View clinical trials related to Researcher-Subject Relations.
Filter by:The ever-increasing population and life expectancy worldwide lead to a higher prevalence of physical disabilities and diseases, which increases the need for physical medicine and rehabilitation research. In our study, we aimed to evaluate various aspects of the barriers, particularly gender disparities, faced by physical medicine and rehabilitation professionals who wish to conduct scientific research.
Despite significant racial disparities in health outcomes, racial minority groups in the United States are not adequately represented in clinical trials, and clinical trial results published in major medical journals often underreport racial demographic data of participants. Lack of diversity in clinical trials threatens the generalizability of study results and reduces the ability of minority groups to benefit from medical advancement and innovation. Prior studies show that Black men are more likely to engage in preventive services when there is racial concordance with their healthcare provider. There is minimal literature about how racial concordance or diversity in clinical trial leadership impacts study enrollment. This project examines whether patients' willingness to participate in randomized clinical trials differs based on the characteristics of the investigator.
The Effect of Individualized Nutrition Training Given to the Families of Children with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) in the Post-Operative Period on their Growth and Development This study was conducted experimentally to determine the effects of individualized nutrition training given to mothers of children who had surgery for CHD on their growth and development.
The goal of this project is to develop and evaluate a novel, electronic informed consent application for research involving electronic health record (EHR) data. In response to NIH RFA-OD-15-002, this study addresses research using clinical records and data, including the issues of the appropriate content and duration of informed consent and patient preferences about research use of clinical information. This study will design an electronic consent application intended to improve patients' satisfaction with and understanding of consent for research using their EHR data. The electronic application will provide interactive functionality that creates a virtual, patient-centered discussion with patients about research that uses EHR data. Also, to correct potential misconceptions and increase informedness, the application will present trust-enhancing messages that highlight facts about research regulations, researcher training, and data protections. This study (Specific Aim 2 of the linked study protocol) will compare the effectiveness of the interactive, trust-enhanced consent application to an interactive consent and standard consent (no interactivity, no trust- enhancement) using a randomized trial of the three consents with 750 adults in a network of family medicine practices. Primary outcomes will be satisfaction with the consent decision and understanding of the consent content. This application will allow patients to learn more about clinical research and make informed choices about whether or not they want their health records and data to be used for research. This first phase of this project (IRB#:201500678) was innovative because it created a virtual, patient-centered discussion about research using EHR data. Moreover, this project produced a consent application that clinicians and researchers will use in this phase (Phase two) of the trial as an ethically sound and practical tool for consenting patients, in a clinical setting, for research involving EHRs. Overall, this study will improve understanding of how to best give patients information about research that uses their health records and data. With this understanding, this study will develop a new computer application that patients can use in their doctors' offices. This application will allow patients to learn more about clinical research and make informed choices about whether or not they want their health records and data to be used for research.
Primary Objective: To investigate the pretreatment quantitative factors as shown in SD-OCT images that correlate with posttreatment VA in patients who underwent intravitreal Lucentis (Ranibizumab) for RVO. Secondary Objectives: Correlations between posttreatment BCVA and pretreatment factors were evaluated, including age, pretreatment BCVA, photoreceptor outer segment (PROS) length, central foveal thickness (CFT), outer foveal thickness (OFT), and outer nuclear layer thickness (ONLT). The factors influencing posttreatment BCVA were evaluated using multiple regression analysis. Detailed information on macular morphology, such as the photoreceptor IS/OS junction and ELM, can be obtained in SD-OCT. Some OCT studies evaluated other quantitative factors in eye disease. It was reported that PROS length was correlated with BCVA in patients with DME.¹ Other investigators suggested that the thickness, area, and volume of the outer layer were correlated with BCVA in patients with dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD).² Outer foveal thickness (OFT) and relative reflectivity of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) were associated with BCVA in patients with macular hole.3, 4 The volume of the ONL was found to be associated with BCVA in patients with AMD.5 The aim of this study was to investigate the pretreatment quantitative factors as shown in SD-OCT images that correlate with posttreatment VA in patients who underwent intravitreal Lucentis (Ranibizumab) for RVO.