Efficacy of ERCP in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis

Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis Clinical Trial

— ESPRIT  

Official title:

Efficacy of ERCP in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06364397
• Other study ID #: ESPRIT202403
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: April 2024
• Est. completion date: May 2026

Study information

• Verified date: April 2024
• Source: Changhai Hospital
• Contact: Lianghao Hu, M.D.
• Phone: +86-13817593520
• Email: lianghao-hu[@]smmu.edu.cn
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) works to treat idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis (IRAP) in adults. It also clarify the efficacy of ERCP in the diagnosis of IRAP. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does ERCP reduce the frequency of pancreatitis episodes in IRAP patients? Does ERCP contribute to identify the etiology of IRAP patients?

Participants will be randomly allocated to receive ERCP (pancreatic sphincterotomy and pancreatic stent placement) or conservative treatment and be followed for 1 year.

Description:

Recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) is defined as 2 or more distinct episodes of acute pancreatitis (AP) with complete resolution between each episode, and absence of irreversible structural and functional changes in pancreas. RAP has an estimated annual incidence of 8-10 per 100,000 and the recurrence rate is as high as 10-30% in AP patients. At present, biliary, alcoholic and hypertriglyceridemia are common causes of RAP. There are also a variety of causes that may contribute to recurrent episodes of AP, such as gene mutations, pancreas divisum, ampullary neoplasms and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. About 80% of RAP patients can be identified through routine clinical investigations (include proper history, physical examination, imaging examination); however, the etiology in up to 20% of cases still not be clarified and these patients is called idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis (IRAP).

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an important minimally invasive treatment for pancreatic diseases. However, the role of ERCP in IRAP patients with normal biliary and pancreatic anatomy remains controversial and there is a lack of high-quality clinical research evidence on endoscopic treatment of IRAP. In a small sample size (N=34) open-label randomized controlled study, IRAP patients were assigned to the experimental group with pancreatic duct stent placement and the control group with selective pancreatograms but no stent. This study demonstrated that stent placement was able to reduce the recurrence rate of AP (53% vs 11%, P < 0.02). Coté et al performed an open-label randomized trial (N=89) of ERCP with sphincter of Oddi manometry for IRAP patients. Among patients with pancreatic sphincter dysfunction, they found that biliary sphincterotomy and combination of biliary and pancreatic sphincterotomy have similar effects in preventing recurrence of AP, and there was also no significant difference between biliary sphincterotomy and sham surgery in patients with normal sphincter of Oddi manometry. However, some retrospective studies had shown that sphincterotomy works to reduce the recurrence rate of acute pancreatitis.

Currently, there is a shortage of high-quality evidence, and the wide variation in different study designs has led to controversial conclusions. Given the long-standing controversy, we propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of ERCP in the diagnosis and treatment of Idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 158
• Est. completion date: May 2026
• Est. primary completion date: March 2026
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 70 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Aged 18 to 70 years.

2. Patients diagnosed with IRAP:

1. Previously experienced 2 or more distinct episodes of acute pancreatitis (AP) with complete resolution between each episode, and absence of irreversible structural and functional changes in pancreas. The diagnosis of AP is based on the Atlanta criteria and is documented in the medical record.

2. The etiology of RAP remains undetermined after routine clinical investigations, including history, laboratory examination, imaging examination (CT, MRI/MRCP, EUS). Patients who still have AP episodes after elimination of the etiology also be included.

3. At least 1 episode of AP one year prior to enrollment.

4. Consent to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Prior sphincter intervention.

2. Not recovered from prior AP attack.

3. Prior pancreatic surgery.

4. Contraindications to ERCP.

5. Major mental illness or serious health problems that are not suitable for participation in the study.

6. Pregnancy or plan for pregnancy within 12 months of enrollment.

7. Other conditions that inappropriate to participant in the study.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pancreatitis
• Recurrence
• Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis

Intervention

Procedure:
• ERCP
Participants will undergo ERCP and indomethacin will be administered rectally before procedure in participants with no known allergy to indomethacin. If the etiology of the participant is clearly defined during ERCP, the corresponding endoscopic treatment procedure will be performed. For others whose etiology are still unclear, pancreatic sphincterotomy and small caliber prophylactic pancreatic duct stent replacement will be performed. The participants will be observed closely after ERCP and record complications. Abdominal X-rays will be taken 2 weeks after ERCP to confirm spontaneous passage of the pancreatic duct stent, and the stent will be removed via gastroscopy if it still in place.

Combination Product:
• Health education and conservative management of clinical routines
Participants will be given health education and conservative management of clinical routines. Clinical management is based on the pancreatic endocrine and exocrine function.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
China	Changhai Hospital	Shanghai	Shanghai

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Changhai Hospital	First People's Hospital of Hangzhou, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (8)

Ahmed Ali U, Issa Y, Hagenaars JC, Bakker OJ, van Goor H, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Bollen TL, van Ramshorst B, Witteman BJ, Brink MA, Schaapherder AF, Dejong CH, Spanier BW, Heisterkamp J, van der Harst E, van Eijck CH, Besselink MG, Gooszen HG, van Santvoort HC, Boermeester MA; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Risk of Recurrent Pancreatitis and Progression to Chronic Pancreatitis After a First Episode of Acute Pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 May;14(5):738-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.040. Epub 2016 Jan 6. — View Citation

Cote GA, Imperiale TF, Schmidt SE, Fogel E, Lehman G, McHenry L, Watkins J, Sherman S. Similar efficacies of biliary, with or without pancreatic, sphincterotomy in treatment of idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2012 Dec;143(6):1502-1509.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Sep 11. — View Citation

Guda NM, Trikudanathan G, Freeman ML. Idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Oct;3(10):720-728. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30211-5. — View Citation

Jacob L, Geenen JE, Catalano MF, Geenen DJ. Prevention of pancreatitis in patients with idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis: a prospective nonblinded randomized study using endoscopic stents. Endoscopy. 2001 Jul;33(7):559-62. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-15314. — View Citation

Machicado JD, Yadav D. Epidemiology of Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: Similarities and Differences. Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Jul;62(7):1683-1691. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4510-5. Epub 2017 Mar 9. — View Citation

Sankaran SJ, Xiao AY, Wu LM, Windsor JA, Forsmark CE, Petrov MS. Frequency of progression from acute to chronic pancreatitis and risk factors: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2015 Nov;149(6):1490-1500.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.066. Epub 2015 Aug 20. — View Citation

Strand DS, Law RJ, Yang D, Elmunzer BJ. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Endoscopic Approach to Recurrent Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis: Expert Review. Gastroenterology. 2022 Oct;163(4):1107-1114. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.07.079. Epub 2022 Aug 22. — View Citation

Wehrmann T. Long-term results (>/= 10 years) of endoscopic therapy for sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2011 Mar;43(3):202-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255922. Epub 2010 Nov 24. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Recurrence rate of AP	Proportion of patients with at least one episode of AP 1 year after enrollment (AP within 1 month of the index ERCP was excluded).	1 year after enrollment
Secondary	Ratio of reduced AP episodes	Ratio of the reduced AP episodes (1 year before and after enrollment) to the AP episodes in 1 year before enrollment. AP within 1 month of the index ERCP was excluded.	1 year after enrollment
Secondary	Proportion of patients with reduced AP episodes	Proportion of patients whose AP episodes reduced (1 year before and after enrollment). AP within 1 month of the index ERCP was excluded.	1 year after enrollment
Secondary	Severity of AP	Proportion of patients with different severity of AP that according to the Atlanta criteria.	1 year after enrollment
Secondary	Evaluation of quality of life	Evaluate by the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) that measures health on eight dimensions. For each dimension, item scores are coded, summed, and transformed into a scale from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health).	1 year after enrollment
Secondary	Evaluation of psychological condition	Evaluate by the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), which consists of 21 items with a total score of 0-63. The higher the score, the more serious the adverse psychological state of the patient.	1 year after enrollment
Secondary	Proportion of patients diagnosed by ERCP.	Proportion of patients whose etiology was identified by ERCP.	1 year after enrollment