View clinical trials related to Rectal Prolapse.
Filter by:Rectal prolapse is a medical condition where rectum is protruding through the anal opening. The treatment is by surgery that can be performed with an anterior approach through the abdomen or a posterior perineal approach. The condition is more common in elderly patients and much more common in women compared to men. All used surgical techniques have advantages and disadvantages. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate if an abdominal or perineal surgical approach is best to correct a rectal prolapse. The outcome measures will be validated questionnaires on quality of Life (SF-36) and bowel function (modified Wexner incontinence score) as well as recurrence of the rectal prolapse and surgical complications. The study is a randomized multicenter trial with a 2x2 factorial design. Patients will be randomized between perineal and abdominal approach in a first randomization and the perineal group will then further be randomized into one of two specific operations (delorme or altemeier) and the abdominal group will be further randomized into suture rectopexy or resection rectopexy. The patients will be followed for 3 months, 1 year and 3 years and a longterm follow up of up to 17 years for recurrence.
The objective of the study will be to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome of patients with obstructed defecation sndrome (ODS) associated to internal rectal prolapse, treated with transanal prolassectomy (STARR) surgery compared to those treated with laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR).
The aim is to compare proximate and remote results of 3D and conventional 2D laparoscopic interventions in terms of efficacy and safety in treatment of symptomatic rectocele and rectal prolapse. This is a prospective randomized comparative study in parallel groups conducted in single Colorectal unit. Inclusion criteria: female patients with stage 3 rectocele (3-4 POP-Q [pelvic organ prolapse quantification] grade) and/or full-thickness rectal prolapse. Intervention - laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. The primary outcome is objective cure rate of pelvic prolapse. Secondary outcomes include obstructive defecation and incontinence symptoms according to Wexner and Cleveland Clinic scales, and satisfaction according to Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire. Operative times, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postop pain severity, urinary incontinence, as well as surgical and mesh complications are also assessed. The specific point of interest in this study is surgeon's tiredness after the operation assessed with Profile of Mood States questionnaire.
Prolapse of the rectum is a pathology that preferentially affects older women with a significant impact on quality of life. A very large number of therapeutic approaches can be proposed (functional treatment, surgical techniques by perineal approach and surgical techniques by anterior approach). D'Hoore and Pennix described Ventral Rectopexy with prosthetic reinforcement which is accepted as a standard of treatment in much of Europe for externalized prolapse but remains maligned in much of the world. Due to the relatively recent appearance of this technique and the great variability in the management methods, the long-term results of Ventral Rectopexy have been little studied. This surgical technique is the preferred approach offered at CHU Grenoble Alpes. Pr Faucheron have internationally recognized experience in surgical grip with a very high patient volume in recent years.
The purpose of this observational study is to evaluate the clinical outcome of a modified d'Hoore technique for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in patients with primary rectal prolapse, rectocele and/or enterocele.The goal of the study will be achieved by reporting the peri- and postoperative complications ((serious) adverse events), recurrences and re-interventions. Pre-operative to postoperative changes in pain, functional outcome and quality of life will be evaluated as well.
from December 2016 to July 2019, 36 elderly co-morbid patients with rectal prolapse were involved in this study which is performed in the GIT surgery unit of Zagazig University Hospital. the investigators used a modified linear stapler resection technique for the rectal prolapse. Postoperative follow up was done for one year to evaluate functional outcome, operative time, hospital stay and complications
Cap-assisted endoscopic sclerotherapy (CAES) is a new interventional therapy for internal hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse under colonoscopy. However, the long-term efficacy and safety of CAES in the treatment of internal hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse are still not clear due to the lack of large sample studies. Therefore, a nationwide multi-center, large sample, prospective and cohort study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAES in the treatment of internal hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse, to provide reliable evidence for popularization of this minimally invasive technology.
The general objective of the study is to confirm the medium/long-term safety and clinical performance of the CELLIS Rectopexy membrane used in rectal prolapse repair by ventral rectopexy and to identify emerging risks in comparison to the clinical data related to other types of fixation material. The present study will be a prospective multicentric non-randomized and non-controlled trial involving 55 patients followed for 24 months. The study will be conducted in France in 3 investigational centres.
Purpose: to compare Laparoscopic mesh rectopexy with laparoscopic suture rectopexy The operative time, recurrence rate, post-operative constipation, and effect on fecal incontinence, were reported and evaluated for each group Results:
Evaluation of robot Da Vinci Xi by determining its learning curve.The operating time will be defined by patient then the operating average will be calculated.