Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04671758
Other study ID # NI7005J
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date June 1, 2017
Est. completion date March 30, 2022

Study information

Verified date October 2020
Source Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Contact Dominique Himbert, MD
Phone 33140256601
Email dominique.himbert@aphp.fr
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The hypothesis is that TAVI using a SAPIEN 3 THV is feasible and safe for the treatment of pure AR.


Description:

Up to now, the balloon-expandable valves have been considered contraindicated for patients with pure AR due to the absence of calcium which is considered necessary for the anchoring of the prosthesis. Nonetheless, several cases report have suggested the feasibility of TAVI using the SAPIEN XT THV, in patients with no calcified valves suggesting that an appropriate degree of oversizing might compensate the lack of calcium for the anchoring of these prostheses. The new generation balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 THV has incorporated changes in the stent frame geometry, leaflets configuration and an external sealing skirt resulting in an increased stability and outstanding control during its implantation, a greater radial force, a reduced rate of paravalvular leaks and a covering of a wider range of annulus dimensions. These characteristics of the SAPIEN 3 THV might translate into a safer use of this device in patients with pure AR and non-calcified valves. Significant AR occurs in 2.0% of individuals of >75 years, 13.3% of patients referred for intervention, being severe in 5% of these patients. As for aortic stenosis, its prevalence increases with age and the most frequent cause is degenerative although rheumatic and endocarditis are present. Although patients with severe AR have an excess risk of mortality and aortic valve replacement reduces mortality, only 1/3 of patients with significant AR finally undergo intervention. Reasons for no intervention are unknown. Even if it has been suggested that AR might be underestimated and the prevalence of this disease might be higher than previously reported, and a percent of patients with indication for aortic valve replacement are denied for surgery, pure AR is a small niche of patients for TAVI. In terms of cost-effectiveness, both the development of a dedicated device and the investment in the training of operators in the implantation technique might lack of interest. However, performing TAVI with a device used in the routine practice might be appealing and, importantly, safer. A preliminary case series including 3 patients have suggested the feasibility of TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 device for pure AR (Urena M, Himbert D. JACC, 2016 ). In this study we aim to evaluate the feasibility and long-term safety of the SAPIEN 3 THV in patients with pure AR.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 50
Est. completion date March 30, 2022
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with symptomatic (at least dyspnoea NYHA class III or acute heart failure requiring hospitalisation) and pure AR - Contraindication or high risk for surgical aortic valve replacement - Echocardiography and computed tomography findings suitable for TAVI using a SAPIEN 3 THV Exclusion Criteria: - Contraindication for TAVI (active endocarditis, aortic dissection, annuloectasia..) - Patients' refusal

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
France Bichat Claude Bernard Paris Ile De France

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Country where clinical trial is conducted

France, 

References & Publications (1)

Urena M, Himbert D, Ohlmann P, Capretti G, Goublaire C, Kindo M, Morel O, Ghodbane W, Iung B, Vahanian A. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to Treat Pure Aortic Regurgitation on Noncalcified Native Valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 11;68(15):1705-1706. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.746. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Feasibility and 30-day safety of TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 THV in patients with pure AR 1/ Device success at 1 month follow up according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2. 2-Rate of moderate or severe AR at 1-month follow-up 30 days
Secondary Long-term safety of TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 THV in patients with pure AR Long-term safety defined as lack of valve migration and 1 year cardiovascular mortality defined according to the VARC-2 (combined endpoint) 1 year
Secondary Long-term performance of TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 THV in patients with pure AR Rate of moderate or severe AR at 1-year follow-up 1 year
Secondary Long-term safety of TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 THV in patients with pure AR Long-term safety defined as lack of 1-year all cause mortality 1 year