Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06410183 |
Other study ID # |
2022-2161 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 1, 2019 |
Est. completion date |
August 1, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2024 |
Source |
Rijnstate Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The goal of this study is to investigate the inter-rater variability of mortality risk
calculations for high-risk non-cardiac surgical patients. For this purpose patient
information from health care files were used. Five anesthesiologists calculated the mortality
risks with three calculators for 34 high-risk non-cardiac surgical patients. The patients
were discussed in a preoperative multidisciplinary discussion in a large teaching hospital in
The Netherlands.
Description:
Identifying high-risk patients for perioperative treatment and decision-making remains a
challenge due to difficulty in reliably estimating morbidity and mortality risks. Assessing
surgical risk helps allocating resources, obtaining informed consent, and making shared
decisions with a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Multimorbidity is increasing globally in an
ageing population with a growing burden of chronic diseases. It has been shown that high-risk
non-cardiac surgical patients suffer disproportionally from perioperative complications.
Preoperative mortality risk calculators are available and may help to identify high-risk
non-cardiac surgical patients already before surgery, triggering efforts to lower the burden
of possible complications, e.g., by extended monitoring or specified treatments. A systematic
review suggested a significant risk of bias in developing current preoperative risk
calculators due to lack of external validation, highlighting the need for enhanced
performance and reliability to ensure their effectiveness in clinical practice. Low
reliability and performance may, despite their general availability, be why that preoperative
risk calculators are not yet consistently used in clinical practice. For daily clinical use,
good predictive performance, low inter rater variability and user friendliness are essential.
Discrepancies in predictor measurements can cause miscalibration, changes in discriminatory
ability, and overall accuracy, leading to clinically relevant variability in risk calculator
results. Previous studies have shown that physicians must trust a mortality risk calculator
before utilization. High-risk patients suffer especially from complications, and it has been
shown that the complications often result in death perioperatively. Therefore, adequate
preoperative calculation of mortality risks and early recognition of high-risk non-cardiac
surgical patients could benefit from reliable preoperative risk calculation. These high-risk
patients can then be discussed in a preoperative multidisciplinary discussion to lower
complications and perioperative deaths.
The current study evaluated the inter-rater reliability of calculating preoperative mortality
risk scores for high-risk non-cardiac surgical patients in clinical practice among five
anesthesiologists. The hypothesis was that the available risk calculators would show moderate
to good reliability. For this purpose, five anesthesiologists used the following three risk
calculators: the preoperative score to predict postoperative morbidity [POSPOM, the American
College of Surgeons surgical risk calculator, and the surgical outcome risk tool [SORT].