Clinical Trials Logo

Radius Fractures clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Radius Fractures.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00788190 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Distal Radius Fractures

Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients

Start date: November 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to create and test a treatment algorithm to guide the treatment of distal radius fractures in patients 65 and older and to obtain level-one evidence to determine the best method of treating distal radius fractures in this growing population demographic.

NCT ID: NCT00654615 Completed - Clinical trials for Distal Radius Fractures

Fixation of Unstable Distal Radius Fractures

Start date: May 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Wrist fractures are the most common type of fractures that occur in the shoulder, arm, and hand. Approximately 250,000 to 300,000 wrist fractures occur in the United States each year. Although some wrist fractures can be treated using casts, many other fractures must be treated with surgery. The surgery involves using metal plates and screws to put the broken pieces of bone together so that they can heal. The purpose of this study is to compare two specific types of surgery that are used to treat broken wrists. One type uses pieces of metal that are placed on the outside of the broken pieces of bone that are screwed in place while the broken bones heal. The other type of surgery involves placing a piece of metal inside the bone marrow to hold the broken pieces of bone together as they heal. Individuals with broken wrists who participate in this study will be randomly assigned to receive one of the two types of surgical treatment. Both surgical treatments are approved and are not experimental. Study participants will be followed closely after surgery to determine the time required for them to return to their usual daily activities involving the use of their arms and hands. Although both groups of study participants are expected to experience the same outcomes at one year, those participants that receive the device placed inside the bone marrow may return to their normal functional activities earlier than the ones treated with the plate placed on the outside of the bone. Study participants and their surgeons will complete data sheets and questionnaires that will document their progress following treatment of their wrist fractures.

NCT ID: NCT00610220 Completed - Clinical trials for Distal Radius Fractures

Cast Versus Splint in Children With Acceptably Angulated Wrist Fractures

Start date: January 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The study will compare the effectiveness of a prefabricated wrist splint with thermoplast reinforcements versus a short arm cast in skeletally immature children. The hypothesis is that the commercially available wrist splint is at least as effective as traditional casting with respect to recovery of physical function.

NCT ID: NCT00609479 Completed - Clinical trials for Distal Radius Fracture

Comparison of Two Methods for Treatment of Colles´s Fracture

Start date: January 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare two different fixationmethods for fractures of the wrist(distal radius fractures). We are comparing an external fixation (Hoffmann-II-non-bridging) vs. an internal fixation(Micronail). Primary endpoint is patient satisfaction as scored by the DASH-questionnaire.Secondary followup is X-rays, strength, PRWE-questionnaire.

NCT ID: NCT00587795 Completed - Radius Fractures Clinical Trials

Orthopedic Study of the Aircast StabilAir Wrist Fracture Brace

Start date: April 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Objectives: - To obtain clinical evidence for the safety and efficacy in using the StabilAir Wrist Fracture Brace for the following cases: 1. Acute (emergency department) treatment of non-displaced, stable extra- articular distal radius fractures; 2. To obtain comparative data between traditional therapies (sugar tong, plaster backslab, long arm or short arm cast) and the use of the StabilAir brace for each patient qualified by specific criteria. This will provide a complete cost-of-care analysis from one modality to the other. Hypothesis: 1) For stable, non-displaced fractures, the StabilAir Brace is as effective as a sugar tong splint in the acute setting. 2) In cases where full forearm immobilization is initially preferred, the StabilAir is effective as a follow-up to sugar tong splitting once the need for full immobilization has passed. The benefit of utilizing a product of this type in the acute or follow-up setting is that it is an adjustable fit, "off-the-shelf" device, which can be quickly and comfortably applied to the patient. It can then transition effectively to be the product of choice for the remainder of treatment through rehabilitation since it will protect, stabilize, and support the injury while adapting to changing patient conditions and needs. Because it is removable (late but not early in fracture core period) there are potential benefits to comfort and hygiene. Therefore, the total cost of care is reduced by using one product from the progress of the injury to fracture reduction and through to recovery (rather than a variety of products that require investment in materials, time, and personnel for cast changes and potential fracture re-reduction. In the initial treatment period, the StabilAir Brace will be firmly held in place by a peripheral "guard wrap" and will only be removed under the supervision of the treating surgeon. Only when clear evidence of fracture healing is present would the patient be allowed to physically remove the brace.

NCT ID: NCT00524719 Completed - Clinical trials for Distal Radius Fractures

Comparison of Three Fixation Techniques for Displaced Distal Radius Fractures

DRF
Start date: January 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Distal radius fractures are the most common fracture to occur in the adult population, and those which are displaced but maintain joint congruity are the most common subtype. Locking-plate technology represents a true advance in the fixation of these fractures, especially in view of the ever increasing incidence of these injuries in an ageing and osteoporotic population throughout Europe and North America. These plates permit rigid fixation, even in osteopenic bone, while avoiding any tethering of soft tissues, as seen with external fixation and percutaneous pinning. For these reasons, this mode of fracture fixation has rapidly gained popularity. Unfortunately, there is presently little evidence to support their use over the more traditional methods of fixation (percutaneous pinning, external fixation). In addition, the technique for their application is more invasive and their cost is considerably greater than these latter two techniques. As such, it is pertinent to evaluate, in a scientifically sound fashion, the outcome of fixation with the three types of implant included in this study. The results of this clinical trial will allow the orthopaedic community to confidently recommend the fixation method which provides the optimal functional, clinical, and radiographic outcome for a patient suffering a displaced distal radius with preserved joint congruity. Null hypothesis: There is no difference in the functional, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of the three treatment methods. Hypothesis: Given the locking nature of modern screw-plate constructs, which produce excellent fixation even in osteopenic bone and permit early range of motion exercises; and given that plate fixation, in contrast to external fixation and percutaneous pinning, does not tether muscle, tendon, or capsule; plate fixation with a volar fixed-angle device should permit earlier and more aggressive rehabilitation and more rapid and complete regain of hand and wrist function when compared to stabilization with external fixation or percutaneous pinning.

NCT ID: NCT00438750 Completed - Clinical trials for Distal Radius Fractures

Comparison of Occupational Therapy and Home Exercises for Adults With Operatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures

Start date: January 2007
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare to ways of rehabilitating after surgery for distal radius fractures treated operatively with a volar plate.

NCT ID: NCT00438308 Completed - Clinical trials for Distal Radius Fractures

Comparison of Early and Late Therapy for Adults With Operatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures

Start date: December 2004
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of the study is to compare two common ways of rehabilitating after surgery for distal radius fractures treated operatively with a volar plate.

NCT ID: NCT00274378 Completed - Radius Fractures Clinical Trials

Allomatrix Injectable Putty in Distal Radius Fractures

Start date: June 2005
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Allomatrix is a combination of Demineralized Bone Matrix with a binding medium of calcium sulfate hemihydrate and carboxymethylcellulose. Allomatrix combines the osteoinductive capacity of DBM with the osteoconduction and controlled resorption of surgical grade calcium sulfate. Unstable fractures of the distal radius do not resist displacement once it has been manipulated into an anatomical position. There is a parallel between the quality of the anatomic result and the residual capacity of the wrist, except in older, low demanding patients. Injectable osteoconductive cements have been introduced to fill voids in metaphyseal bone and may provide a better stability around hardware in osteoporotic bone and help maintain reduction of fracture fragments.Moreover, a product like ALLOMATRIX could accelerate and improve bone healing and fracture stability by its osteoinductive properties. However, the clinical significance of these new bone graft materials still have to be proven in a randomised controlled study set-up.

NCT ID: NCT00271726 Recruiting - Radius Fractures Clinical Trials

Operative Treatment of Extraarticular Colles' Fractures of the Distal Radius (OTEC)

Start date: November 2005
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a prospective, randomized, multi-center pilot study of unstable extraarticular fractures of the distal radius with dorsal displacement of the distal fragment in elderly patients. The patients are randomly assigned to osteosynthesis with palmar locking plate, external fixator, or Kirschner wires. The aim of this pilot study is to allow a sample size calculation for a main randomized controlled trial (RCT). The primary outcome criterion is the functional status measured by the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary outcome criteria are pain, range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and radiological parameters. Since this is a pilot study it is intended to generate a study hypothesis for the main RCT.