Clinical Trials Logo

Rectocele clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Rectocele.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06330857 Active, not recruiting - Fecal Incontinence Clinical Trials

Recurrence and Bowel Function After Laparoscopic Vaginorectopexy, a Modified Anterior Rectopexy

Start date: May 28, 2002
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Several pelvic prolapses can render defecation difficulties and they are often treated with different surgical techniques. This study will evaluate a novel variation of a laparoscopic technique used to treat rectal prolapse that is modified to treat multiple pelvic prolapses. 25 women with symptoms of obstructed defecation and multiple pelvic prolapses are assessed before and after surgery with clinical examination, defecography and a questionnaire for bowel function and quality of life. Follow up was scheduled after three and twelve months and at long term (minimum ten years).

NCT ID: NCT04627610 Active, not recruiting - Rectal Prolapse Clinical Trials

Recurrence of Dyschezia in Rectal Prolapse, Rectocele and Elytrocele

PEXITY
Start date: March 9, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Prolapse of the rectum is a pathology that preferentially affects older women with a significant impact on quality of life. A very large number of therapeutic approaches can be proposed (functional treatment, surgical techniques by perineal approach and surgical techniques by anterior approach). D'Hoore and Pennix described Ventral Rectopexy with prosthetic reinforcement which is accepted as a standard of treatment in much of Europe for externalized prolapse but remains maligned in much of the world. Due to the relatively recent appearance of this technique and the great variability in the management methods, the long-term results of Ventral Rectopexy have been little studied. This surgical technique is the preferred approach offered at CHU Grenoble Alpes. Pr Faucheron have internationally recognized experience in surgical grip with a very high patient volume in recent years.

NCT ID: NCT03714607 Active, not recruiting - Cystocele Clinical Trials

Laser Therapy in Managing Vaginal Prolapse

Start date: November 30, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Efficacy of laser therapy in postmenopausal women with symptomatic prolapse stage >1. Assessment tools will include prolapse stage quantification system (POP-Q) and validated condition related questionnaires.

NCT ID: NCT02800512 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Start date: December 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of R-SCP versus HUSLS for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

NCT ID: NCT02231099 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery

VROUW2
Start date: January 2011
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pelvic organ prolapse is highly prevalent in the female population. The recurrence rate of pelvic organ prolapse after surgical treatment is high. This emphasizes the clinical need for improvement of the surgical techniques currently used. Placement of a mesh aims at reducing the recurrence rate. In this study the investigators compare the effectiveness of the Tension free Vaginal mesh + Monocryl with standard vaginal prolapse surgery without mesh.

NCT ID: NCT01097200 Active, not recruiting - Cystocele Clinical Trials

Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse

Start date: May 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Pelvic prolapse is one of the most frequent pathology in Gynecology. Recurrency of the prolapse after primary surgery is relatively high, 15-30%. Sacrocolpopexy has showed to be effective but it requires a long learning curves and is more aggressive. New meshes techniques seem to be effective, as well, with less learning curve but they are expensive and there are no randomize studies published. The investigators aim is to compare both techniques in terms of: anatomical and functional efficacy, cost, operating time and complications.