Relapse Clinical Trial
Official title:
CAD/CAM Fixed Retainers vs. Conventional Multistranded Fixed Retainers in Orthodontic Patients. Comparison of Stability, Retainer Failure Rate, Adverse Effects, Cost-effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Introduction: Orthodontic retainers are used after the completion of orthodontic treatment to assure dental occlusal stability and to maintain the achieved end-result. However, without retention teeth could go back to their initial dental malposition or could even take a different unpredicted position resulting once again in dental malocclusion (a deviation from normal occlusion). There are different types of retainers, some are fixed (glued to the back of the front teeth), and others are removable (can be removed and replaced into the mouth by the patient). While there are various retainers used for retention (stability), there is no perfect method. Fixed retainers (FRs) are used worldwide. On the one hand, FRs focus on preventing relapse. On the other hand, there are sometimes some adverse effects of retainers; they could fail at a certain point (break/get loose), or cause unwanted tooth movements. Until now, the choice of a retention method is based solely on clinicians' experience as there is no substantial evidence regarding the best retention method or the duration of the retention period. Some clinicians prolong the retention period while others prefer to keep the retainers for an indefinite time. As the world is advancing, so is the orthodontic science. New FR fabricated by CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing), are assumed to have greater accuracy, better fit, and most importantly, might offer a passive positioning of the retainer. However, the evidence about CAD/CAM FRs is very limited. Purpose: To investigate and compare the clinical effectiveness of two types of FRs; CAD/CAM vs. multistranded wire, in terms of stability (primary outcome), failure rate, adverse effects, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction (secondary outcomes), substantial up to 5 years after retainer placement. Hypotheses: Compared to traditional multistranded FRs, CAD/CAM FRs have: - Better long term stability, - Similar failure rate, - Fewer adverse effects, - Similar cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction.
Material and Methods Setting: Section of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Denmark and Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Norway. Sample size: 126 participants are needed for this study. Randomization: After oral and written consent is obtained, allocation to groups, either conventional multistranded Stainless Steel fixed retainers, or CAD/CAM custom-cut Nickel Titanium fixed retainers, will take place at the last appointment before debonding. Subjects will be allocated 1:1 into one of the two groups. Intervention protocol: After completing a full active orthodontic treatment, at both centers. The achieved treatment end result has to be maintained in the long term in order to prevent relapse (movement of teeth to the initial malocclusion). One of either two different fixed retainers will be bonded (to the upper and lower anterior teeth) by one operator in each center. This study follows a standard retention protocol procedure carried at both centers and has a long term posttreatment follow-up of 5 years. Patients will be recalled for follow-up appointments after 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months. At follow-up visits, we will perform the following: at 1, and 3 months - a clinical examination. At 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months - a clinical examination, a digital impression of the teeth known as "an intraoral scan" (Trios 3, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) and intraoral photographs. In addition, at 1, 6, and 12 months patients will be asked to fill out a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) form regarding patient satisfaction Furthermore, we will investigate stability by superimposition (Orthoanalyzer, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) together with recording of adverse effects (i.e. any changes in torque and/or rotations of the teeth). ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04380220 -
Coagulation/Complement Activation and Cerebral Hypoperfusion in Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis
|
||
Completed |
NCT00306813 -
Evaluation of Lenalidomide, Doxorubicin and Dexamethasone (RAD) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01956695 -
Efficacy of Lenalidomide With Rituximab in Refractory or Relapse of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05926167 -
Observational Trial Evaluating Elevated Factor VIII Related Labs as a Biomarker for Incomplete Relapse Recovery
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03710512 -
Evaluation of Early Relapse After Mandibular Lengthening Surgery
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04921540 -
Ingrown Toenails : Surgery Only Versus Surgery + Chemical Cauterization With TCA
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05250765 -
Comparison of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Two Types of Bonded Orthodontic Retainers: an RCT.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03830827 -
MBRP + Vortioxetine VS MBRP on Preventing Relapse in Chronic MA Users
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05915273 -
Relapse and Failure Rates Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Fixed Retainers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06417346 -
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06417359 -
Comparison of Mesh Fixation and Non-Fixation in eTEP
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02145403 -
Phase 1/2 Study of Carfilzomib for the Prevention of Relapse and GVHD in Allo-HCT for Hematologic Malignancies
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01481701 -
A Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Oxaliplatin With 5-Fluorouracil in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01941394 -
Mesenchymal Stem Cells Infusion for aGVHD Prophylaxis Transplantation
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04723901 -
Dual Target CAR-T Cells in B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04994626 -
Ibrutinib Combined With Rituximab for Treatment of Relapsed Refractory MYD88 and CD79A/B (or CD79B Alone) DLBCL Who Have Received at Least Two Prior Therapies
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06292364 -
Comparison of Retention Characteristics of Immediate vs Delayed Retainer Delivery Using 3D Digital Model Analysis
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05591703 -
Clinical Outcomes Following Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation to Improve Relapse Prevention: A Long-term Follow-up Study
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00299923 -
Study for Patients With Chronic HCV (GT 1 or 3) Who Relapsed to Previous (Peg)Interferon/ Ribavirin Combination Therapy
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04162041 -
Topotecan Plus M6620 (VX-970) vs. Topotecan Alone in People With Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer
|
Phase 2 |