Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05706233
Other study ID # 2021.11.254
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date February 15, 2022
Est. completion date May 15, 2022

Study information

Verified date June 2023
Source Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, one of the most commonly performed abdominal surgeries, is a gold standard therapy for surgical treatment of benign biliary diseases. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) was first presented in 2016 as the treatment of neuropathic pain in a case series, and gained popularity very quickly due to its safety applicability, and effect on both the visceral and parietal component of pain by providing paravertebral, transforaminal and epidural spread. Preoperative application of ESPB has taken its place as a part of multimodal analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases over time and has been shown to reduce postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption and to improve quality of recovery scores. However, there is no data regarding the use of ESPB in the postoperative period as a rescue therapy.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 108
Est. completion date May 15, 2022
Est. primary completion date May 15, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Patients with NRS>3 scores in the PACU Exclusion Criteria: - ASA > 2 - Violation of standart protocol (anesthesia and analgesia) - application of ESPB preoperatively - age > 65 - Surgery duration >90min or <45min

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Erector Spina Plane Group
ESPB had been applied postoperatively: from T8 level, 20mL bupivacaine %0,5 + 5ml %2 lidocaine was applied.
IV analgesic intervention
IV analgesics had been applied: All meperidine boluses are dosed in line with the pain intensity as follows: 10 mg if NRS > 3, 20 mg if NRS > 5, 30 mg if NRS > 8. If NRS score is not reduced at least 20% when compared to prior one, additional meperidine bolus is applied.

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Istanbul Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital Istanbul

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary effect of ESPB applied postoperatively on the meperidine consumption in PACU As part of the standardized perioperative care management, the pain intensity is evaluated with the numeric pain rating scale (NRS). If the NRS is > 3 meperidine bolus or ESPB is applied in line with the patients' selection and the patients are evaluated in every 5 min in terms of their NRS scores until NRS < 4 is achieved. If NRS score is not reduced at least 20% when compared to prior one, additional meperidine bolus is applied. All meperidine boluses are dosed in line with the pain intensity as follows: 10 mg if NRS > 3, 20 mg if NRS > 5, 30 mg if NRS > 8. NRS scores and meperidine boluses applied are recorded on the PACU follow-up form. 1 HOUR
Secondary effect of ESPB applied postoperatively on numeric rating scores in PACU As part of the standardized perioperative care management, the pain intensity is evaluated with the numeric pain rating scale (NRS). If the NRS is > 3 meperidine bolus or ESPB is applied in line with the patients' selection and the patients are evaluated in every 5 min in terms of their NRS scores until NRS < 4 is achieved. If NRS score is not reduced at least 20% when compared to prior one, additional meperidine bolus is applied. All meperidine boluses are dosed in line with the pain intensity as follows: 10 mg if NRS > 3, 20 mg if NRS > 5, 30 mg if NRS > 8. NRS scores and meperidine boluses applied are recorded on the PACU follow-up form. 1 HOUR
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06005480 - Understanding Rebound Pain After Regional Anesthesia Resolution in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Completed NCT04565093 - Efficacy of iPACK After Unilateral TKA N/A
Recruiting NCT06074471 - Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block N/A
Completed NCT03740815 - Feasibility of Serratus Plane Block Associated With Sedation in Axillary Dissection N/A
Completed NCT02524652 - Local Infiltration Analgesia vs Adductor Canal Block for Analgesia After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Phase 4
Completed NCT03913429 - Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block and Bimaxillary Osteotomy N/A
Completed NCT05012332 - Local Anesthesia Spread After an Erector Spinae Plane Block. N/A
Withdrawn NCT04015284 - Intraoperative Pain and Quality of Surgical Block During Shoulder Surgery Assessed by NOL Index N/A
Recruiting NCT05432934 - Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks With and Without Dexamethasone Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05512897 - Does ESP Block Reduce Pain and Opiates Consumption After Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04085263 - Rhomboid Intercostal and Subserratus Plane Block N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04001387 - Feasibility of Real-time Ultrasound-guided Spinal Anesthesia Using Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning
Active, not recruiting NCT05478629 - Safety of Regional Anesthesia in Ukraine: the Survey
Terminated NCT03296033 - Residual Anti-Xa Activity After Last Treatment Dose of Enoxaparin Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT02603900 - Adductor Canal Catheter vs Local Infiltration of Analgesia for Total Knee Arthroplasty Phase 4
Completed NCT03666845 - Plasma Ropivacaine Concentrations After Sciatic Nerve Block in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Completed NCT03394807 - LaGRA Trial in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT05558449 - Impact of Virtual Reality Hypno-sedation on Functional Recovery and Anxiety in Foot Surgery With Regional Anesthesia Phase 4
Completed NCT02433561 - Intra- Versus Extraplexic Catheter Placement for Continuous Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06147401 - Comparison of PENG Associated With LFCN Block Versus FICB for Multimodal Analgesic Management in THA N/A