View clinical trials related to Renal Stone.
Filter by:The use of flexible ureteroscopy and minimally-invasive percutaneous techniques, which utilize smaller tract sizes, has been established as a way to decrease the invasiveness of procedures and improve patient outcomes compared to conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and flexible mini-PCNL has emerged as a novel technique previously first as an auxiliary procedure and then as a standalone technique. This study aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of flexible nephoscopy in improving stone clearance compared to standard retrograde intrarenal surgery using a flexible ureteroscope.
This study will be conducted to compare early (one week) versus delayed (2-4 weeks) definitive ureteroscopic lithotripsy after initial drainage for obstructing ureteral or renal stones associated with infection.
Primary aim: comparing the efficacy of standard PCNL and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the Galdakao-modified Supine Valdivia (GMSV) position in a single session for the treatment of complex nephrolithiasis in obese patients. Secondary aim: comparing safety and complications of standard PCNL and ECIRS in the GMSV.
The ureteral access sheath (UAS) is an ancillary device widely used by urologists to facilitate fast, repeatable, and safe access to ureters and collecting systems; improve visibility; reduce the risk of infection by reducing intrarenal pressure; and protect ureters and scopes when extracting multiple stones during surgery. Insertion of ureteric access sheath may be difficult due to tight ureter, so sometimes preoperative stenting might be needed. Silodosin is an α1A adrenoceptor with high affinity and selectivity for the ureteric muscle, which may reduce ureteral spasm. Oral a1-blockers can reduce intraureteral pressure, and may reduce maximal ureteral access sheath insertion force.¹ Preoperative silodosin protects against significant ureteral injury related to UAS insertion during fURS and decreases postoperative pain level. Silodosin premedication might be an effective and safe technique to replace prestenting.²
The primary aim of the study is to compare the operative times following ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones with Thulium Fiber Laser using low and high power settings. Secondary aims are to compare the results of low and high power settings in terms of stone free rates, laser time, laser activation patterns, intraoperative and postoperative complications. Patients ≥ 18 years with renal stones (8-25 mm) scheduled for ureteroscopic lithotripsy at the Day Surgery Clinic at Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, are eligible for inclusion in the study. After written consent and inclusion, patients are randomised to laser lithotripsy using either low power settings (Group 1: 4-6 Watt, short pulse mode) or high power settings (Group 2: 16-18 Watt, short pulse mode). The ureteroscopic procedures are performed in general anaesthesia using a standardised technique. All patients are followed up with a low dose CT scan 3 months post endoscopically to assess stone free status as well as a consultation at the outpatient clinic. Results and data for the two randomisation groups are compared according to the aims of the study.
- Reporting prevalence of uric acid based renal stones among patients with nephrolithiasis admitted to Mansoura Urology and Nephrology center (MUNC). - Furthermore, identification of monogenic and polygenic uric acid stone formers. - Identification of factors associated uric acid stone recurrence as well as determinants of laterality in patients with uric acid based renal stones
In the available literature, there is a lack the risk categorization of infectious complications after RIRS with subsequent recommendation as regard to AP in different risk patients. Therefore this study is planning to investigate the optimal protocol for AP prior to RIRS in high-risk population through comparing the enhanced regimen (2days) vs. the extended regimen (7 days) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
This multi-center trial is being completed to compare patient outcomes related to the Imajin silicone stent in comparison to non-silicone polyurethane stents after ureteroscopy. Eligible participants will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive the Imajin silicone stent or a non-silicone stent. In addition, the participants will complete questionnaires and have follow-up information collected (approximately 60 days after surgery). The trial hypothesizes that a ureteral stent made of silicone, will have superior outcomes when compared to non-silicone stents.
The optimal management of medium-sized renal stones remains quite challenging and continues to be contested. In the present study, the investigators will compare mini-PNL, RIRS and SWL in the treatment of non- lower pole, medium size, high dense renal stones regarding the stone-free rate, the safety of the procedures, cost, and patients' and surgeon's satisfaction. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated into three equal groups (mini-PNL, RIRS, and SWL). Postoperative, patients will be followed-up by regularly for 3 months. The study parameters will be compared between groups.
This study aims to compare the narrow focus (F1) versus the wide focus (F3) in terms of the efficacy of Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) in the management of renal calculi 1-2 cm and their injurious effect on the kidney.