Comparison of Best Medical Treatment Versus Best Medical Treatment Plus Renal Artery Stenting

Renal Artery Stenosis Clinical Trial

— RADAR  

Official title:

A Randomized, Multi-centre, Prospective Study Comparing Best Medical Treatment Versus Best Medical Treatment Plus Renal Artery Stenting in Patients With Hemodynamically Relevant Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00640406
• Other study ID #: C0701
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: March 17, 2008
• Last updated: July 20, 2015
• Start date: April 2008
• Est. completion date: March 2015

Study information

• Verified date: July 2015
• Source: Biotronik AG
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The clinical investigation is a prospective, international, multi-centre, randomized (1:1) trial with follow ups at 2, 6, 12 months and 3 years.

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the clinical impact of percutaneous transluminal renal artery stenting (PTRAS) on the impaired renal function measured by the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) in patients with hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 86
• Est. completion date: March 2015
• Est. primary completion date: December 2011
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age = 18 years

• Informed consent signed by patient (and/or legal guardian),

• Hemodynamically relevant de novo unilateral or bilateral atherosclerotic renal artery diameter stenosis RAS (= 70%)

• Estimated GFR > 10 ml/min calculated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation,

• Patients presenting mild, moderate or severe hypertension (defined according to the WHO guidelines) and/or renal dysfunction,

• Target lesion must be completely coverable by one study stent,

• Total target lesion length estimated to be less than 19 mm,

• Target lesion accessible to direct stenting or, after pre-dilation, is likely to sufficiently benefit from stenting (at the discretion of the investigator),

• Renal reference vessel diameter (RVD) of = 4.0 mm and < 7.0 mm based on visual estimation,

• Willingness to comply with all the specified follow-up evaluations.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Estimated GFR = 10 ml/min,

• Renal atrophy or kidney length < 7cm (referring to kidney with target lesion),

• Patient not eligible for PTRAS,

• Patient not eligible for stenting,

• Target lesion occlusion,

• Target lesion and/or target vessel proximal to the target lesion is severely calcified,

• Treatment of branch lesion required,

• Fresh thrombus or embolic lesion

• Need for embolic protection in previous or planned PTRAS,

• Clotting disorders,

• INR > 2.5 before the intervention,

• Patient presents fibromuscular dysplasia,

• Prior revascularization of target lesion,

• History of target vessel revascularization within the last six months,

• Angiographic restenosis of any segment of the target vessel that has undergone prior percutaneous intervention,

• Any thrombolytic therapy procedure within 72 hours prior to planned study procedure

• Active peptic ulcer or gastro intestinal bleeding,

• Active inflammation of the kidney interfering with diagnosis and treatment of RAS (e.g. glomerulonephritis, aortitis, vasculitis),

• Radiation damage of the kidney,

• Renal disease associated with aortic aneurysm i.e. diameter of the aorta > 40 mm,

• Chronic renal replacement therapy,

• Life expectancy < 1 year,

• Co-morbid conditions limiting participation and follow-up

• Patient currently participating in another trial possibly influencing the safety of the patient and/or the outcomes of the study,

• Pregnancy/Planned pregnancy/Childbearing potential without sufficient measures to prevent pregnancy as judged by the investigator,

• Known allergy to contrast medium that cannot be adequately controlled with pre-medication,

• Known intolerance against acetylic-salicylic acid (ASA), heparin, clopidogrel and ticlopidin, cobalt-chromium,

• Metformin intake not stopped at least 48 hours before the intervention

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Renal Artery Obstruction
• Renal Artery Stenosis

Intervention

Device:
• Dynamic Renal Stent plus Best Medical Treatment
percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the kidney artery at index procedure followed by best medical treatment for hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis according to local standards

Drug:
• Best Medical Treatment
best medical treatment for hypertension secondary to renal artery stenosis according to local standards

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Germany	Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen	Bad Krozingen	Baden-Württemberg

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Biotronik AG

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Difference between treatments in change of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)		12 months	No