View clinical trials related to Radius Fractures.
Filter by:Rationale: For distal forearm fractures the investigators propose an anaesthetic method using an ultrasound guided axillary nerve block (ANB, an established technique) for pain reduction during reposition dislocated fractures. Nowadays a fracture hematoma block (FHB) is common practice, but is suboptimal due to variability between performing physicians and is often experienced as a painful procedure. The investigators want to investigate if ANB is an effective, safe and efficient option in pain reduction in patients of an ED (emergency department) population with a distal forearm fracture. Objective: To compare ultrasound-guided ANB with FHB for analgesia during reposition of non-operatively treated forearm fractures Study design: A randomized controlled trial. Study population: Patients ≥ 16 years of age with a closed, isolated and displaced distal forearm fracture requiring manipulative reposition. Intervention (if applicable): The intervention group will receive an ANB on the ipsilateral arm of the fracture. The control group will get a FHB. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is pain score on a 11-point NRS (numeric rating scale) (0-10) during closed reposition of the dislocated distal forearm fracture in both groups. Main endpoint of this study is achieving a reduction of at least 2 points between both groups. This is considered as clinical relevant. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients participating in the research group are believed to have less pain and more comfort during reposition of the dislocated fracture. The investigators expect no other or more complications compared to standard care since the known complications are the same for both infiltrative anaesthetic interventions and are rare. Moreover, both procedures are common practice, therefore potential complications will be taken care of properly. The investigators expect there is no prolonged length of stay in the ED.
The primary goal of this study is to compare functional outcomes (range of motion [flexion, extension, supination, pronation], return to work, of patients with distal radius fractures who receive intraoperative glucocorticoids to those that do not. Secondary goals include comparison of pain control (number of pain pills consumed, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores) between patients with distal radius fractures who receive intraoperative glucocorticoids to those that do not. The primary endpoint of this study will occur when 18 patients in each test-group complete the 6 month follow up visit for study.
This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT). This RCT which will study the effect of performing daily activities early after a distal radius fracture being treated conservatively in a cast. This study will have two groups. The experimental group will watch a video and be given a handout on how to perform daily activities with the hand of the injured wrist while in a cast and cast care. The control group will watch a video on cast care and be given a handout on cast care. Outcome measures will be taken at initial evaluation between 0-3 weeks, at 6 weeks, at 9 weeks, and at 3 months. Outcome measures will include the Michigan Wrist Evaluation, Visual Analog Pain Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 Scale, finger mobility testing, grip and pinch strength, and the 9 hole peg test to test fine motor coordination. Outcome measure scores will be compared between groups using a t-test statistical test. Outcome measure scores will also be tested within groups using a paired t-test.
The primary objective of this study is to determine if non-operative treatment of distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 and over leads to equal funtional results as operative treatment. To do so patients will be included from two "schools" in which treatment i seither predominantly operative or non-operative. There will be no study intervention as patients will be treated as per local standard of care. The study is set up as an international multicenter study. Those patients included in the study will be follow-up at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 1 year and 2 years after treatment was initiated. Our hypothesis is, that patients treated operatively will have better function than those treated non-operatively.
Kinesio tape is used successfully in the control of edema related to the extremity, especially in the control of lymphedema that develops after surgery.Kinesiotape is a non-allergic elastic tape applied to the skin surface.There are publications showing that kinesio tape applications are beneficial for edema control after interventional procedures such as anterior cruciate ligament surgery and knee prosthesis related to orthopedic surgical interventions. There is no publication on the effectiveness of kinesio tape application in the control and rehabilitation of post-cast edema of wrist fractures.It is planned to investigate the positive effects of kinesio tape in edema control and rehabilitation.
Wrist arthroscopy (WA) is a potentially useful adjuvant procedure in the surgical treatment (osteosynthesis) of distal radius fractures (DRFs). Previous research on the contribution of WA to DRF treatment has shown different results. Objectives of the study: (1) Validate wrist functional outcome questionnaires; (2) To determine whether arthroscopically assisted repositioning of fracture fragments in articular DRFs leads to a better treatment outcome; (3) To determine whether arthroscopic observation and treatment of associated soft tissue and / or cartilage injuries in articular DRFs leads to a better treatment outcome; (4) To determine whether arthroscopic observation and treatment of associated soft tissue and / or cartilage injuries in extraarticular DRFs leads to a better treatment outcome. Research hypotheses: (1) Validated questionnaires will have satisfactory measurement properties (validity, reliability) and will be able to be used in a WA randomized controlled trial; (2) WA as an adjunct to DRF osteosynthesis improves the clinical outcome of treatment. Subjects: 56 female patients with indication for DRF osteosynthesis aged 50-69 years divided into 2 groups: 1. examined - 28 patients with indication for DRF osteosynthesis (14 patients with extraarticular DRF and 14 patients with intraarticular DRF) with associated WA, and 2. control - 28 patients with indication for DRF osteosynthesis (14 patients with extraarticular DRF and 14 patients with intraarticular DRF) without associated WA. Methods: As a primary outcome measure, functional outcomes of treatment will be analyzed with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score at 3 and 6 months after surgery. As a secondary outcome measures it will be analyzed pain level according to a visual analog scale (VAS), preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters of distal radius, and clinical outcomes of treatment with the Mayo Wrist Score (MWS) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Expected scientific contribution: providing answers on the role of WA in the treatment of DRF and associated injuries as well as its impact on treatment outcome.
The purpose of this randomized control trial will be to determine whether the duration of bridge plate fixation of distal radius fractures can be reduced to 6-8 weeks without worsening of functional outcomes relative to the current standard of greater than 12 weeks of fixation. The secondary aim of the study is to determine whether a reduced duration of bridge plate fixation leads to an increase in wrist range of motion following plate removal compared to the standard duration of fixation. 100 patients with comminuted distal radius fractures that are indicated for bridge plate fixation will be randomized to the Accelerated Removal arm (n = 50) or the Standard Removal arm (n = 50).
Background: Several studies have investigated the degree of final displacement and its association with clinical outcome. There is still no consensus on the importance of radiological outcome and published studies do not use the same criteria for an acceptable alignment. Previous reports have used a linear or a dichotomized exposure in the statistical analysis, but no study has investigated a nonlinear association. Methods: We included 438 patients treated for a distal radius fracture (DRF) with either reduction and cast immobilization or surgery. Radiographic outcomes were determined by radiographs 3 months after the injury. Clinical outcome was determined by QuickDASH (qDASH), ROM and grip strength at 1-year after the injury. Nonlinear correlations were analysed with cubic splines.
It was designed as a randomized controlled prospective. After 2 weeks of splint follow-up, the splints of the patients who were operated due to distal radius fracture and volar plate were applied will be removed and included in the physical therapy program. The measurements and scores of the patients at the time of removal of the splint will be recorded. Patients' non-injured contralateral extremity data will also be recorded. The dominant party will be registered. Preoperative fracture classification of the patients, reduction parameters after surgery, waiting time for post-fracture surgery, pre-fracture chronic diseases, cognitive disorders, psychiatric disease histories, whether the patients lived alone at home or not will be recorded. Patients will be randomized with the help of a free computer aided numerator. The patients will be divided into two groups and conventional face-to-face rehabilitation will be applied to one group, and the previously planned tele-rehabilitation program will be applied to the other group.
Aim and objectives This study aimed to treat fractures of the distal end of the radius in the children with Robert Jones (RJ) bandage in comparison with a cast. The objective was to compare the frequency of occurrence of the complications, child comfortability, and family satisfaction with this treatment modality.