Effectiveness of Cyanoacrylate Glue in the Fixation of Midline and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Hospitalized Adult Patients: Randomised Clinical Trial (CIANO-ETI)

Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

— CIANO-ETI  

Official title:

Effectiveness of Cyanoacrylate Glue in the Fixation of Midline and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Hospitalized Adult Patients: Randomised Clinical Trial (CIANO-ETI)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05299060
• Other study ID #: 01-20
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: September 16, 2020
• Est. completion date: September 30, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: September 2022
• Source: Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Introduction: Venous access is increasingly necessary and essential in healthcare institutions, where more than 75% of hospitalised patients have some type of vascular access device cannulated. Due to their pathophysiological characteristics and pharmacological needs, some patients require special catheters, such as midline or peripherally inserted central catheters. In an attempt to reduce the main complications related to these, the safety of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive has recently been demonstrated in the post-insertion treatment of vascular access devices.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of the use of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive as fixation in the post-insertion of cannulated middle and central venous catheters with modified micro-Seldinger technique in acute hospitalized patients.

Methods: Randomised clinical trial with two groups(1:1): control and intervention. The control group received a cure with sutureless device plus transparent membrane and the intervention group received the same cure plus the cyanoacrylate glue. The study was approved by the Drug Research Ethics Committee of the Lleida health region. health region.

KEYWORDS: Cyanoacrylates; Vascular Access Device; Catheterization, Peripheral; Nursing Care; Randomized Controlled Trial.

Description:

A randomized clinical study with two arms (control group and intervention group) was performed.

Patients were selected according to whether they met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and all patients who met the criteria were offered to participate on a voluntary basis. These were collected by the intravenous therapy team (ETI) of the Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital (HUAV) in Lleida, from September 16, 2020 until the completion of the collection of the total number of patients required for the study (n=216).

Patients required insertion of a midline venous catheter (BD-18580 PowerMidline™ 4F) or a peripherally inserted central catheter (BD-20178 PowerPICC™ 4,5 or 6 F), according to the ETI-HUAV algorithm. All insertions were performed with the aid of ultrasound as a guiding technique. In addition, all patients underwent dermatotomy during the technique and the application of a post-insertion hemostasis protocol for at least 2 minutes or until the insertion site stopped bleeding, in order to unify the researchers' criteria.

After insertion of the vascular access device, the control group underwent the standard dressing: transparent polyurethane dressing with reinforced edge (3M®-1655 Tegaderm™ IV) and Sutureless Fixation Device (BD-19940 StatLock™ PICC Plus); and the intervention group, the standard dressing plus application of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (SP-015V SecurePortIV™ from Adhezion Biomedical, Llc.).

Afterwards, 3 scheduled cures were performed, at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days post-insertion, looking for the main complications: bleeding and/or pericatheter exudate, catheter displacement, signs of phlebitis and catheter-related pain.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 216
• Est. completion date: September 30, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: September 30, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 99 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• over 18 years of age

• requiring cannulation of a midline catheter (BD-18580 PowerMidline™ 4F) or a PICC (BD-20178 PowerPICC™ 4.5 or 6 F)

• who accepted and signed the informed consent voluntarily

• with an inpatient unit admission of minimum 7 days

Exclusion Criteria:

• patients with skin conditions contraindicating the application of a skin glue or known allergy to cyanoacrylate, as recorded in the clinical history

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Catheterization, Peripheral
• Nursing Care
• Randomized Controlled Trial
• Vascular Access Device

Intervention

Procedure:
• cyanoacrylate adhesive (SecurePortIV®)
Application of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (SecurePortIV®) to the puncture site plus standard wound care.
• standard cure
The standard cure consists of: Application of hemostasis at the point of insertion for 2 minutes post puncture or until bleeding stops. Fix with clear polyurethane dressing (3M®-1655 Tegaderm™ IV) and sutureless fixation device (BD-19940 StatLock™ PICC Plus).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Spain	Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova	Lleida	Cataluña

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

References & Publications (28)

Alexandrou E, Ray-Barruel G, Carr PJ, Frost S, Inwood S, Higgins N, Lin F, Alberto L, Mermel L, Rickard CM. International prevalence of the use of peripheral intravenous catheters. J Hosp Med. 2015 Aug;10(8):530-3. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2389. Epub 2015 Jun 3. — View Citation

Babaieasl F, Yarandi HN, Saeidzadeh S, Kheradmand M. Comparison of EMLA and Diclofenac on Reduction of Pain and Phlebitis Caused by Peripheral IV Catheter: A Randomized-Controlled Trial Study. Home Healthc Now. 2019 Jan/Feb;37(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000704. — View Citation

Biasucci DG, Pittiruti M, Taddei A, Picconi E, Pizza A, Celentano D, Piastra M, Scoppettuolo G, Conti G. Targeting zero catheter-related bloodstream infections in pediatric intensive care unit: a retrospective matched case-control study. J Vasc Access. 2018 Mar;19(2):119-124. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000797. Epub 2018 Feb 19. — View Citation

Bodenham A. Vascular acces. Rev Med Clin Condes [Internet]. 2017;28(5):701-12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2017.07.011

Braga LM, Parreira PM, Oliveira ASS, Mónico LDSM, Arreguy-Sena C, Henriques MA. Phlebitis and infiltration: vascular trauma associated with the peripheral venous catheter. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;26:e3002. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2377.3002. Epub 2018 May 17. Portuguese, Spanish, English. — View Citation

Bugden S, Shean K, Scott M, Mihala G, Clark S, Johnstone C, Fraser JF, Rickard CM. Skin Glue Reduces the Failure Rate of Emergency Department-Inserted Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;68(2):196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.026. Epub 2015 Dec 31. — View Citation

Chaves F, Garnacho-Montero J, Del Pozo JL, Bouza E, Capdevila JA, de Cueto M, Domínguez MÁ, Esteban J, Fernández-Hidalgo N, Fernández Sampedro M, Fortún J, Guembe M, Lorente L, Paño JR, Ramírez P, Salavert M, Sánchez M, Vallés J. Diagnosis and treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infection: Clinical guidelines of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology and (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC). Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2018 Jan - Feb;42(1):5-36. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2017.09.012. English, Spanish. — View Citation

Corley A, Marsh N, Ullman AJ, Rickard CM. Tissue adhesive for vascular access devices: who, what, where and when? Br J Nurs. 2017 Oct 26;26(19):S4-S17. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.19.S4. Review. — View Citation

Di Puccio F, Giacomarro D, Mattei L, Pittiruti M, Scoppettuolo G. Experimental study on the chemico-physical interaction between a two-component cyanoacrylate glue and the material of PICCs. J Vasc Access. 2018 Jan;19(1):58-62. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000816. — View Citation

Ellis ML, Okano S, McCann A, McDowall A, Van Kuilenburg R, McCarthy AL, Joubert W, Harper J, Jones M, Mollee P. Catheter-related thrombosis incidence and risk factors in adult cancer patients with central venous access devices. Intern Med J. 2020 Dec;50(12):1475-1482. doi: 10.1111/imj.14780. — View Citation

Fabiani A, Eletto V, Dreas L, Beltrame D, Sanson G. Midline or long peripheral catheters in difficult venous access conditions? A comparative study in patients with acute cardiovascular diseases. Am J Infect Control. 2020 Oct;48(10):1158-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.12.025. Epub 2020 Jan 21. — View Citation

Fujioka G, Newcomb P, Hunchusky C, Myers H, Behan D. Pain Perception of a Structured Vascular Access Team Approach to Short Peripheral Catheter (SPC) Placement Compared to SPC Placement by Bedside Nurses. J Infus Nurs. 2020 Jan/Feb;43(1):33-38. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000352. — View Citation

Goossens GA, De Waele Y, Jérôme M, Fieuws S, Janssens C, Stas M, Moons P. Diagnostic accuracy of the Catheter Injection and Aspiration (CINAS) classification for assessing the function of totally implantable venous access devices. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Feb;24(2):755-761. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2839-x. Epub 2015 Jul 26. — View Citation

Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, Broadhurst D, Clare S, Kleidon T, Meyer BM, Nickel B, Rowley S, Sharpe E, Alexander M. Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition. J Infus Nurs. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;44(1S Suppl 1):S1-S224. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396. — View Citation

Huskisson EC, Jones J, Scott PJ. Application of visual-analogue scales to the measurement of functional capacity. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1976 Aug;15(3):185-7. — View Citation

Kang J, Chen W, Sun W, Ge R, Li H, Ma E, Su Q, Cheng F, Hong J, Zhang Y, Lei C, Wang X, Jin A, Liu W. Peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients: a prospective study of over 50,000 catheter days. J Vasc Access. 2017 Mar 21;18(2):153-157. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000670. Epub 2017 Feb 8. — View Citation

Lacostena-Pérez ME, Buesa-Escar AM, Gil-Alós AM. Complications related to the insertion and maintenance of peripheral venous access central venous catheter. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2019 Jul - Sep;30(3):116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Sep 3. English, Spanish. — View Citation

Maddox RR, Rush DR, Rapp RP, Foster TS, Mazella V, McKean HE. Double-blind study to investigate methods to prevent cephalothin-induced phlebitis. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1977 Jan;34(1):29-34. — View Citation

Mihala G, Ray-Barruel G, Chopra V, Webster J, Wallis M, Marsh N, McGrail M, Rickard CM. Phlebitis Signs and Symptoms With Peripheral Intravenous Catheters: Incidence and Correlation Study. J Infus Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;41(4):260-263. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000288. — View Citation

Moureau N. Impact and Safety Associated with Accidental Dislodgement of Vascular Access Devices: A Survey of Professions, Settings, and Devices. JAVA - J Assoc Vasc Access. 2018 Dec 1;23(4):203-15.

Nicholson J, Hill J. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive: a new tool for the vascular access toolbox. Br J Nurs. 2019 Oct 24;28(19):S22-S28. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.19.S22. — View Citation

O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, Lipsett PA, Masur H, Mermel LA, Pearson ML, Raad II, Randolph AG, Rupp ME, Saint S; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):e162-93. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir257. Epub 2011 Apr 1. — View Citation

Reynolds H, Taraporewalla K, Tower M, Mihala G, Tuffaha HW, Fraser JF, Rickard CM. Novel technologies can provide effective dressing and securement for peripheral arterial catheters: A pilot randomised controlled trial in the operating theatre and the intensive care unit. Aust Crit Care. 2015 Aug;28(3):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 9. — View Citation

Rickard CM, Edwards M, Spooner AJ, Mihala G, Marsh N, Best J, Wendt T, Rapchuk I, Gabriel S, Thomson B, Corley A, Fraser JF. A 4-arm randomized controlled pilot trial of innovative solutions for jugular central venous access device securement in 221 cardiac surgical patients. J Crit Care. 2016 Dec;36:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 21. — View Citation

Rickard CM, Marsh N, Webster J, Runnegar N, Larsen E, McGrail MR, Fullerton F, Bettington E, Whitty JA, Choudhury MA, Tuffaha H, Corley A, McMillan DJ, Fraser JF, Marshall AP, Playford EG. Dressings and securements for the prevention of peripheral intravenous catheter failure in adults (SAVE): a pragmatic, randomised controlled, superiority trial. Lancet. 2018 Aug 4;392(10145):419-430. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31380-1. Epub 2018 Jul 26. — View Citation

Simonova G, Rickard CM, Dunster KR, Smyth DJ, McMillan D, Fraser JF. Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives - effective securement technique for intravascular catheters: in vitro testing of safety and feasibility. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012 May;40(3):460-6. — View Citation

Song IK, Kim EH, Lee JH, Jang YE, Kim HS, Kim JT. Seldinger vs modified Seldinger techniques for ultrasound-guided central venous catheterisation in neonates: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Dec;121(6):1332-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Sep 7. — View Citation

Zhang S, Guido AR, Jones RG, Curry BJ, Burke AS, Blaisdell ME. Experimental study on the hemostatic effect of cyanoacrylate intended for catheter securement. J Vasc Access. 2019 Jan;20(1):79-86. doi: 10.1177/1129729818779702. Epub 2018 Jun 20. — View Citation

* Note: There are 28 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.	Percentage of participants with adverse events after being treated with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive at the puncture site after insertion of cannulated middle and central venous catheters with the modified micro-Seldinger technique.	7 days
Secondary	Number of participants with post-treatment hemorrhage assessed by observation (yes/no).	Percentage of participants with pericatheter bleeding after puncture of a midline or central venous catheter with the modified micro-Seldinger technique. Four cures will be performed: post puncture, at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days, where the puncture site will be visualized for signs of bleeding and it will be noted whether there is bleeding or not.	7 days
Secondary	Number of participants with post-treatment catheter displacement assessed by observation (yes/no).	Percentage of participants with catheter displacement after puncture of a midline or central venous catheter with the modified micro-Seldinger technique. Four cures will be performed: post puncture, at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days, where the puncture site will be visualized to check if the catheter is still in the same point or if it has been displaced.	7 days
Secondary	Number of participants with post-treatment phlebitis assessed with the Maddox visual phlebitis rating scale.	Percentage of participants with phlebitis after puncture of a midline or central venous catheter with the modified micro-Seldinger technique. Four cures will be performed: post puncture, at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days, where the puncture site will be visualized to check for signs of phlebitis, according to the Maddox scale.	7 days
Secondary	Number of participants with post-treatment pain in extremity assessed with the EVA scale.	Percentage of participants with pain in extremity after puncture of a midline or central venous catheter with the modified micro-Seldinger technique. Four cures will be performed: post puncture, at 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days, where the patient will be asked what pain he/she feels in the extremity related to the catheter.	7 days