Renal Vein Thrombosis Clinical Trial
— CONDOROfficial title:
The Role of an Implantable Doppler Vascular Monitoring Device in Kidney Transplant Patients: a Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial With an Embedded Qualitative Study.
NCT number | NCT05634863 |
Other study ID # | 21/SUR/626 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | April 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date | July 1, 2023 |
Verified date | November 2023 |
Source | University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
INTRODUCTION Vascular complications in kidney transplantation constitute one-third of the early graft loss (EGL) that can be prevented by timely diagnosed cases. A vascular monitoring device may have a possible role in the early identification of graft hypoperfusion critical to reducing graft loss. AIM To evaluate the feasibility of an Implantable Doppler probe as a vascular monitoring device in kidney transplant patients and by obtaining the vital information, inform the protocol development of a definitive RCT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A mixed-method research design is selected. The quantitative study will comprise a feasibility RCT (fRCT) that will compare demographical characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients that will undergo kidney transplant surgery with vascular monitoring device (intervention group, n=25) against those with standard care clinical observation (control group, n=25). Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise the results that will assess the vascular monitoring capability of implantable Doppler probe in the early postoperative period of kidney transplant patients. The results will provide estimates for surgical outcomes essential to inform the sample size calculation for the definitive study. Information related to the fluency of research methods, availability of research resources, management support, potential challenges faced during the fRCT will be compiled to generate realistic estimates of important parameters for the definitive study. The results will be following the CONSORT updated guidelines for reporting feasibility studies. Qualitative semi-structured interviews of stakeholders (n=12) recruited by purposive sampling will be conducted to explore their experiences of participating in the study, acquire suggestions regarding application of implantable Doppler probe monitoring, and the post implantation patient care. All interviews will be audio-recorded with verbatim transcription. Data will be analysed following the six-phase guide to doing thematic analysis in the NVivo software. The results will be reported in accordance with the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist. IMPACT It is anticipated that this study will also elaborate on a possible role of implantable Doppler probe monitoring to improve kidney transplant patient safety, graft survival, service quality improvement, and financial savings in the NHS.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | July 1, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | July 1, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who will have deceased or living kidney donor transplants 2. Patients aged 18 years or above. 3. Patients able and willing to comply with the trial requirements Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who will have a kidney transplant with more than two arteries (evident at the time of surgery). 2. Patients below 18 years of age. 3. Patients lacking capacity or unwilling to give consent. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United Kingdom | University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust | Plymouth | Devon |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust |
United Kingdom,
Chang TY, Lee YC, Lin YC, Wong ST, Hsueh YY, Kuo YL, Shieh SJ, Lee JW. Implantable Doppler Probes for Postoperatively Monitoring Free Flaps: Efficacy. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Nov 28;4(11):e1099. doi: 10.1 — View Citation
Crane J, Hakim N. The use of an implantable Doppler flow probe in kidney transplantation: first report in the literature. Exp Clin Transplant. 2011 Apr;9(2):118-20. — View Citation
de Jong KP, Bekker J, van Laarhoven S, Ploem S, van Rheenen PF, Albers MJ, van der Hilst CS, Groen H. Implantable continuous Doppler monitoring device for detection of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2012 Nov 15;94( — View Citation
Hakim DN, Nader MA, Sood A, Kandilis A, Hakim NS. Rescue of Transplanted Kidney Thanks to an Implantable Doppler Probe: Is This the Future? Exp Clin Transplant. 2016 Aug;14(4):454-5. doi: 10.6002/ect.2014.0135. Epub 2014 Oct 21. — View Citation
Lenz Y, Gross R, Penna V, Bannasch H, Stark GB, Eisenhardt SU. Evaluation of the Implantable Doppler Probe for Free Flap Monitoring in Lower Limb Reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Mar;34(3):218-226. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608628. Epub 2017 Nov 27. — View Citation
Poder TG, Fortier PH. Implantable Doppler in monitoring free flaps: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on a systematic review of the literature. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2013 Apr;130(2):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 No — View Citation
Schmulder A, Gur E, Zaretski A. Eight-year experience of the Cook-Swartz Doppler in free-flap operations: microsurgical and reexploration results with regard to a wide spectrum of surgeries. Microsurgery. 2011 Jan;31(1):1-6. doi: 10.1002/micr.20816. — View Citation
Vasant Kulkarni S, Rao PP, Naidu CS, Pathak N, Singh AK. Evaluation of implantable Doppler probe continuous monitoring of hepatic artery anastomosis after liver transplantation. Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Jul;77(3):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.0 — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | OBJECTIVE 1: To assess the capability of vascular monitoring device in the early postoperative care of kidney transplant patients This objective will be achieved in the feasibility randomised controlled trial. | OUTCOME MEASURES FOR OBJECTIVE 1:
The following outcomes in both the intervention and control groups will be recorded and compared to measure the objective 1. The number of early vascular complications identified in each group (measured as numerical number i.e.,1,2,3 etc). The number of departmental ultrasound scans requested in the first 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively in each participant (measured as numerical number i.e.,1,2,3 etc). The number of grafts lost due to vascular complications in each group (measured as numerical number i.e.,1,2,3 etc). |
12 weeks | |
Primary | OBJECTIVE 2: To assess the research methods used in this feasibility randomised for the definitive planned randomised controlled study This objective will be achieved in the feasibility randomised controlled trial. | OUTCOME MEASURES FOR OBJECTIVE 2:
The suitability of the following research processes used in the study will be estimated. Any difficulties or shortcomings encountered will be highlighted. Difficulties encountered with eligibility criteria and recruitment process (measured as a binary variable i.e., Yes or No). Difficulties encountered with randomisation or allocation concealment (measured as a binary variable i.e., Yes or No). Difficulties encountered with retention/follow-up/compliance of participants (measured as a binary variable i.e., Yes or No). Variation or fidelity encountered in the delivery of the intervention marked against a fidelity checklist (measured as a binary variable i.e., Yes or No) |
12 weeks | |
Primary | OBJECTIVE 3: To assess the availability of research resources, management support, potential barriers and challenges for the definitive planned future RCT. This objective will be achieved in the feasibility randomised controlled trial. | OUTCOME MEASURES FOR OBJECTIVE 3:
The availability of the following research resources in this study will be recorded. Any shortcomings or non-availability of resources encountered will be highlighted. Availability of participant documentation (i.e., participant information sheet, consent form, data collection sheet) (measured as a binary variable i.e., Yes or No). Availability of medical equipment and healthcare staff in the host centre required to handle the number of participants and the research procedures (measured as a binary variable i.e., Yes or No). Availability of technological capacity for communication and adequate software to randomise, record, process, and store research data (measured as a binary variable i.e., Yes or No). Availability of management support for the research project and back up plans for any extenuating circumstances (measured as a binary variable i.e., Yes or No). |
12 weeks | |
Primary | Objective 4: To assess the acceptability of the ID probe blood flow monitoring device in clinical practice and get suggestions for the definitive planned future RCT. This objective will be achieved by the embedded qualitative study | OUTCOME MEASURES FOR OBJECTIVE 4:
The acceptability of the intervention in clinical practice will be assessed by conducting the thematic analysis of the views and experiences of stake holders (clinicians, transplant surgeons, nurses, and kidney transplant patients with the experience of receiving/delivering the intervention and participating in the study) obtained by qualitative interviews with open ended questions. Furthermore, suggestions to improve the design of the definitive planned future RCT, functioning of the ID probe blood flow monitoring device, or any aspect of postoperative patient care will also be acquired. |
12 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03778502 -
DOAC in Unusual Site Venous Thrombosis
|
||
Completed |
NCT02585713 -
Apixaban or Dalteparin in Reducing Blood Clots in Patients With Cancer Related Venous Thromboembolism
|
Phase 3 |