View clinical trials related to Radiculopathy.
Filter by:The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the learning curve of TVUS (transvaginal ultrasound) for the visualization of sacral nerve roots and sacral plexus on gynecological transvaginal ultrasound. The investigators aim to evaluate to evaluate the number needed to gain competence or to review the level of competence.
The goal of this predictive interventional study is todetrmine clinical predictors for success with combined proprioceptive neuromusclualr faciitaion (PNF) and passive mobilization ain patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR).
Cervical radiculopathy is a common neurological disorder that is caused by compression of the nerve, inflammation of nerve roots, or space-occupying lesions. Cervical radiculopathy is the most common health-related problem worldwide. The conservative approach like education, specific exercises, and spinal manipulation is usually given for chronic cases with good outcomes.
Radiculopathy is a neurological condition in which transmission along a spinal nerve and its roots is limited or inhibited. It is most caused by spondylotic changes such as cervical disc herniation leading to nerve root compression, inflammatory changes, and the formation of bony prominences in this region [1]. Pain is the initial symptom and cervical radiculopathy should be suspected when pain radiates from the neck to the shoulder and arm, accompanied by sensory complaints and motor weakness. It is most commonly caused by spondylotic changes, such as cervical disc herniation and bony prominences in this area, leading to nerve root compression and inflammatory changes. Stenotic changes in the spine, which are often observed with aging, can cause nerve damage and compression in individuals, causing radicular pain. However, there is insufficient study in which the relationship between pain caused by cervical spondylotic radiculopathy caused by stenosis and functional disability, disability and quality of life due to radiculopathy in patients is insufficient. In addition, the lack of a comprehensive outcome scale that evaluates the functional limitation caused by radicular pain has also led to a deficiency in the evaluation of functional limitation. In this context, CRES is a newly developed scale used to evaluate functional limitation associated with radicular pain. In this context, in this study, it was aimed to examine the relationship between pain, functional disability, disability and quality of life in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to test the safety and preliminary performance of the ZetaFuse Bone Graft in patient requiring fusion of the C3-C7 vertebral bones due to pain or loss of neurological function. Participants will be treated with ZetaFuse during surgical intervention to reduce pain and the loss of neurological function.
Cervical radiculopathy is one of the most important causes of chronic neck pain. Cervical epidural steroid injections including interlaminar approach are frequently used for treatment option in patients that more conservative modalities are ineffective. Paraspinal muscles have an important role in supporting neck movements and providing stability of the cervical spine. The multifidus muscle, located in the deepest part of the neck extensor muscle group, has become the muscle that is frequently emphasized in spinal pain in recent years. In the literature, it has been shown that the multifidus muscle on the affected side is atrophied in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Although many factors are known to be effective on the outcomes of cervical interlaminar epidural injection, there are limited data on the effect of the multifidus muscle area. In this retrospective study, it was planned to investigate the effect of the multifidus muscle area on the results of cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection.
The aim of this research is to find the effects of neural tension versus neural sliding technique on pain, cervical muscle endurance and hand grip strength in unilateral cervical radiculopathy. It will be a randomized controlled trial in which participants selected through non probability convenience sampling with age from 18 to 65 years having unilateral cervical radicular pain in upper limb since 3 months and any two of the following positive test Spurling's test, Distraction test and Upper Limb Tension Test. Participants will be randomly allocated, into three groups (A, B, and C). On the contrary, patients with any orthopedic or neurological conditions of cervical spine and shoulder joint, malignancy, cervical surgeries and bilateral cervical radiculopathies will be excluded from the study. Baseline measurement of all groups will be taken by using Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain, Cranio-cervical Flexion Test for endurance and Hand-Held Dynamometer for hand grip strength. Group A will receive 7 neural tension technique, Group B will receive neural sliding technique, while Group C will receive both neural tension technique and neural sliding technique for 4 weeks (6 successive sessions). Both techniques (slider and tensioner) will be provided three sets in every session; Each set will be performed in a slow, oscillatory manner with 10 seconds rest between the sets. Posttest measurement will be taken after 4 weeks of treatment. SPSS 21 software will be used for data entry and analysis.
This study will be a Randomized Control Trial in which Both Genders with Age between 20 to 50 Years who had diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathy will be recriuted in to two groups.group A will be recieving spinal mobilzation with leg movement along with TENS & hot pack.whie group B will be given only spinal mobilization with TENS & hot pack.before and after the introduction of interventions pain,disabaility,speed of gait,cadence and SLR will be checked before and after the treatment
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of low level laser therapy with and without proprioceptive stimulation on somatosensation, pain and gait parameters in patients with discogenic lumbar radiculopathy. The randomized central trial will recruit patients according to convenience sampling into two intervention groups randomly. One group will receive low level laser therapy and proprioceptive stimulation and other group will receive low level laser therapy alone. Heating packs will be given to both groups.
Cervical radiculopathy is a common disease related to compression of the nerve roots of the spine (prevalence: 3.5/1000). Dysfunction and pain are the main repercussions and can lead to time off work and high costs in terms of treatment. Second-line surgical treatments appear to be less effective and present risks of side effects. In the first instance, treatments are conservative and include medication but above all physiotherapy with manual therapy, muscle exercises and cervical traction. These cervical tractions performed by a physiotherapist require little equipment and are inexpensive compared with the surgical alternative. They involve stretching the cervical spine and soft tissues to open the intervertebral foramen and mobilise the facet joints. Several authors have written summaries of their interest. Thoomes reports two studies and describes an absence of effect. In a meta-analysis, Romeo et al. added three more recent studies to the previous review and concluded that traction is effective, highlighting an "effect-dose" relationship. These recent results therefore seem to reverse the recommendations made barely two years later. Nevertheless, almost all the studies compared "manual therapy + exercises" with "manual therapy + exercises + cervical traction". Only Young et al. tested "manual therapy + exercises + cervical traction at an effective weight" compared to "manual therapy + exercises + cervical traction placebo at an ineffective weight". The study did not reveal any difference between the groups. However, several limitations appear in this study when comparing the protocol to studies that have shown efficacy. The main limitation is the low intensity (i.e. protocol with fewer sessions and longer duration). These clinical limitations may explain the lack of evidence of a positive outcome. Following on from a preliminary study evaluating an intensive cervical traction protocol over five days, and in order to discern the effect specific to the treatment (specific effect) and the effect independent of the nature of the treatment (contextual effect), the investigators wish to evaluate the impact of this intensive protocol by comparing it with placebo traction. In current practice, treatment varies between establishments. The paucity of studies on cervical traction in radiculopathy has resulted in routine use being guided by habit rather than evidence. It remains a clinical question which raises a major issue requiring a robust experimental design. Ultimately, this study follows on from a preliminary study and is part of a comprehensive research project aimed at proposing new recommendations for the use of traction in patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy. The investigators are investigating the impact of an intensive traction vs. placebo traction protocol in patients with cervical radiculopathy.