View clinical trials related to Radiculopathy.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to describe the contrast flow patterns in the epidural space using the inferior-anterior approach with continuous fluoroscopic guidance, and determine how well this approach correlates with appropriate contrast flow patterns and with analgesia at follow up. This knowledge may prove useful in guiding physician practice patterns in the non-surgical management of low back pain. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that there will be suitable (ventral/anterior) epidural contrast spread based on inferior-anterior needle-tip position, particularly with appropriate needle tip position.
The overall objective is to evaluate if treatment with a neck-specific exercise program and cognitive behavioural approach improves the outcome compared with prescribed, self-mediated and progressive physical activity in patients with cervical radiculopathy. There is a lack of evidence of the best treatment for the patient category. Many patients are sick-listed for long periods of time with different kind of treatment approaches or without any treatment at all. The present study could fill the identified knowledge gap by strengthening of the currently weak scientific evidence for treatment of the patient category. The long-term effects of the study could be to reduce the time for sick leave and improve the rate of patients returning to work and/ or former activity by optimising treatments. Further on, to decrease the number of patients who finally have surgery for their neck problems and thus reducing the mental, physical and social costs.
The purpose of this study is to compare two different approaches (midline and parasagittal) during interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid injection (LESI), and to verify the role of concordant pressure paresthesia occurring during the LESI in determining outcome. The investigators are planning to include 100 patients, undergoing LESI for radicular low back pain. This will be single-blinded randomized study. Every patient will receive the same medication we would use regardless of participating in the study. The patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, based on the approach: - Group I (50 patients) - will get LESI using midline (MIL) approach. - Group II (50 patients) - will get LESI using parasagittal interlaminar (PIL) approach.
This study will compare Z160 and placebo in patients with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy for safety and efficacy for a period of 6 weeks.
DTRAX Graft is used to relieve nerve pressure in the neck in order to provide relief for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease. This study is being conducted to determine the effectiveness of the graft, and to find out whether or not it provides better results or faster healing than traditional ways of performing surgery for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease.
This is a prospective, concurrently controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Spinal Kinetics M6-C artificial cervical disc compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical radiculopathy with or without cord compression. Some participating sites will enroll just M6-C patients, while others will enroll just ACDF patients. Patients eligible for study enrollment will present with degenerative cervical radiculopathy requiring surgical intervention, confirmed clinically and radiographically, at one vertebral level from C3 to C7. A total of 243 subjects will be included at up to 20 sites.
The study is a randomized, double blind, cross-over study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CNV1014802 in subjects with neuropathic pain from lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Comparisons of surgical and non-operative treatment of patients with acute sciatica secondary to lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (AS/LDH) have shown no appreciable difference in outcome. The composition of the non-operative treatment of this patient population remains poorly defined. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) has demonstrated value in the treatment of AS/LDH. Recent preliminary studies suggest that SMT provides therapeutic benefit through the modulation of in vivo inflammatory mediators. This feasibility study will define the key experimental variables required to conduct a large multicentre study that will clarify the biological and clinical outcomes of SMT in the treatment of patients with AS/LDH.
Many patients with cervical disc disease have long-lasting and complex symptoms with chronic pain, low levels of physical and psychological function and sick-leave. Surgery on a few segmental levels might be expected to solve the disc-specific pain but not the non-specific neck pain and the patients'illness. As much as 2/3 of the patients have been reported to have remaining physical/ psychological disability long-term after surgery. A structured physiotherapy programme after surgery may improve patients'function and return to work. The main purpose of the study is to evaluate what a well structured rehabilitation program adds to the customary treatment after surgery for radiculopathy due to cervical disc disease in respect to function, disability, workability and cost effectiveness. The study is a prospective randomised controlled multi-centre study, with an independent and blinded investigator comparing two alternatives of rehabilitation. 200 patients in working age, with cervical disc disease with clinical findings and symptoms of cervical nerve root compression will be included after informed consent. After inclusion in the study patients will be randomised to one out of the two alternatives of physiotherapy, (A) customary treatment (information/ advice on the specialist clinic) or (A+B) active physiotherapy; standardised and structured program of neck specific exercises combined with a behavioural approach plus customary treatment. Patients will be evaluated both clinically and with questionnaires before surgery, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery. Main outcome variable are neck specific disability. Cost-effectiveness will be calculated. The inclusion will preliminary be closed 2012. The study could contribute to a better clinical decision making, a better health care which will reduce physical, mental and social costs for the patients, and improve the rates of patients returning to and staying at work.
Neck pain and related problems occur frequently in modern societies and have a considerable impact on individuals and the society. Cervical radiculopathy (CR) generally presents with pain, numbness, or weakness in a dermatomal distribution. CR results from impingement on a nerve root by either spondylotic narrowing of the neural foramen or a lateral intervertebral disc herniation. Various studies have shown that nonoperative management for CR is effective, such as medications, physical therapy, Spinal manipulation, traction, acupuncture, collar immobilization and epidural steroid injections. Spinal manipulation is one of the manual techniques for treating mechanical neck pain. No high-quality evidence has proved the effectiveness of manipulative therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. However, limited evidence suggests that manipulation may provide short-term benefit in the treatment of neck pain, cervicogenic headaches and radicular symptoms. Few complications, such as worsening radiculopathy, myelopathy, and spinal cord injury, may occur. Spinal massage manipulation is used for centuries in China. Many patients with cervical disc disease are increasingly turning to manipulations to alleviate their symptoms and reduce the side effects of medications. The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of a spinal manipulation, three steps and nine manipulations, on treating with the cervical radiculopathy.