Removable Partial Denture Clinical Trial
Official title:
PEEK Versus Metallic Framework for Extra Coronal Attachment Mandibular Bilateral Distally Extension Removable Partial Denture- Evaluation of Abutments Bone Height Changes and Patient Satisfaction. A Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT number | NCT04990453 |
Other study ID # | KD/12/21 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | February 2, 2020 |
Est. completion date | May 15, 2021 |
Verified date | August 2021 |
Source | Kafrelsheikh University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Purpose: The present study was aimed to evaluate the bone height changes around abutments with two different framework materials for extracoronal attachment mandibular bilateral distally extension removable partial denture (RPD) and compare patient satisfaction associated with its use. Materials and methods: Ten partially edentulous patients (long span kennedy class I) were selected, for all patients splinting of remaining abutment were done by porcelain fused to metal bridges, after cementation the RPD frameworks were digitally designed by CAD software and printed into 3-D resin pattern after intra-oral try in of these patterns, the patients were divided into two equalized groups, the patients in first group received extracoronal attachment (RPD)with from milled PEEK (Juvora) framework. While patients in second group received extracoronal attachment (RPD) with conventional metal framework by lost wax technique. Digital radiography was used for bone height assessment of distal abutment at time of prosthesis insertion, 6 and 12 months later. Patient satisfaction was measured using VAS scale.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 28 |
Est. completion date | May 15, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | April 15, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 55 Years to 60 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - The average age of selected patients was from 55 -60 years . - Completely edentulous maxillary arch opposed by partially edentulous mandible with only remaining mandibular anterior teeth. - All selected patients were free from any systemic diseases, - All patients had Angle class I maxillomandibular skeletal relation, - The distal extension ridge was well formed and covered by healthful, firm mucosa, - Suitable abutments with healthy periodontal ligament and appropriate crown/root ratio (CRR) as verified by periapical radiograph. The exclusion criteria to the patients were: - patients with any systemic disease that could affect the rate of bone resorption which confirmed by obtaining a medical history, - Patients with Para-functional habits (Bruxism and clenching), - Patients with any septic foci or impacted teeth as proved by panoramic radiograph, - Patients with tilted or rotated abutments. Patients with soft tissue undercuts had involved in the design. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Egypt | Faculty of Oral & Dental Medicine,Kafr El-shiekh University, Kafr El-shiekh ,Egypt | Kafr El-shiekh |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Kafrelsheikh University |
Egypt,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | evaluation of bone height changes | An image plate was attached on a radiographic stent specially constructed for each patient to made a standardized periapical radiograph for the abutments by using the Dentsply/rinn XCP tools (long, round BID cone paralleling technique) according to:
Image analysis: The linear measurement system contributed by the special software of the Vista-scan machine was used for measuring the mesial and distal marginal bone height around the canine abutments bilaterally in both groups. |
12 months | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction (VAS) | Patient satisfaction was assessed using a questionnaire based on visual analog scale (VAS). Satisfaction after six months follow up period was tested concerning comfort, esthetics, stability, speaking retention, general satisfaction. Patients were requested to mark their answer (amount of satisfaction) on a 100-mm line (with zero indicates to not satisfied at all and 100 indicates to completely satisfied). Higher VAS scores showed high satisfaction and lower scores indicated low satisfaction. The mean of the answers (length of the lines from zero to the marks in mm) for every question was subjected to statistical analysis.
All dimensions of this instrument are highly associated with the items of general satisfaction |
12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT03522272 -
Effectiveness of an Ultrasonic Denture Hygiene Intervention Program Among Community-dwelling Elders
|
Phase 4 |