Refractive Surgery Clinical Trial
Official title:
Accelerated Versus Standard Corneal Cross Linking in the Treatment of Ectasia Post Refractive Surgery and Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Long Term Randomized Trial.
WHAT WAS KNOWN
*Standard CXL is the common procedure for treating progressive corneal ectasia. Modifications
of the standard protocol were introduces to reduce its complications especially long exposure
to ultraviolet rays. The Accelerated protocol, while believed to overcome this issue with
comparable outcomes, has not been studied fully in patients with ectasia following corneal
refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty.
WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS Accelerated CXL is as safe and effective as the Standard CXL in halting
the progression of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty with the
benefit of: reduced ultraviolet exposure, reduced operation time, and reduced patient
discomfort.
Purpose:
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of the Standard CXL and the AC CXL
in patients with progressive corneal ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating
keratoplasty.
Setting:
Menoufia University Hospital, Egypt
Design:
Prospective, randomised comparison.
Methods:
Patients scheduled to receive either Standard CXL (3mW/cm2 for a period of 30 min) or
Accelerated CXL (18mW/cm2 for a period of 5 min).The main outcomes for comparison were the
change in; Maximum-K reading (K-max), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (SE), central
corneal thickness (CCT), and the best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00565695 -
Evaluation of the Aspheric ReSTOR Intraocular Lens (IOL) After Routine Cataract Extraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05406973 -
Comparison Between the SBK Microkeratome Versus Femtosecond Laser in Flap Creation During LASIK Surgery for Myopia
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05658718 -
Factors Influencing Nocturnal Symptoms After Refractive Surgery.
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06448468 -
Analysis of Ocular Surface Microbiota in Dry Eye Patients After Refractive Surgery
|
||
Withdrawn |
NCT00466908 -
Accuracy of the Pentacam and IOL Master to Calculate the Effective Corneal Power After Corneal Refractive Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT05060094 -
Comparison of Outcomes Between TransPRK and Off-flap Epi-LASIK
|
||
Completed |
NCT04396990 -
The RESTORE Study, A Randomized, Controlled, Masked (Reading Center) Prospective Study
|
||
Completed |
NCT03938883 -
Ocular Bandage Gel (OBG) Pivotal Trial in Patients Undergoing Photorefractive Keratectomy ("PRK")
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04281862 -
DEXTENZA Compared to Topical Prednisolone in Patients Undergoing Bilateral LASIK Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04684888 -
Femto-flap Versus SBK Flap,Predictability and Variability
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06264804 -
Risk Factors for Progressive Suction Loss in Corneal Refractive Surgery
|
||
Completed |
NCT03569423 -
Comparison Between TPRK Versus AAPRK in Correction of Myopia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02614625 -
Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography of the Eye
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04899258 -
Evaluation of the Effect of Myopic Femtosecond Laser Assisted-LASIK on Anterior Chamber Flare Values and Corneal Endothelial Cells: A Prospective Before-and-After Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00742950 -
Refractive Change Induced by 2.8-mm Corneal Incision
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03597906 -
Topography Guided LASIK by Different Protocols for Treatment of Astigmatism
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05037370 -
CONTOURA vs WFO Ablation PRK & LASIK
|
N/A |