Diagnostic Imaging of Acute Pyelonephritis

Pyelonephritis Acute Clinical Trial

Official title:

Diagnostic Imaging of Acute Pyelonephritis - Part of the INDEED Study (Infectious Diseases in Emergency Departments)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04651244
• Other study ID #: SHS-ED-11a-2020
• Status: Completed
• Start date: March 1, 2021
• Est. completion date: June 1, 2022

Study information

• Verified date: September 2022
• Source: University of Southern Denmark
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Acute pyelonephritis is important to recognize and treat quickly. Today the diagnosis is primarily clinical and often challenging. Sometimes acute pyelonephritis is complicated by obstruction leading to hydronephrosis. The aim of this study is to investigate whether ultrasound scanning conducted by a radiologist can diagnose acute pyelonephritis. Also, the investigators will investigate whether health care professionals with basic ultrasound skills can diagnose hydronephrosis by point-of-care ultrasound scanning in patients suspected of acute pyelonephritis.

Description:

Acute pyelonephritis (APN) is an acute infection in the upper urinary tract, which quite frequently is seen in emergency departments (ED). Most often, an infection of the bladder ascends to the kidneys causing APN. In rarer cases, APN occurs because of a hematogenous spread of bacteria. It is important to identify and treat APN quickly to prevent progression to sepsis, renal failure and ultimately death. Today, primarily APN diagnosis consists of a clinical identification. This is often supported by unspecific blood and urine tests such as C reactive protein (CRP) and leucocytes and urine dipstick. A positive urine culture verifies the APN diagnosis. This diagnostic process is challenging as frequently symptoms are weak and atypical and there is a waiting period for unspecific diagnostic methods and culture results. Complicating an APN diagnosis is asymptomatic bacteriuria, a confusing condition, common in the elderly. Therefore, the empirical treatment initiated often treats a potentially wide range of infections including APN. Currently, the Danish ED do not use diagnostic imaging to confirm APN. Ultrasound scanning (US) by a radiologist rules out other complicating factors such as obstruction or renal abscess. Further imaging is reserved for complicated cases with no response to the initial treatment. Both Computed Tomography (CT) scanning and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can visualize inflammation in the kidneys. Generally, CT is considered the optimal imaging modality in complicated APN cases. The radiation dose-related to a CT must be considered if this imaging technique is to be used as a primary diagnostic tool. MRI appears to be equally or more satisfactory in identifying the inflammatory changes related to APN. However, this investigative tool is more expensive and time-consuming, and often not readily available.

Ultrasound (US) has a lot of advantages in an acute medical setting. It can be utilised at the bedside and is a gentle technique. Conventional grayscale US is not ideal when trying to identify APN. However, more specialized US techniques increase the diagnostic value of US. These techniques include the Doppler US and the contrast-enhanced US (CEUS). Studies suggest that CEUS can identify APN equally to contrast-enhanced CT. Therefore, US has the potential to become relevant in the investigation of patients with a suspected kidney infection in the ED.

This study aims to investigate whether additional diagnostic imaging, in particular US, of patients admitted to the ED with suspected APN will assist in a more reliable diagnosis. Furthermore, it will investigate if point-of-care US of the kidneys by an investigator with basic US skill can assist a more rapid recognition of hydronephrosis in APN patients with complicating obstruction.

The investigators will invite patients admitted with suspected APN to participate in this study, which will include three additional scans. The first is a point of care US of the kidneys by a study assistant to assess the presence or absence of hydronephrosis. The second is a US by a specialist from the Radiology Department using both Doppler US and CEUS. The third scan is a reference standard MRI of the kidneys at the Radiology Department. This will be performed at a similar time (or as close as possible) to the radiologist US. The MRI will be conducted on a 1,5 T MRI scanner and include the following sequences: planning, Dixon, T1 mapping, T2, T2 mapping, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (100, 400, 800), MRI angio (3D VIBE), and Phase Contrast.

These additional imaging findings will be evaluated in relation to the clinical findings.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 19
• Est. completion date: June 1, 2022
• Est. primary completion date: February 28, 2022
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Suspicion of acute pyelonephritis by ED physician

• Suspicion of urinary tract infection by ED physician and systemic affection (e.g. fever, sepsis

Exclusion Criteria:

• Unable to undergo an MRI

• Known allergy to US contrast

• If the attending physician considers that participation will delay a life-saving treatment or patient needs direct transfer to the intensive care unit.

• Admission within the last 14 days

• Verified COVID-19 disease within 14 days before admission

• Pregnant women

• Severe immunodeficiencies: Primary immunodeficiencies and secondary immunodeficiencies (HIV positive CD4 <200, Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment (ATC L04A), Corticosteroid treatment (>20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for >14 days within the last 30 days), Chemotherapy within 30 days)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Pyelonephritis
• Pyelonephritis Acute

Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
• MRI
Gold standard for identifying inflammatory changes in patients with acute pyelonephritis
• Ultrasound performed by a radiologist
US performed by a radiologist including standard grayscale evaluation of the kidneys, Doppler US and contrast enhanced US (CEUS).
• Point of care ultrasound
Point of care US by a study assistant with basic ultrasound skills and training to access the presence or absence of hydronephrosis. If hydronephrosis is present it will be graded into one of four categories.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Denmark	Hospital of Southern Jutland	Aabenraa

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Southern Denmark

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Denmark, 

References & Publications (6)

Claeys KC, Blanco N, Morgan DJ, Leekha S, Sullivan KV. Advances and Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections: the Need for Diagnostic Stewardship. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019 Mar 5;21(4):11. doi: 10.1007/s11908-019-0668-7. Review. — View Citation

Cruz J, Figueiredo F, Matos AP, Duarte S, Guerra A, Ramalho M. Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases of the Urinary Tract: Role of MR Imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2019 Feb;27(1):59-75. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Oct 29. Review. — View Citation

Kazmierski B, Deurdulian C, Tchelepi H, Grant EG. Applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the kidney. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Apr;43(4):880-898. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1307-0. Review. — View Citation

Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Colleselli D, Bartsch G, Strasser H, Steppan I, Pallwein L, Friedrich A, Gradl J, Frauscher F. Acute pyelonephritis: comparison of diagnosis with computed tomography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. BJU Int. 2008 Feb;101(3):341-4. Epub 2007 Oct 17. — View Citation

Quaia E, Correas JM, Mehta M, Murchison JT, Gennari AG, van Beek EJR. Gray Scale Ultrasound, Color Doppler Ultrasound, and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Renal Parenchymal Diseases. Ultrasound Q. 2018 Dec;34(4):250-267. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000383. Review. — View Citation

Rathod SB, Kumbhar SS, Nanivadekar A, Aman K. Role of diffusion-weighted MRI in acute pyelonephritis: a prospective study. Acta Radiol. 2015 Feb;56(2):244-9. doi: 10.1177/0284185114520862. Epub 2014 Jan 17. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Bacteriuria	Binary outcome defined by microbiologist on urine culture analysis	within 4 hours from admission
Primary	Comparison of inflammatory changes in the kidneys on CEUS compared to MRI	Findings on the investigations will be registered on predefined templates. Both kidneys will be described regarding signs of inflammation, where we e.g. look at perfusion on CEUS, and edema or renal lesions on MRI.; Results of the investigations on the same kidneys are compared in order to access specificity and sensitivity of findings on CEUS compared to MRI.; The conducting/describing radiologist will be informed of some standardized clinical and paraclinical parameters (e.g. fever, CRP, flank pain, relevant comorbidity), but will be blinded to the results of the other imaging investigations.	Routine descriptions of the scans will be available within about 48 hours from recruitment. Focused descriptions and comparison are conducted within 6 months after investigation.
Primary	Comparison of inflammatory changes in the kidneys on gray scale US and spectral doppler compared to the reference standard MRI	Findings on the investigations will be registered on predefined templates. Both kidneys will be described regarding signs of inflammation, where we e.g. look at perfusion and resistance on US, and edema or renal lesions on MRI.; Results of the investigations on the same kidneys are compared in order to access specificity and sensitivity of findings on US compared to MRI.; The conducting/describing radiologist will be informed of some standardized clinical and paraclinical parameters (e.g. fever, CRP, flank pain, relevant comorbidity), but will be blinded to the results of the other imaging investigations.	Routine descriptions of the scans will be available within about 48 hours from recruitment. Focused descriptions and comparison is conducted within 6 after investigation.
Primary	Sensitivity and specificity of point-of-care ultrasound on identifying hydronephrosis compared to MRI	How many of hydronephroses in patients suspected of APN is discovered by point of care US performed by an investigator with basic point of care US skills? MRI of the kidneys conducted maximum 24 hours after the point of care US is used as reference standard.	Within 48 hours
Secondary	Proportion of patients with APN and hydronephrosis	We use the gold standard investigation, MRI, to evaluate the number of APN patients who also have hydronephrosis.	Within 12 month