to find the best way to use TLTs for patients in the ICU who have trouble breathing and need mechanical ventilation to help them breathe. The hypothesis is that optimal time-limited trial delivery will reduce the time patients with acute respiratory failure spend in the ICU and will improve the intensive care unit experiences for their families and clinicians.