Pulmonary Resection Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Fluid Output Threshold for Safe Chest Tube Removal - A Potential Way to Decrease Length of Stay in Hospital and to Improve Postoperative Care After Lung Surgery?
NCT number | NCT03093610 |
Other study ID # | 14032017 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | May 31, 2019 |
Est. completion date | March 30, 2022 |
Verified date | December 2022 |
Source | University Hospital Inselspital, Berne |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Previous studies have shown that the removal of the chest tube after lung surgery significantly improves pain symptoms and lung function. The criteria for chest tube removal still remain vague in modern thoracic surgery and rely on personal experience instead of evidence-based criteria. Every hospital has its own traditional standard fluid threshold and believes in that without adapting and comparing it not even after introduction of newer and more minimal-invasive operation technique. According to literature the traditional fluid threshold is varying from 100 to 500 or even more millilitre in 24 hours. Since pleural fluid resorption is proportional to body weight the investigators believe that a body weight related approach of chest tube management would improve safety and would allow an earlier chest tube removal without a higher rate of complication. In this way the investigators believe in improving pain management and in achieving earlier discharge of the patient.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 337 |
Est. completion date | March 30, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | March 10, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion criteria: - Lobectomy/ Bilobectomy - Segmentectomy - Signed consent - Age of majority Exclusion criteria: - Pneumonectomy - Atypical resections - Empyema - Pleural effusion (not related to surgery) - Pleurodesis - Pregnancy |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Switzerland | Bern University Hospital | Bern |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Hospital Inselspital, Berne |
Switzerland,
Bjerregaard LS, Jensen K, Petersen RH, Hansen HJ. Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy with serous fluid production up to 500 ml/day. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Feb;45(2):241-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt376. Epub 2013 Jul 19. — View Citation
Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. Results of a prospective algorithm to remove chest tubes after pulmonary resection with high output. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Feb;135(2):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.08.066. — View Citation
Irshad K, Feldman LS, Chu VF, Dorval JF, Baslaim G, Morin JE. Causes of increased length of hospitalization on a general thoracic surgery service: a prospective observational study. Can J Surg. 2002 Aug;45(4):264-8. Erratum In: Can J Surg. 2003 Dec;46(6):466. Can J Surg. 2004 Feb;47(1):69. — View Citation
Mueller XM, Tinguely F, Tevaearai HT, Ravussin P, Stumpe F, von Segesser LK. Impact of duration of chest tube drainage on pain after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Nov;18(5):570-4. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00515-7. — View Citation
Refai M, Brunelli A, Salati M, Xiume F, Pompili C, Sabbatini A. The impact of chest tube removal on pain and pulmonary function after pulmonary resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):820-2; discussion 823. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr126. Epub 2011 Dec 21. — View Citation
STEWART PB. The rate of formation and lymphatic removal of fluid in pleural effusions. J Clin Invest. 1963 Feb;42(2):258-62. doi: 10.1172/JCI104712. No abstract available. — View Citation
Xie HY, Xu K, Tang JX, Bian W, Ma HT, Zhao J, Ni B. A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 ml/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Aug;21(2):200-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv115. Epub 2015 May 15. — View Citation
Younes RN, Gross JL, Aguiar S, Haddad FJ, Deheinzelin D. When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Nov;195(5):658-62. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01332-7. — View Citation
Zhang Y, Li H, Hu B, Li T, Miao JB, You B, Fu YL, Zhang WQ. A prospective randomized single-blind control study of volume threshold for chest tube removal following lobectomy. World J Surg. 2014 Jan;38(1):60-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2271-7. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of recurrent pleural effusions after chest tube removal | Evaluation of recurrent pleural effusion after chest tube removal | up to 6 weeks postoperative | |
Primary | Pain scores (VAS-Score) | Evaluation of Pain Scores after Chest tube removal | postoperative Period until 3 hours after Chest tube removal | |
Primary | Time Point of chest tube removal | postoperative day of chest tube removal | Postoperative, expected to be up to 1 week after surgery | |
Secondary | Patient discharge | Time Point of Patient discharge | At time of discharge, on average 4-7 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02168751 -
Inflammatory Response Secondary Using Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Inhalation Anesthesia With Halogenated Agents
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03720405 -
Measurement of the Distance Between the Corresponding Anatomical Landmarks in the Thoracic Cavity and the Incisors
|
||
Completed |
NCT04985474 -
Impact of Pulmonary Rehabilitation After Lung Resection for Cancer on Patients' Level of Anxiety and Depression
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05511636 -
Comparing The Outcome Of High Flow Oxygen Versus Conventional Oxygen In Extubated Patients After Lung Resection.
|
N/A |