View clinical trials related to Radius Fractures.
Filter by:This is a limited two centre randomized controlled feasibility trial towards a larger definitive trial designed to assess whether bed side ultrasound can reduce the rate of surgical fixation following emergency department manipulation of Colles' type wrist fractures. UDiReCT will mirror the proposed design of the definitive trial but will report feasibility data such as recruitment rate, data completeness and reliability of potential definitive trial outcome measures.
Study design: Two consecutive prospective case series. Study population: Part 1 will enroll 10 healthy volunteers (50 years or older). Part 2 will enroll 10 elderly patients (50 years or older) with a dorsally displaced distal radius fracture (AO type 23-A-C) that is acceptably reduced. In both parts, participants should have no restrictions in activities of daily living pre-fracture and no evident anatomical difference between both wrists. Intervention: Part 1: Participants will wear the brace continuously for one week. Part 2: Participants will wear the brace as treatment of the fracture for five weeks (instead of a plaster cast). Main study parameters/endpoints: In parts 1 and 2, the primary outcome measure will be a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score for wearing comfort. Secondary outcome measures are the occurrence of fracture redislocation (part 2 only), pain (VAS), inconvenience during NL61002.078.17 / DRFB-Tolerability Distal Radius Fracture Brace Tolerability Version number: 1.1, d.d. April 24, 2017 8 of 34 activities of daily living (Katz Index), and adverse reactions like pain, skin pressure, skin irritation/redness, sensibility issues, or device-related problems.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen, are excellent medications for providing pain control in certain patients. There is some data to suggest that NSAIDs can be used to reduce postoperative pain and narcotic use in patients who had undergone carpal tunnel release. There are mixed results about the effect of bone healing in adult patients with broken bones. The investigators hypothesize that NSAID administration in the acute phase of distal radius fracture healing will be non-inferior for pain control and decrease the use of opioid analgesics compared to patients who take acetaminophen for pain control during this same time period. Furthermore, the investigators hypothesize that patients will have similar or better patient reported outcomes, range of motion, and strength with the administration of NSAIDs.
Distal fracture of the radial bone is the commonest fracture and is also connected to osteoporosis. Normally the operation is performed under neuroaxial blockade and sedation. When the blockade rapidly vanish many patients experience a rebound pain much severer that than the actual trauma pain. If long acting local anesthetics are used this will occur during night time and many patients will go to the emergency room for pain treatment. Short acting local anesthetics may make it possible to treat patients pain in-house prior to leaving the hospital. In this study
Even though broken wrists are of frequent occurrence, the investigators see a lack of extensive and well executed international studies to clarify which is the best treatment for elderly participants at 65+ years. The Danish Health and Medicines Authority recommend that broken wrists are treated with surgery by using plates and screws when certain radiological criteria are met. Recent studies show that, apparently, there are no advantages by operating rather than treating with plaster when comparing the functional results after one year. However, there is a 30 % risk of serious complications occurring after surgery. This study will examine the pros and cons that participants at 65+ years with broken wrists experience after, by lot, having been treated with either surgery (using plates and screws) or without surgery (using plaster for 5 weeks). The purpose of this study is to compare the complications and level of functioning between participants treated with surgery and without surgery.
Optimal fixation for highly comminuted distal radius fractures with metadiaphyseal extension remains to be a major treatment challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, feasibility and sample size estimations for a larger, definitive study comparing functional outcomes of patients treated with dorsal distraction plate fixation with or without fragment specific fixation to standard open reduction internal fixation in highly comminuted distal radius fractures (subtypes AO.23-C2 and AO.23-C3). The study design will be a pilot randomized control trial. Fracture pattern eligibility will be determined by consensus agreement between two fellowship trained upper extremity specialists. The primary outcome measure will be the QuickDASH score. Secondary outcome measures include wrist range of motion, grip strength, Visual Analog Scale pain scale, Short Form SF-12, and EQ-5D. Ultimately, this study will lead to a larger randomized control trial and result in improvement in the care and treatment of patients with these challenging injuries.
Background Fractures of the distal radius are among the most common. Major complications, including irritation and rupture of the extensor tendons, may occur if epiphyseal screws of inappropriate length are used. Questions/Purposes The main objective of the present study was to determine whether the optimal epiphyseal screw length can be determined by reference to the diaphyseal screw length. Methods Forty CT scans were semi-automatically segmented. A 3D model of the volar plate was affixed to each distal radius with simulation. The maximum lengths of the diaphyseal screws, as well as the four distal epiphyseal screws, were measured. Linear regression analysis was performed.
The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of early manual therapy on function, pain, range of motion (ROM), hand and pinch grip strength and disability level in patients underwent volar plating after distal radius fracture (DRF). Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Routin Physiotherapy (RP) or Early Manual Therapy (EMT). While RP group received routine physiotherapy, EMT group received routine physiotherapy plus Mulligan's Mobilization With Movement technique. All treatments were done two sessions a week, through 12 weeks. Function, pain, range of motion (ROM), hand and pinch grip strength and disability level of patients were assessed. Measurements were made at postoperative week 3, 6 and 12.
Subjects with acute, displaced distal radius fractures will be randomized at the time of emergency room evaluation to one of two commonly accepted splinting methods for displaced distal radius fractures: sugar tong splints or volar/dorsal clam shell splints. Reduction will be performed in the usual, standard fashion and the selected splint applied. Standard radiographic measurements of alignment, including radial height, volar tilt and inclination will be measured on pre- and post- reduction radiographs by a single reviewer- who will be blinded to splint application type. At the first fracture follow-up visit, typically occurring between 5-10 days, as in standard practice, repeat radiographs of the wrist will be taken, and the same reviewer will measure alignment. As a secondary outcome, patients will also complete the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire at this visit, to compare patients' ability to perform activities of daily living with their respective splints.
The purpose of the present study is to investigate pressure algometry and pressure-induced referred pain areas in pain free individuals with a history of distal radius fracture (fully recovered) compared with age and gender matched healthy controls without history of fracture. It is hypothesized that individuals with a recovered radius fracture will have a facilitated referred pain patter towards the wrist but normal pressure pain sensitivity.