Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

It is well known that regular resistance training (RT) can have health benefits. However, considerable heterogeneity in RT responses has been observed. The mechanisms underlying an individual's ability to respond to RT are mainly unknown but involve a complex network of genomic and non-genomic factors. The investigators aim to examine heterogeneity in physiological responses to RT while closely monitoring other environmental factors (e.g., physical activity levels, nutrition, sleep, and stress). Participants are healthy sedentary men and women aged 18-45 (n=240). A controlled 12-week RT intervention will be conducted to characterize RT response. Data will be collected before, during, and after the study period by using measurements of body composition, muscle size, and physical fitness characteristics, as well as by collecting blood samples and questionnaires. The investigators will identify the underlying factors contributing to why people differ in their physiological responses to RT. For this, comprehensive background data will be collected to identify common denominators underlying individual differences in response to RT. The investigators will use sophisticated analytical methods to reveal new predictors of training response for different traits. This research project aims to gain insight into the sources of individual variation in physiological responses to RT. On this basis, exercise training can be personalized to optimize the benefits of RT for all individuals. Ultimately, the investigators will also be able to justify better using RT as part of individualized healthcare strategies in the future.


Clinical Trial Description

The benefits of regular resistance training (RT) are well known, but it is also well known that tremendous inter-individual variability can be detected in responses to RT. The reason(s) for individual variations in responses to RT is a very complex physiological phenomenon and is still poorly known. The individual variation in trainability suggests genetic diversity but non-genetic determinants potentially contribute significantly to training responses. The investigators hypothesize that in this study, a broad spectrum of adaptive responses to RT is detected. By scrutinizing participants' backgrounds, it can be elucidated why individuals respond differently to regular RT. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that the investigators can identify specific predictive markers for RT responsiveness. That is possible by combining information on training responsiveness with the personal characteristics of the participant. Healthy young adults will be recruited to the study to understand the biological basis of heterogeneity in exercise responses by minimizing potential age and health-related physiological confounders. They are premised to respond positively to the study's primary outcome, which is maximal lower limb muscle strength. To collect comprehensive data, the number of participants is maximized within practical limitations, and thus, 240 participants are recruited. According to the investigators' extensive experience in fully supervised exercise training interventions with comprehensive and time-consuming physiological measures, this is the maximum number of participants that can examine within the timeframe allocated for data collection. Participants comprise an equal proportion of men and women, and sex differences in RT responsiveness will be investigated as a secondary aim of the study. The study design is a single-arm trial. After assessing eligibility, participants engage in the baseline measurements and the 12-week fully supervised RT intervention. The training protocol is identical for each participant. The participants will train two times weekly, and the program will target all major muscle groups. Each training session includes exercises for the lower (leg presses, knee extensions/flexions) and upper body (bench presses, biceps curls, and seated row). For the first two weeks, the participants will perform ~15 repetitions per set (approximately 50-70% of the one repetition maximum, 1RM) and three sets per exercise. After that, the training load will be at an 8- to 12-RM zone for four sets per exercise. The change in muscle strength (10RM test) is assessed in the gym at 2-week intervals. Loads are increased progressively for the next 2-week period if the prescribed number of repetitions is completed for a given load. A questionnaire on perceived exertion in each exercise session (sRPE) will be obtained to evaluate the participant's intrinsic effort in performing exercises. The training is executed in a local university gym with a standardized time of day, and training diaries are used to track the training loads. The measurements are obtained at baseline and after the intervention. Participants are informed of the study goals and are carefully familiarized with study protocols. All the tests are carried out at the same time of day. The participants are given feedback on their test results during the project. The primary outcome of this study is maximum leg press strength. Gains in muscle strength are determined by increased muscle size and/or improvements in capability to activate working muscles. In addition to genetics, environmental factors are essential in explaining individuality in training responses. In this project, the investigators focus on gathering comprehensive data on variables of participants' background, nutrition, health status, and physical activity that can potentially influence the heterogeneity of RT adaptations. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05874986
Study type Interventional
Source University of Jyvaskyla
Contact Juha P Ahtiainen, Assoc.Prof.
Phone +358408053740
Email juha.ahtiainen@jyu.fi
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date February 22, 2023
Completion date August 30, 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05987046 - Contrast Training, Post-activation Countermovement Jump Performance in High Strength Male N/A
Completed NCT04136821 - The Long-term Effects of Oceanix™ on Resistance Training Adaptations N/A
Recruiting NCT05945641 - Effect of Low-load Resistance Training vs. High-intensity Interval Training on Local Muscle Endurance N/A
Completed NCT04069351 - Body Composition Changes During Overfeeding Plus Resistance Training N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06360536 - Remotely Delivered Resistance Training for Cardiometabolic Health Among Black Women N/A
Completed NCT04535596 - Blood Flow Restriction Exercises and Conservative Exercises in Knee Osteoarthritis N/A
Completed NCT04213586 - Effects of Whey Protein and Collagen Supplementation N/A
Completed NCT05052164 - Improvement Of Physical And Physiological Parameters In Menopausal Or Post-Menopausal Celiac Women N/A
Completed NCT04630951 - Blood Flow Restriction Strength Training in Professional Soccer Players N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03722277 - Variable Resistance Training in Patients With Osteoarthrosis of the Knee N/A
Completed NCT00991523 - Overnight Post-Exercise Recovery After Protein Ingestion Prior to Sleep N/A
Completed NCT01216722 - Study of Resistance Strengthening Versus Ambulation Post-Liver Transplant N/A
Recruiting NCT06240962 - Mindfulness Practice vs Strength Training on Pain, Kinesiophobia and Function Among Sprinters N/A
Recruiting NCT06131125 - Plyometric vs Explosive Strength Training on Agility, Power, and Balance in Basketball Players N/A
Recruiting NCT06131047 - High Intensity Resistance Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction in ACL Reconstruction N/A
Recruiting NCT06131138 - Aquatic Exercises VS Core Strengthening on Disability, Flexibility and Postural Stability in Weightlifters. N/A
Completed NCT04315077 - The Short Term Effects of Oceanix Supplementation on Recovery N/A
Completed NCT05597423 - Massage as Recovery Strategy After Resistance Training N/A
Completed NCT02327975 - Prescription of Physical Exercise Through Mobile Application in Elderly N/A
Recruiting NCT06171841 - Effects of Low-Intensity Blood Flow Restriction Training in Normoxia and Hypoxia Conditions N/A