View clinical trials related to Rectal Carcinoma.
Filter by:THEODORA is a prospective pilot clinical trial aiming at first to evaluate and validate the predictive value of the A & MS bioassays on tumor control by radiotherapy.
The study evaluates the feasibility and advantage of modified laparoscopic double-staple anastomosis technique which to eliminate the 'dog ears' in laparoscopic rectal anterior resection.
Background Surgery for mid and low rectal cancer is associated with relative high rates of incomplete mesorectal excisions and high rates of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement resulting in significant number of local recurrences. Moreover, patients with mid and low rectal cancer suffer from high rates of morbidity, permanent colostomies and impairment of quality of life. The transanal TME (TaTME) has been developed to improve the quality of TME surgery in mid and low rectal cancer. Study design The COLOR III trial is an international multicentre randomised study comparing short- and long-term outcomes of TaTME and laparoscopic TME for rectal cancer. The study will include a quality assessment phase before randomisation to ensure required competency level and uniformity of the new TaTME technique and the laparoscopic TME. During the trial clinical data will be reviewed centrally to ensure uniform quality. Endpoints The primary endpoint of the study is the local recurrence rate at 3-years follow-up. Secondary endpoints include sphincter saving procedures, short-term morbidity and mortality, involved circumferential resection margin (CRM), disease-free and overall survival at 3 and 5 years, completeness of mesorectum and quality of life. Statistics In laparoscopic TME the percentage of local recurrence at 3-years follow-up is estimated 5%. With the non-inferiority margin set at 4%, with a one-sided level of significance of 2.5% and a power of 80%, a total of 1104 patients is needed, 669 patients in the TaTME arm and 335 patients in the laparoscopic TME arm. All analyses will be performed on intention-to-treat basis. Main selection criteria Patients with histologically proven single mid or distal rectum carcinoma (0 to 10 cm from anal verge) at MRI, eligible for restorative surgery with a curative intent, are included. Patients with a T1 tumor suitable for local excision, T3 tumors with a suspected involved circumferential resection margin and T4 tumors are excluded. Hypothesis The hypothesis is that TaTME will result in a comparable local recurrence rate at 3-years follow-up with benefit of lower morbidity and conversions. Furthermore, because of direct endoscopic visualization, even in very low tumors a coloanal anastomosis can be created, resulting in a lower colostomy rate compared with laparoscopic and open resection. Because long-term outcomes are unknown, within a trial setting the technique can be standardized and quality control can be performed.
The purpose of the study is to compare pre-operative radio-chemotherapy (RT + capecitabine) to a short course RT associated with a delayed surgery, with two primary objectives: the efficacy evaluation (rate of R0 resection) and the preservation of autonomy (score IADL).
This phase II MATCH screening and multi-sub-trial studies how well treatment that is directed by genetic testing works in patients with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myelomas that may have spread from where it first started to nearby tissue, lymph nodes, or distant parts of the body (advanced) and does not respond to treatment (refractory). Patients must have progressed following at least one line of standard treatment or for which no agreed upon treatment approach exists. Genetic tests look at the unique genetic material (genes) of patients' tumor cells. Patients with genetic abnormalities (such as mutations, amplifications, or translocations) may benefit more from treatment which targets their tumor's particular genetic abnormality. Identifying these genetic abnormalities first may help doctors plan better treatment for patients with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma.
This phase I trial studies the side effects of vaccine therapy and pembrolizumab in treating patients with solid tumors that have spread to other places in the body and usually cannot be cured or controlled with treatment, that have failed prior therapy, and that cannot be removed by surgery. Vaccines made from a gene-modified virus may help the body build an effective immune response to kill tumor cells. Monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may block tumor growth in different ways by targeting certain cells. Giving vaccine therapy together with pembrolizumab may be a better treatment in patients with solid tumors.
RATIONALE: Using small radiation beamlets of different intensity, IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy) allows shaping the dose around planning target volume with better sparing of normal tissue comparing to 3D conformal radiotherapy. It allows daily delivery of higher dose to the tumor with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB), consequently shortening total treatment time with potentially better response to treatment. In advanced rectal adenocarcinoma excellent response to preoperative radiochemotherapy with complete eradication of the primary tumor observed in the histopathological specimen (pathological complete response, pCR) correlates with a favorable overall prognosis, so trying to achieve better response to preoperative treatment with higher pCR seams feasible. PURPOSE:The hypothesis of this study is that in preoperative radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma shortening of the total treatment time with IMRT-SIB to 22 daily fractions concomitant with capecitabine results in an improved pCR rate from 9% (Slovenian trial) to 25%. Secondary objectives are to evaluate pathological down-staging rate, histopathological R0 resection rate, sphincter preservation rate, perioperative surgical complication rate, local control, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), late toxicity and quality of life.
Phase II study of up-front chemotherapy and neo-adjuvant shortcourse radiotherapy for resectable rectal carcinoma. Study Design: Phase II, open-label, single-arm, multi-centre study. STUDY PRODUCT,DOSE,ROUTE,REGIMEN AND DURATION OF ADMINISTRATION: 1. Neoadjuvant Treatment (pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy regimen): FOLFOX4* 2 cycles (WK1+WK3) - Tomotherapy** (WK5) - FOLFOX4* 2 cycles (WK7+WK9) * Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 iv: day 1 Levofolinate 100 mg/m2 iv: day 1-2 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 iv in bolus and 600 mg/m2 iv infusion over 22h: day 1-2 Every cycle will last 2 weeks (approximately 48 hours of treatment infusion and 12 days of rest). ** 25 Gy in 5 consecutive fractions, one fraction per day in 5 days on CTV (Clinical Target Volume) at the isodose of the 95% of the total dose. The treatment plan will be elaborated at the work-station dedicated to the Helicoidal Tomotherapy. The treatment could be planned also with linear accelerator with IGRT-IMRT technique or VMAT technique. 2. Restaging (week 11) 3. Surgery (week 12-16) with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) 4. End Of Treatment (week 16-32) 5. Adjuvant therapy (The maximum interval between surgery and start of adjuvant therapy should be 8 weeks): 6. FOLFOX4* 8 cycles (every 2 weeks) Study Duration: about 5 years. Enrollment period: 36 months. Treatment period: about 8 months. Follow-up: 1 year. NUMBER OF SUBJECTs: · Step A: a maximum of 6 patients. 6 evaluable patients are needed to assess toxicity. If 1 toxicity resulting in discontinuation of treatment will be observed in 6 patients, the treatment can be considered safe (with a confidence > 90%). If 2 or more toxicity resulting in discontinuation of treatment on 6 patients, the study will be stopped because not safe and another type of radiotherapy schedule must be designed. · Step B: a total of 50 patients is required to be recruited in 2 years (including patients enrolled in Step A). The goal is to achieve a proportion of at least 15% of patients with a complete pathological response with the new radiochemotherapeutic treatment.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and oncological feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted surgery for low rectal carcinoma compared with open surgery.
This is a single arm, single center pilot study of 40 patients with uT3N0 or uT1-3N+ rectal cancer receiving pre-operative chemoradiation. Subjects will undergo PET/MRI scans before and after surgery.