Refractive Errors Clinical Trial
Official title:
A New More Efficient Cycloplegia Scheme
The purpose of this study is to determine whether tropicamide + phenylephrine cyclopentolate + applied for once waiting 30 minutes to retinoscopy (new scheme) is not inferior to apply cyclopentolate alone and wait 45 minutes to retinoscopy (traditional scheme)
Status | Unknown status |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | September 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | August 2014 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 1 Year to 10 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Children between 1 and 10 years Exclusion Criteria: - Strabismus - Ocular surgery - Another ocular disease than ametropias (i.e uveitis, cataract) - Cardiovascular or neurologic disease. - Allergy to any of drugs used in the study |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Chile | Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Departamento de Oftalmología | Santiago |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile |
Chile,
Alimgil ML, Erda N. [The cycloplegic effect of atropine in comparison with the cyclopentolate-tropicamide-phenylephrine combination]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1992 Jul;201(1):9-11. German. — View Citation
Anderson HA, Bertrand KC, Manny RE, Hu YS, Fern KD. Comparison of two drug combinations for dilating dark irides. Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;87(2):120-4. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181cc8da3. — View Citation
Bagheri A, Givrad S, Yazdani S, Reza Mohebbi M. Optimal dosage of cyclopentolate 1% for complete cycloplegia: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 May-Jun;17(3):294-300. — View Citation
Chen J, Xie A, Hou L, Su Y, Lu F, Thorn F. Cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refractions of Chinese neonatal infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Apr 14;52(5):2456-61. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5441. — View Citation
Ebri A, Kuper H, Wedner S. Cost-effectiveness of cycloplegic agents: results of a randomized controlled trial in nigerian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1025-31. — View Citation
Egashira SM, Kish LL, Twelker JD, Mutti DO, Zadnik K, Adams AJ. Comparison of cyclopentolate versus tropicamide cycloplegia in children. Optom Vis Sci. 1993 Dec;70(12):1019-26. — View Citation
Fan DS, Rao SK, Ng JS, Yu CB, Lam DS. Comparative study on the safety and efficacy of different cycloplegic agents in children with darkly pigmented irides. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004 Oct;32(5):462-7. — View Citation
Hofmeister EM, Kaupp SE, Schallhorn SC. Comparison of tropicamide and cyclopentolate for cycloplegic refractions in myopic adult refractive surgery patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Apr;31(4):694-700. — View Citation
Jones LW, Hodes DT. Possible allergic reactions to cyclopentolate hydrochloride: case reports with literature review of uses and adverse reactions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1991 Jan;11(1):16-21. Review. — View Citation
Kleinstein RN, Mutti DO, Manny RE, Shin JA, Zadnik K. Cycloplegia in African-American children. Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Feb;76(2):102-7. — View Citation
Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CH, Su TC, Chen CJ, Hung PT. The cycloplegic effects of cyclopentolate and tropicamide on myopic children. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Aug;14(4):331-5. — View Citation
Lovasik JV, Kergoat H. Time course of cycloplegia induced by a new phenylephrine-tropicamide combination drug. Optom Vis Sci. 1990 May;67(5):352-8. — View Citation
Lovasik JV. Pharmacokinetics of topically applied cyclopentolate HCl and tropicamide. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986 Oct;63(10):787-803. — View Citation
Manny RE, Fern KD, Zervas HJ, Cline GE, Scott SK, White JM, Pass AF. 1% Cyclopentolate hydrochloride: another look at the time course of cycloplegia using an objective measure of the accommodative response. Optom Vis Sci. 1993 Aug;70(8):651-65. Review. — View Citation
McMullen M, Netland PA. Wait time as a driver of overall patient satisfaction in an ophthalmology clinic. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1655-60. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S49382. Epub 2013 Aug 20. — View Citation
Nishizawa AR, Orton RB, Cadera W. Comparison of 0.5% cyclopentolate plus 0.5% tropicamide and 1% cyclopentolate alone for mydriasis of dark irides. Can J Ophthalmol. 1988 Dec;23(7):299-300. — View Citation
Rengstorff RH, Doughty CB. Mydriatic and cycloplegic drugs: a review of ocular and systemic complications. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1982 Feb;59(2):162-77. Review. — View Citation
Salazar M, Shimada K, Patil PN. Iris pigmentation and atropine mydriasis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1976 Apr;197(1):79-88. — View Citation
Twelker JD, Mutti DO. Retinoscopy in infants using a near noncycloplegic technique, cycloplegia with tropicamide 1%, and cycloplegia with cyclopentolate 1%. Optom Vis Sci. 2001 Apr;78(4):215-22. — View Citation
* Note: There are 19 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | crying with the application | does the child cry with both schemes? | average 18 days | |
Other | eyes color and cycloplegia | there is a difference between the effectiveness of the schemes according to eye color? | average 18 days | |
Primary | Change in Spherical equivalent | In the first and second visit the spherical equivalent will be measured with retinoscopy. Change in spherical equivalent refraction from first visit to day average 18 days (second visit). On both visits the patient will receive different cyclopegia schemes. |
average 18 days | |
Secondary | Change in spherical refraction | Change in spherical refraction between visit 1 and 2. | average 18 days | |
Secondary | Change in cylindrical refraction | Change in cylindrical refraction between visit 1 and 2 | average 18 days | |
Secondary | iris motility | both schemes are effective in cycloplegia ? In visit 1 and 2 the iris motility after the cyclopegic schemes will be evaluated | average 18 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04532099 -
Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Wear Frequent Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05039112 -
Clinical Comparison of 2 Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03670303 -
Trial of an Educational Intervention to Promote Spectacle Use Among Secondary School Children in Islamabad, Pakistan
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02255474 -
Bifocal Lenses In Nearsighted Kids
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03222661 -
Direct Comparison of SVOne Obtained Refraction to Subjective Manifest Refraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04055519 -
Clinical Performance Assessment of a Daily Wear Monthly Replacement Soft Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05049070 -
Study to Evaluate the Reliability, Validity and Safety of Subjective Mobile Refraction
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04527978 -
Clinical Comparison of 2 Daily Disposable Contact Lenses - Pilot Study 1
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01430247 -
Vision Screening for the Detection of Amblyopia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06077682 -
Cycloplegic Refraction in Pediatric Patients With Esotropia
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04077086 -
Correcting Myopia Among Secondary School Children to Increase Academic High School Attendance Rates in Rural Communities
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04528017 -
Clinical Comparison of 2 Daily Disposable Contact Lenses - Pilot Study 2
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT04352868 -
Customizing Myopia Control With Multifocal Toric Contact Lens
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04338880 -
Academic Performance and Refractive Error
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04545073 -
Outcomes of a Trifocal IOL in Post-refractive Patients
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05992675 -
Air Optix® Night and Day® Aqua Continuous Wear
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05976750 -
Air Optix® Night and Day® Aqua Daily Wear
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04693247 -
Handheld Device Compared With a Standard Eye Care Diagnostic Device in Measuring Ophthalmic Refraction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06065631 -
Seeing to Learn in Sierra Leone
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05550740 -
Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy for Shortening Axial Length
|
N/A |